On Mon, 9 Apr 2007 23:02:22 +0300
"Török Edvin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 4/9/07, Brian Morrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thu, 5 Apr 2007 19:56:44 +0100
> > Brian Morrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Since updating to 0.9x I have noticed that from time to time after a
> > > cdiff update via freshclam, clamd reports a much smaller value for the
> > > number of signatures than freshclam. Some number of updates later
> > > the two then match again.
> >
> > Hmm, no response at all.
> >
>
> Are you sure freshclam and clamd are configured the same database directory?
> It can happen that certain signatures are ignored on db load, but
> 105451 vs 90875 is
> too big of a difference.
> Are you sure you didn't change the configuration of clamd meanwhile?
>
> Does this situation occur often?
To comment further on this problem, since I updated to 0.90.2 I have
not seen the effect described again.
I'll keep monitoring it just in case, but if anyone was worrying about
it they can put the worry thread onto the back burner now :)
--
Brian Morrison
bdm at fenrir dot org dot uk
"Arguing with an engineer is like wrestling with a pig in the mud;
after a while you realize you are muddy and the pig is enjoying it."
GnuPG key ID DE32E5C5 - http://wwwkeys.uk.pgp.net/pgpnet/wwwkeys.html
_______________________________________________
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
