On Wed, Aug 25, 2004 at 07:42:24AM -0400, Jim Maul wrote:
> webmasters using BMPs?? I'd leave it at 200, tell him to use jpgs or pngs
> and
That's a very rough response... I mean - I agree with you - but people will
be people.
I personally think that compression option should be classified the
Dear ClamAV users,
as previously announced [*] we are dropping support for ClamAV 0.60 on
September 1st.
You can still convert the database to the legacy format manually, but we
won't be distributing it through our mirrors.
If you are still running ClamAV 0.60 please upgrade your system! You ca
Jason Haar wrote the following on 08/29/2004 11:26 AM :
On Wed, Aug 25, 2004 at 07:42:24AM -0400, Jim Maul wrote:
webmasters using BMPs?? I'd leave it at 200, tell him to use jpgs or pngs
and
That's a very rough response... I mean - I agree with you - but people will
be people.
I personal
HI
> > webmasters using BMPs?? I'd leave it at 200, tell him to use jpgs or
pngs and
> That's a very rough response... I mean - I agree with you - but people
will be people.
Maybe for usuall users. But not for WebMasters.
> I disabled it as we had too many people who seem to be sending large BM
I currently run 0.74a without any problems.
Today however I recieved a virus attachment in an email that was identified by McAffee
as mydoom.o
I went and forced an immediate update of my database files and scanned my imap
directories and the virus was not identified.
I then submitted it to the
On Sun, 29 Aug 2004 12:16:17 -0500
"Carl Thompson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I then submitted it to the virus submission page and it stated it was
> already in the dev database and that I should run freshclam.
Update to 0.75.1 or CVS.
--
oo. Tomasz Kojm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > I then submitted it to the virus submission page and it stated it was
> > already in the dev database and that I should run freshclam.
>
> Update to 0.75.1 or CVS.
Just FYI, I upgraded today from devel-20040630 to 0.75.1 with no trouble.
I have been running clamav in parallel with uvscan on m
On Sunday 29 Aug 2004 20:35, Graham Toal wrote:
> > Update to 0.75.1 or CVS.
> If we ever
> get overloaded however I would turn clamav off first, as it is much more
> of a CPU hog than uvscan]
You should find the CVS version is better than 0.75.1 in this respect.
-Nigel
--
Nigel Horne. Arran
I had nothing but headaches with uvscan... We run 4 virus scanners and 4
other tests to a one-stop-server (all services)... Our load is pretty good,
usually below 1.00. We process approximately 20,000 messages a day.
I found that running clamscan rather then the deamon was a better option.
Have you considered auto-converting the .bmp to a .jpg, and remiming the
message? Also, stripping the image and putting it into a temporary web
link(expires and deletes say after 12 hours)?
Both might be options to use on your users I have many similar things
I've had to do to keep secur
10 matches
Mail list logo
