[Clamav-users] Re: dev virus database

[Mar Matthias Darin]

I had nothing but headaches with uvscan... We run 4 virus scanners and 4 other tests to a one-stop-server (all services)... Our load is pretty good, usually below 1.00. We process approximately 20,000 messages a day.

I found that running clamscan rather then the deamon was a better option. I noticed the deamon was a little heavier in resources. What mta are you rinnung? That was my biggest bottleneck...

Nigel Horne writes:

On Sunday 29 Aug 2004 20:35, Graham Toal wrote:

> Update to 0.75.1 or CVS.

<snip>

 If we ever
get overloaded however I would turn clamav off first, as it is much more
of a CPU hog than uvscan]

You should find the CVS version is better than 0.75.1 in this respect.

-Nigel

pgp2CEsiQNwsB.pgp
Description: PGP signature