On Wed, Aug 25, 2004 at 07:42:24AM -0400, Jim Maul wrote:
> webmasters using BMPs??  I'd leave it at 200, tell him to use jpgs or pngs 
> and

That's a very rough response... I mean - I agree with you - but people will
be people.

I personally think that compression option should be classified the same way
as the "encrypted zip file" option: disabled by default, and should have
more of a description as to why and how you should set it.

I disabled it as we had too many people who seem to be sending large BMP
files around: instead of the naive, non-IT end-user trying to find some TOOL
to convert their BMP to a JPG, they did the next smart thing and put it into
a ZIP file - thus getting the great compression they were after before
e-mailing it off. (I haven't had time to figure out what ratio would be high
enough to allow all such files in, so have disabled instead of setting it
higher - which I would actually prefer)

To blame users for such an action is a bit extreme...

Not everyone is a Linux user or a Windows programmer/designer - like we are
;-)


-- 
Cheers

Jason Haar
Information Security Manager, Trimble Navigation Ltd.
Phone: +64 3 9635 377 Fax: +64 3 9635 417
PGP Fingerprint: 7A2E 0407 C9A6 CAF6 2B9F 8422 C063 5EBB FE1D 66D1


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop
FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools!
Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5047&alloc_id=10808&op=click
_______________________________________________
Clamav-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clamav-users

Reply via email to