It works! Thanks a lot.
Yummi Chang
Hi guys, I just installed the clamav as a rpm package. It seems that I
cannot run the freshclam with this options as per in the manual.
# freshclam --quiet -l /var/log/clam-update.log
The error is
ERROR: LOGGER Can't open file /var/log/clam-update.log
ERROR: Problem with internal logger
Now,
* Elliot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20021016 09:05]: wrote:
>
> Hi guys, I just installed the clamav as a rpm package. It seems that I
> cannot run the freshclam with this options as per in the manual.
>
> # freshclam --quiet -l /var/log/clam-update.log
>
> The error is
&g
I am familiar with software installations, but clamav is an exception.
I have built/installed it but I don't find clamd anywhere.
This is FreeBSD 4.x, clamav-0.24
tia
-Wash
--
Odhiambo Washington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "The box said 'Requires
Wananchi Online Ltd. www.wananchi.com Wi
On Wed, 16 Oct 2002, Odhiambo Washington wrote:
>
> I am familiar with software installations, but clamav is an exception.
>
> I have built/installed it but I don't find clamd anywhere.
>
> This is FreeBSD 4.x, clamav-0.24
>
I could be wrong, but I don't think v 0.24 has clamd. It should have
cla
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20021016 10:42]: wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Oct 2002, Odhiambo Washington wrote:
>
> >
> > I am familiar with software installations, but clamav is an exception.
> >
> > I have built/installed it but I don't find cl
HI guys, it seems that I have a problem with the report function.
How do I make the report file to SHOW WHICH files are being infected?
The option -i -l report.txt does not yield much info. It only shows HOW
MANY files are infected. But not WHICH files. Can someone throw me a
bone here?
cheers`
On Wed, 16 Oct 2002, W a s h i n g t o n wrote:
> * [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20021016 10:42]: wrote:
> > On Wed, 16 Oct 2002, Odhiambo Washington wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > I am familiar with software installations, but clamav is an exception.
>
At 09:14 16/10/2002, you wrote:
>How do I make the report file to SHOW WHICH files are being infected?
>The option -i -l report.txt does not yield much info. It only shows HOW
>MANY files are infected. But not WHICH files. Can someone throw me a
>bone here?
I think the infected file names goes ou
Freshclam.log must be owned by clamav, whereas clamscan.log is root owned.
Cheers
Brian
At 06:50 16/10/2002, you wrote:
>Hi guys, I just installed the clamav as a rpm package. It seems that I
>cannot run the freshclam with this options as per in the manual.
>
># freshclam --quiet -l /var/log/cl
This is a suggestion.
It would be nice to prepend the subject of posts to this list with [clamav-users],
no?
-Wash
--
Odhiambo Washington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "The box said 'Requires
Wananchi Online Ltd. www.wananchi.com Windows 95, NT, or better,'
Tel: +254 2 313985-9 +254 2 313922
Ok , this is my solution so far
$ /usr/bin/clamscan --stdout -r -I / >/downloads/clam.txt
It outputs to a file and I got cron to mail me the txt file. Btw , is
there a way to disable testing on the /proc directory?
Seems that I get some garbage when I scan the entire / and all the
/proc comes
Yes, my email rules would work much better then. Lots of other mailing
list also just use [users].
Isn't it just a parameter to the mailing list software?
cheers
Brian
At 10:02 16/10/2002, you wrote:
>It would be nice to prepend the subject of posts to this list with
>[clamav-users],
>no?
* Brian Read <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20021016 13:13]: wrote:
> Yes, my email rules would work much better then. Lots of other mailing
> list also just use [users].
>
> Isn't it just a parameter to the mailing list software?
It's a set-table value, AFAIK. In the two
Hi. I just ran It as this
# clamscan --stdout .
But WHERE is the stdout file? ... I did a updatedb but I could not find
that file. So where does clamscan reports the filename to? Or should I
put more options? .. If so what are the options..
Thanks
-Original Message-
From: Brian Read [
log from my run:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] EIcar AntiVirus demos]# clamscan -i --stdout
/home/e-smith/files/ibays/software2/files/linux/EIcar AntiVirus
demos/eicar_com.zip: Eicar-Test-Signature FOUND
/home/e-smith/files/ibays/software2/files/linux/EIcar AntiVirus
demos/eicarcom2.zip: Eicar-Test-Signatur
Use the --exclude parameter
B.
At 10:59 16/10/2002, you wrote:
>is
>there a way to disable testing on the /proc directory?
Brian J Read
www.abandonmicrosoft.co.uk
www.theonlineorganiser.com
www.thepersonalknowledgebase.com
Mitel SMEserver Contributions and Howtos:
www.abandonmicrosoft.co.uk/aba
I hate to go subscribe to the amavis list just to ask one question.
I hope someone here can help. Flame me if you have some fuel ;)
I am trying to install amavis-ng (0.1.4.1 and even the CVS version) and it
fails at `make install` like this:
nstalling /usr/local/bin/./amavis
Installing /usr/l
Odhiambo Washington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>It's a set-table value, AFAIK. In the two MLMs that I've used so far
>I know it is. I don't know about what these guys user here though;-)
>Looks like their own home-brewed one.
It's ezmlm.
Personally, I think subject prefixes are annoying and a w
Not at all, they are ideal to use for email rules to sort into different
folders. I get between 50-100 emails a day, and need to prioritise which i
read immediatly, and which I leave until later.
Cheers
Brian
At 12:53 16/10/2002, you wrote:
>Personally, I think subject prefixes are annoying a
[Please don't top-post. If you don't know what top-posting is, check
Google.]
Brian Read <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Not at all, [subject tags] are ideal to use for email rules to sort
>into different folders.
No, they suck for filtering messages into different folders for
exactly the reason tha
Quoting W a s h i n g t o n <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Thank you very much for the response. I am glad you are using FreeBSD.
> I did do a bit more reading and noted that there is version 0.51.
> However, I do have 2 questions still..
>
>
> 1. In the README for 0.51, it is noted thus "
> ClamAV
Quoting Brian Read <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Not at all, they are ideal to use for email rules to sort into different
> folders.
No, they are not. As has been pointed out, they are not unique. What _is_
ideal, or would be if every list manager used it, is the List-ID: header.
Failing that, the T
At 13:30 16/10/2002, you wrote:
>[Please don't top-post. If you don't know what top-posting is, check
>Google.]
sorry, a slip of the brain.
> >Not at all, [subject tags] are ideal to use for email rules to sort
> >into different folders.
>
>No, they suck for filtering messages into different fol
At 15:00 16/10/2002, you wrote:
>So my vote goes to (and I have no illusions about this being a democracy, but
>if it were...) dump the subject tag and add a List-ID: header.
My vote as well.
As long as it is unique, my email rules will work...
Cheers
Brian
Brian J Read
www.abandonmicrosoft.co
Quoting Brian Read <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> At 13:30 16/10/2002, you wrote:
> >No, they suck for filtering messages into different folders for
> >exactly the reason that this thread is taking place: they're not
> >guaranteed to be unique. A much better field to filter upon is
> >Return-Path. If your
Brian Read <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>At 13:30 16/10/2002, you wrote:
>>[Please don't top-post. If you don't know what top-posting is, check
>>Google.]
>
>sorry, a slip of the brain.
No problem.
>The RP on this message is meaningless via a vis the mail list.
>
>"Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Try the amavis-ng-0.1.3
I got amavis-ng-0.1.4 but it didn´t work.
Mário Luis Ghoneim
- Original Message -
From: "Odhiambo Washington" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2002 8:27 AM
Subject: [users] OT: Amavis-ng install failure
>
>
> I hate to go
At 15:21 16/10/2002, you wrote:
> >"Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "
>
>That's not right. Your MTA or MUA is lying to you. The proper
>Return-Path should look like:
>
>Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Well my MTA is qmail, and my MUA is Eudora, i guess it must be Eudora
getting it wrong, or my
* Mário Luis Ghoneim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20021016 18:53]: wrote:
> Try the amavis-ng-0.1.3
> I got amavis-ng-0.1.4 but it didn´t work.
Did it also fail to install during `make install`??
Since 0.1.4.1 is supposed to be better than the earlier versions, I think
I am gonna dum
Hi,
I find that running freshclam fails roughly 9 out of 10 times with errors such
as the following:
strat:/var/log# freshclam
Checking for a new database - started at Thu Oct 17 09:44:36 2002
Current working dir is /var/lib/clamav/
Connected to clamav.elektrapro.com.
Reading md5 sum (viruses.md
31 matches
Mail list logo