-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 24 Jun 2004, Trog wrote:
> On Mon, 2004-06-21 at 18:35, Christopher X. Candreva wrote:
> > Segmentation Fault
> Please test with current CVS (as of now).
> Thanks
> -trog
Before proceeding I have to appoligise in advance for this email.
yest
On Mon, 2004-06-21 at 18:35, Christopher X. Candreva wrote:
> Segmentation Fault
Please test with current CVS (as of now).
Thanks
-trog
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Mon, 2004-06-21 at 18:35, Christopher X. Candreva wrote:
> Here's the latest crash output:
>
> LibClamAV debug: Recognized Raw mail file
> LibClamAV debug: Starting cli_scanmail(), reclev 3
> LibClamAV debug: in mbox()
> LibClamAV debug: Recognized Raw mail file
> LibClamAV debug: Saving attac
On Mon, 2004-06-21 at 17:57, Christopher X. Candreva wrote:
> Going through the debug output since the last crash, I see about 20 errors
> where a VBA scan dir failed on a "can't open". It seems to be in the same
> context as when the last crash occurred. Here is an example:
>
> LibClamAV debug
Here's the latest crash output:
LibClamAV debug: Recognized Raw mail file
LibClamAV debug: Starting cli_scanmail(), reclev 3
LibClamAV debug: in mbox()
LibClamAV debug: Recognized Raw mail file
LibClamAV debug: Deal with header Received: by clamd
LibClamAV debug: parseEmailHeader 'Received: by cl
Going through the debug output since the last crash, I see about 20 errors
where a VBA scan dir failed on a "can't open". It seems to be in the same
context as when the last crash occurred. Here is an example:
LibClamAV debug: Recognized OLE2 container file
LibClamAV debug: in cli_scanole2()
On Mon, 21 Jun 2004, Trog wrote:
> Are there any files left in this directory:
>
> LibClamAV debug: Saving attachment in
> /tmp/clamav/clamav-5bce8e8e51ede379/textportion
clamav-5bce8e8e51ede379 is no longer there, although there are a number of
leftover directories. I'll see what happens next
On Mon, 2004-06-21 at 17:02, Christopher X. Candreva wrote:
> My server's clamd (0.73) has starting dyeing off regularly again (every
> 10-30 minutes). I've managed to capture some debug information, but somehow
> haven't gotten it to make a core file yet.
>
> Again, compiled under gcc 3.4.0, So
My server's clamd (0.73) has starting dyeing off regularly again (every
10-30 minutes). I've managed to capture some debug information, but somehow
haven't gotten it to make a core file yet.
Again, compiled under gcc 3.4.0, Solaris 8 on UltraSparc hardware (Sun Ultra
2)
Output from running un
On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 07:12:44AM -0700, Brian W. Antoine wrote:
> At 07:28 PM 9/3/03, you wrote:
> >I'm using a modified version of:
> >
> > *SpamAssassin Milter version 0.5.5
> > * For use with the SpamAssassin http://www.spamassassin.org/ ``spamd''
>
> That's one of the ones
At 07:28 PM 9/3/03, you wrote:
>I'm using a modified version of:
>
> *SpamAssassin Milter version 0.5.5
> * For use with the SpamAssassin http://www.spamassassin.org/ ``spamd''
That's one of the ones I looked at, it's another SF project I believe
now. Their mailing list has as m
On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 06:01:45PM +0200, Tomasz Papszun wrote:
> > >I'm not sure of the status for clamav-milter, but IIRC it's clamd
> dying in most cases, due to problems in the mbox.c code. ALl my clamd
> problems went away after I disabled the "ScanMail" option in
> clamav.conf.
Cannot prove
On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 07:20:24PM -0700, Brian W. Antoine wrote:
> At 06:58 PM 9/3/03, you wrote:
> >On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 06:01:55PM -0700, Brian W. Antoine wrote:
> >> At 10:09 AM 9/3/03, you wrote:
> >> >On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 08:51:26AM -0700, Brian W. Antoine wrote:
> >> >
> >> >Xclamav, S
At 06:58 PM 9/3/03, you wrote:
>On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 06:01:55PM -0700, Brian W. Antoine wrote:
>> At 10:09 AM 9/3/03, you wrote:
>> >On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 08:51:26AM -0700, Brian W. Antoine wrote:
>> >
>> >Xclamav, S=local:/var/run/clmilter.sock, F=, T=S:4m;R:4m
>> >
>> >Clamd and clamav-milte
On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 06:01:55PM -0700, Brian W. Antoine wrote:
> At 10:09 AM 9/3/03, you wrote:
> >On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 08:51:26AM -0700, Brian W. Antoine wrote:
> >
> >Xclamav, S=local:/var/run/clmilter.sock, F=, T=S:4m;R:4m
> >
> >Clamd and clamav-milter just cored about 30 minutes ago, and
At 10:09 AM 9/3/03, you wrote:
>On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 08:51:26AM -0700, Brian W. Antoine wrote:
>> At 08:12 AM 9/3/2003, you wrote:
>> >On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 07:51:32AM -0700, Brian W. Antoine wrote:
>> >> would provide a way to fail more gracefully. Blocking all incoming
>> >mail might be
>>
On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 08:51:26AM -0700, Brian W. Antoine wrote:
> At 08:12 AM 9/3/2003, you wrote:
> >On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 07:51:32AM -0700, Brian W. Antoine wrote:
> >> would provide a way to fail more gracefully. Blocking all incoming
> >mail might be
> >> an option for an individual user,
On Wed, 03 Sep 2003 at 7:51:32 -0700, Brian W. Antoine wrote:
> At 11:21 PM 9/2/03, you wrote:
> >I'm not sure of the status for clamav-milter, but IIRC it's clamd
dying in most cases, due to problems in the mbox.c code. ALl my clamd
problems went away after I disabled the "ScanMail" option in
cla
At 08:12 AM 9/3/2003, you wrote:
On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 07:51:32AM -0700, Brian W. Antoine wrote:
> would provide a way to fail more gracefully. Blocking all incoming
mail might be
> an option for an individual user, but an ISP would probably want an
option to
> simply let the mail flow uncheck
On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 07:51:32AM -0700, Brian W. Antoine wrote:
> would provide a way to fail more gracefully. Blocking all incoming mail might be
> an option for an individual user, but an ISP would probably want an option to
> simply let the mail flow unchecked while a warning was sent to some
At 11:21 PM 9/2/03, you wrote:
>Brian W. Antoine wrote:
>>At 11:17 PM 9/2/03, you wrote:
>>
>>>On Wed, 2003-09-03 at 01:17, Brian W. Antoine wrote:
>>>
I'm on a Mandrake 9.1 system using clamav-milter with sendmail and about
once a day I find the following:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>I had the exact s
Brian W. Antoine wrote:
At 11:17 PM 9/2/03, you wrote:
On Wed, 2003-09-03 at 01:17, Brian W. Antoine wrote:
I'm on a Mandrake 9.1 system using clamav-milter with sendmail and about
once a day I find the following:
I had the exact same problems myself, with RH 8.0 and Sendmail, using
clamav-mil
On Tue, 02 Sep 2003 at 22:55:18 -0700, Brian W. Antoine wrote:
> At 11:17 PM 9/2/03, you wrote:
> >My solution was to use Amavis-New/amavis-milter. Since getting it
> >installed and running, I have had no problems whatsoever, and it's been
> >running now for about 5 days. The nice thing about ama
At 11:17 PM 9/2/03, you wrote:
>On Wed, 2003-09-03 at 01:17, Brian W. Antoine wrote:
>> I'm on a Mandrake 9.1 system using clamav-milter with sendmail and about
>> once a day I find the following:
>
>
>I had the exact same problems myself, with RH 8.0 and Sendmail, using
>clamav-milter. I asked
On Wed, 2003-09-03 at 01:17, Brian W. Antoine wrote:
> I'm on a Mandrake 9.1 system using clamav-milter with sendmail and about
> once a day I find the following:
I had the exact same problems myself, with RH 8.0 and Sendmail, using
clamav-milter. I asked a few times about what a solution woul
I'm on a Mandrake 9.1 system using clamav-milter with sendmail and about
once a day I find the following:
1) Clamd has died and left itself like this
6162 ?S 0:00 /usr/local/sbin/clamd LESSKEY=/etc/.less LC_MONETARY=
6166 ?Z 0:00 \_ [clamd ]
6167 ?S 0:
26 matches
Mail list logo
