At 06:58 PM 9/3/03, you wrote: >On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 06:01:55PM -0700, Brian W. Antoine wrote: >> At 10:09 AM 9/3/03, you wrote: >> >On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 08:51:26AM -0700, Brian W. Antoine wrote: >> > >> >Xclamav, S=local:/var/run/clmilter.sock, F=, T=S:4m;R:4m >> > >> >Clamd and clamav-milter just cored about 30 minutes ago, and mail >> >continued to be accepted... >> >> I've got the same config here and once clamd dies, the mail stops being >> processed. Weird ... >> >> Given the opinions that the mbox code is where a lot of the problems are >> hiding, and the thread in the developers list that published a hack for >> simply calling 'ripmime' instead, I've applied that change and I'm now >> waiting to see if clamd still dies. > >Hmm. I wonder if the difference might be that I've got another >milter that sendmail uses first (to talk to SpamAssassin).
Maybe, clamav is the only milter I'm running, I couldn't find a dependable one for SA. ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Clamav-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clamav-users
