On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 07:20:24PM -0700, Brian W. Antoine wrote: > At 06:58 PM 9/3/03, you wrote: > >On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 06:01:55PM -0700, Brian W. Antoine wrote: > >> At 10:09 AM 9/3/03, you wrote: > >> >On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 08:51:26AM -0700, Brian W. Antoine wrote: > >> > > >> >Xclamav, S=local:/var/run/clmilter.sock, F=, T=S:4m;R:4m > >> > > >> >Clamd and clamav-milter just cored about 30 minutes ago, and mail > >> >continued to be accepted... > >> > >> I've got the same config here and once clamd dies, the mail stops being > >> processed. Weird ... > >> > >> Given the opinions that the mbox code is where a lot of the problems are > >> hiding, and the thread in the developers list that published a hack for > >> simply calling 'ripmime' instead, I've applied that change and I'm now > >> waiting to see if clamd still dies. > > > >Hmm. I wonder if the difference might be that I've got another > >milter that sendmail uses first (to talk to SpamAssassin). > > Maybe, clamav is the only milter I'm running, I couldn't find a dependable > one for SA.
I'm using a modified version of: * SpamAssassin Milter version 0.5.5 * For use with the SpamAssassin http://www.spamassassin.org/ ``spamd'' Friend of mine that worked for sendmail.com gave it to me. The major change is that it has a compiled-in list of the local network, so that spamassassin isn't called on local mail. If you like, I'd be happy to mail you the source. -j ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Clamav-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clamav-users
