Looking over the clamd failures on my mail server I noticed that it
was always leaving behind a work directory in /tmp, which pretty much
narrows it down to the mbox.c code that pulls apart a mail message for
scanning. James Stevens had posted a message to the clamav-devel list
about replacing m
On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 07:20:24PM -0700, Brian W. Antoine wrote:
> At 06:58 PM 9/3/03, you wrote:
> >On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 06:01:55PM -0700, Brian W. Antoine wrote:
> >> At 10:09 AM 9/3/03, you wrote:
> >> >On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 08:51:26AM -0700, Brian W. Antoine wrote:
> >> >
> >> >Xclamav, S
At 06:58 PM 9/3/03, you wrote:
>On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 06:01:55PM -0700, Brian W. Antoine wrote:
>> At 10:09 AM 9/3/03, you wrote:
>> >On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 08:51:26AM -0700, Brian W. Antoine wrote:
>> >
>> >Xclamav, S=local:/var/run/clmilter.sock, F=, T=S:4m;R:4m
>> >
>> >Clamd and clamav-milte
On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 06:01:55PM -0700, Brian W. Antoine wrote:
> At 10:09 AM 9/3/03, you wrote:
> >On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 08:51:26AM -0700, Brian W. Antoine wrote:
> >
> >Xclamav, S=local:/var/run/clmilter.sock, F=, T=S:4m;R:4m
> >
> >Clamd and clamav-milter just cored about 30 minutes ago, and
Thanks Rick
Looks like you drew a crowd on that one.
I appreciate all yall's help...
Les
Rick Macdougall wrote:
Hi,
Since there is a clamoring for it...
http://newmail.axess.com/downloads/clamd_scanner.sub
Regards,
Rick
Jeff Bilder wrote:
I would love to see what you did. Can I snag
At 10:09 AM 9/3/03, you wrote:
>On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 08:51:26AM -0700, Brian W. Antoine wrote:
>> At 08:12 AM 9/3/2003, you wrote:
>> >On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 07:51:32AM -0700, Brian W. Antoine wrote:
>> >> would provide a way to fail more gracefully. Blocking all incoming
>> >mail might be
>>
Hi Nigel/Ludek
Thanks for your help gents:-)
It now compiles now get it working with sendmail
regards
Rick
- Original Message -
From: "Nigel Horne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2003 9:20 PM
Subject: RE: [Clamav-users] clamav-milter
On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 10:38:19AM -0400, Adam Williams wrote:
> > > > > Is this the milter fixing release?
> > > > The clamd+clamav_milter duet should work more stable but this is not yet
> > > > a final fix.
> > > Yep, it ran for about a day -
> > What about the CVS version ?
>
> The couple of
David Jansen and Ludek Finstrle, thanks for the help, it seems to have
allowed me to make and install the package, and follow the rest of the
instructions in the clamav documentation to make some changes to the
sendmail.cf, I've restarted sendmail and sent some test attachments
(using the /clamav-0
> I have an unreferenced symbol problem. engine.o references inet_aton
The "configure" script has a problem on Solaris. After running it, you
need to modify clamav-milter/Makefile to add "-lresolv" to the
list of libraries included in the line starting "LIBS=".
-Nigel Horne
--
Hi All
I've only just joined this list, so I hope my question is not too basic.
I am trying to install clamav-milter and having a compilation problem in the
"make" phase.
I'm running Solaris 8 on a Sun E250.
Basically, I've installed sendmail 8.12.9 and created a site.config.m4 so
that sendmail
> Red Hat Linux 7.3 on i386
>
> On Tuesday 02 Sep 2003 5:03 pm, Hanson, Erik wrote:
> > I'm trying to install ClamAV 0.60, and having some problems with the
> > MAKE step:
>
> What operating system and CPU architecture?
Change line in clamav-milter/Makefile after configure from:
LIBS = -L../lib
Tom Walsh wrote:
> ::Howdy list,
> ::
> ::My operating system is FreeBSD 4.8-RELEASE (and 5.1-RELEASE
> ::on my devel box).
> ::
> ::I'm currently running qmail + qmail-scanner + ClamAV, and
> ::I'm wondering if I should be using AmaVis? I'd appreciate
> ::it if anyone running ClamAV and qmail wou
What's the proper place to report bugs in clamd?
Please ignore gdb not finding /usr/local/lib/libz.so.1. On the box where
it runs, /usr/local/lib/libz.so.1 does exist.
proxy{jeffw}65: gdb .libs/clamd clamd_core1
GNU gdb 4.18
Copyright 1998 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
GDB is free software, cove
On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 08:51:26AM -0700, Brian W. Antoine wrote:
> At 08:12 AM 9/3/2003, you wrote:
> >On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 07:51:32AM -0700, Brian W. Antoine wrote:
> >> would provide a way to fail more gracefully. Blocking all incoming
> >mail might be
> >> an option for an individual user,
On Wednesday 03 September 2003 08:40 am, Tom Walsh wrote:
> Jesse,
>
> We are an ISP in South Alabama that is using a combination of
> qmail/vpopmail + ClamAV + spamassassin tied together with maildrop at the
> users .qmail level (under FBSD 4.8).
>
> We didn't want to do scanning on all email due
Hi,
Since there is a clamoring for it...
http://newmail.axess.com/downloads/clamd_scanner.sub
Regards,
Rick
Jeff Bilder wrote:
I would love to see what you did. Can I snag a copy. Thanks!
- Jeff
-Original Message-
From: Rick Macdougall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, Se
About the build problems on RedHat, I noticed these too and found a
workaround (and reported it here somewhere last week):
edit clamav-milter/Mailfile and where it links with -lmilter, add
-lsmutil
libsmutil.a is also in the sendmail-devel package and it contains the
strlcpy function (and maybe oth
On Wed, 03 Sep 2003 at 7:51:32 -0700, Brian W. Antoine wrote:
> At 11:21 PM 9/2/03, you wrote:
> >I'm not sure of the status for clamav-milter, but IIRC it's clamd
dying in most cases, due to problems in the mbox.c code. ALl my clamd
problems went away after I disabled the "ScanMail" option in
cla
At 08:12 AM 9/3/2003, you wrote:
On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 07:51:32AM -0700, Brian W. Antoine wrote:
> would provide a way to fail more gracefully. Blocking all incoming
mail might be
> an option for an individual user, but an ISP would probably want an
option to
> simply let the mail flow uncheck
Rick,
I'd like a copy. Please send me one, or post it here. Thanks a lot!!!
Hongwei
==Original message text===
On Wed, 03 Sep 2003 10:20:59 am CDT Rick Macdougall wrote:
Mark Novak wrote:
> Thelv,
>
> No problem at all.
>
> As an aside, if anyone has figured out h
Rick,
I'd love a copy!
Thanks,
Mark
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Rick
Macdougall
Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2003 10:21 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] clam antivirus and spamassassin
Mark Novak wrote:
> Thel
::Howdy list,
::
::My operating system is FreeBSD 4.8-RELEASE (and 5.1-RELEASE
::on my devel box).
::
::I'm currently running qmail + qmail-scanner + ClamAV, and
::I'm wondering if I should be using AmaVis? I'd appreciate
::it if anyone running ClamAV and qmail would share their
::experience with t
I would love to see what you did. Can I snag a copy. Thanks!
- Jeff
-Original Message-
From: Rick Macdougall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2003 10:21 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] clam antivirus and spamassassin
Mark Novak wrote:
>
Mark Novak wrote:
Thelv,
No problem at all.
As an aside, if anyone has figured out how to make the daemon work, I'd be
interested in knowing how they did it.
Hi,
I just wrote my own for clamd and manually put in it qmail-scanner.pl,
if you want a copy, just let me know.
Regards,
Rick
--
On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 07:51:32AM -0700, Brian W. Antoine wrote:
> would provide a way to fail more gracefully. Blocking all incoming mail might be
> an option for an individual user, but an ISP would probably want an option to
> simply let the mail flow unchecked while a warning was sent to some
Thelv,
No problem at all.
As an aside, if anyone has figured out how to make the daemon work, I'd be
interested in knowing how they did it.
Thanks,
Mark
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Thelv
Sent: Saturday, August 30, 2003 7:53 AM
To: [EMA
At 11:21 PM 9/2/03, you wrote:
>Brian W. Antoine wrote:
>>At 11:17 PM 9/2/03, you wrote:
>>
>>>On Wed, 2003-09-03 at 01:17, Brian W. Antoine wrote:
>>>
I'm on a Mandrake 9.1 system using clamav-milter with sendmail and about
once a day I find the following:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>I had the exact s
Howdy list,
My operating system is FreeBSD 4.8-RELEASE (and 5.1-RELEASE
on my devel box).
I'm currently running qmail + qmail-scanner + ClamAV, and
I'm wondering if I should be using AmaVis? I'd appreciate
it if anyone running ClamAV and qmail would share their
experience with the scanner they ch
sendmail 8.11.6-25.73
sendmail-cf 8.11.6-25.73
sendmail-devel 8.11.6-25.73
Are all installed. Do I need to upgrade to 8.12.9? I don't see
sendmail-devel available for 8.12.9 yet.
-Original Message-
From: Nigel Horne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2003 7:55 AM
To
> > > > Is this the milter fixing release?
> > > The clamd+clamav_milter duet should work more stable but this is not yet
> > > a final fix.
> > Yep, it ran for about a day -
> What about the CVS version ?
The couple of times I have tried I haven't had any luck getting the CVS
version. Can you
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 02 Sep 2003 9:42 pm, Hanson, Erik wrote:
> Red Hat Linux 7.3 on i386
On RedHat Linux you need to install the sendmail-devel RPM, since
clamav-milter requires it.
- -Nigel
- --
Nigel Horne. Arranger, Composer, Conductor, Typesetter.
Owne
> while ICAP would be a really nice addition, the problematic behaviour of
> the STREAM-extension has already been discussed (on clamav-devel) and
> tomasz promised a solution for this :-)
The new protocol in clamd will be available soon.
Best regards,
Tomasz Kojm
--
oo. [
Brian W. Antoine wrote:
At 11:17 PM 9/2/03, you wrote:
On Wed, 2003-09-03 at 01:17, Brian W. Antoine wrote:
I'm on a Mandrake 9.1 system using clamav-milter with sendmail and about
once a day I find the following:
I had the exact same problems myself, with RH 8.0 and Sendmail, using
clamav-mil
On Tue, 02 Sep 2003 at 22:55:18 -0700, Brian W. Antoine wrote:
> At 11:17 PM 9/2/03, you wrote:
> >My solution was to use Amavis-New/amavis-milter. Since getting it
> >installed and running, I have had no problems whatsoever, and it's been
> >running now for about 5 days. The nice thing about ama
Marc Balmer wrote:
Hi
I have been running clamd 0.60 for quite some time now on our mail
gateway in a milter setup (not the ClamAV milter, but our own one that
"speaks" the clamd protocol).
clamd in this version is not stable and I wonder if it is the server
part or libclamav thats causing the tro
36 matches
Mail list logo
