::Howdy list, :: ::My operating system is FreeBSD 4.8-RELEASE (and 5.1-RELEASE ::on my devel box). :: ::I'm currently running qmail + qmail-scanner + ClamAV, and ::I'm wondering if I should be using AmaVis? I'd appreciate ::it if anyone running ClamAV and qmail would share their ::experience with the scanner they chose (i.e. qmail-scanner, ::AmaVis, other) and why they chose it. :: ::I chose to go with qmail-scanner because the AmaVis project ::appears to be fragmented. I see a lot of subprojects, like ::AmaVis-ng, amavisd, etc... :: ::Also, I'm familiar with QMAILQUEUE at this point, and I ::thought I'd go with what I know. But now I'm starting to ::wonder if a daemonized scanner might give me better ::performance. :: ::Looking forward to hearing everyone's thoughts on the matter! ::Thanks.
Jesse, We are an ISP in South Alabama that is using a combination of qmail/vpopmail + ClamAV + spamassassin tied together with maildrop at the users .qmail level (under FBSD 4.8). We didn't want to do scanning on all email due to the amount of email we process daily (500K+ messages a day). We also wanted to allow the customers a certain level of control over spamassassin (user defined scores from mysql). I have several scripts (both maildrop and shell scripts for wrapping clamscan into maildrop) available if you are interested. I know this isn't exactly what you had asked, but I was offering it up as an alternative method for doing the scanning and filtering without resorting to QMAILQUEUE or other external methods (i.e. more perl overhead). Tom Walsh Network Administrator http://www.ala.net/ ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Clamav-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clamav-users
