On 2025-01-01 18:54, Jacob Bachmeyer wrote:
I am suggesting allowing /testing/ "miner" software,
not /using/ it.
That's not a rule that we can enforce. There are countermeasures to any
practical enforcement mechanism, including the mechanisms you suggested.
It's better to steer clear of this
On 1/1/25 19:23, Paul Eggert wrote:
On 2025-01-01 16:32, Jacob Bachmeyer via cfarm-users wrote:
Perhaps a combination of nice(1) and ulimit(1) would be suitable?
Not for mining, no. It would still consume resources that are better
used for cfarm's intended purposes.
The intention is to limi
On 2025-01-01 16:32, Jacob Bachmeyer via cfarm-users wrote:
Perhaps a combination of nice(1) and ulimit(1) would be suitable?
Not for mining, no. It would still consume resources that are better
used for cfarm's intended purposes.
I would suggest ... making very clear that "mining" for pr
On 1/1/25 17:25, Gregor Riepl via cfarm-users wrote:
We want nothing at all to do with any of it (well, I don't, at least),
even if not all of it is directly against the rules, does not violate
acceptable use directly: it is just distasteful.
The cfarm is supposed to be used for developing (whic
On Thu, Jan 02, 2025 at 12:25:02AM +0100, Gregor Riepl via cfarm-users wrote:
> >We want nothing at all to do with any of it (well, I don't, at least),
> >even if not all of it is directly against the rules, does not violate
> >acceptable use directly: it is just distasteful.
> >
> >The cfarm is su
We want nothing at all to do with any of it (well, I don't, at least),
even if not all of it is directly against the rules, does not violate
acceptable use directly: it is just distasteful.
The cfarm is supposed to be used for developing (which includes testing
etc.) any software that is close en
On Wed, Jan 01, 2025 at 04:34:13PM -0500, Luke Dashjr via cfarm-users wrote:
> On 1/1/25 4:25 PM, Segher Boessenkool via cfarm-users wrote:
> >"Crypto" has absolutely nothing to do with cryptography. A lot more
> >with capitalism or with casinos, it depends on your exact viewpoint :-)
> >
> >We wa
On Wed, Jan 1, 2025 at 4:26 PM Segher Boessenkool
wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 30, 2024 at 12:51:42PM -0500, Jeffrey Walton via cfarm-users
> wrote:
> > Forgive my ignorance... when you say "crypto-related," do you mean
> > just "cryptocurrency" or "mining" operations? Or does that include
> > cryptogr
Luke Dashjr wrote:
> Bitcoin is in fact very _good_ for the environment.
Nope. Read
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Environmental_impact_of_bitcoin
Bruno
___
cfarm-users mailing list
cfarm-users@lists.tetaneutral.net
https://lists.tetaneutral.net/listi
On Mon, Dec 30, 2024 at 12:51:42PM -0500, Jeffrey Walton via cfarm-users wrote:
> Forgive my ignorance... when you say "crypto-related," do you mean
> just "cryptocurrency" or "mining" operations? Or does that include
> cryptographic libraries like Botan, Crypto++ and OpenSSL.
"Crypto" has absolut
On 1/1/25 4:25 PM, Segher Boessenkool via cfarm-users wrote:
"Crypto" has absolutely nothing to do with cryptography. A lot more
with capitalism or with casinos, it depends on your exact viewpoint :-)
We want nothing at all to do with any of it (well, I don't, at least),
even if not all of it i
11 matches
Mail list logo
