We want nothing at all to do with any of it (well, I don't, at least),
even if not all of it is directly against the rules, does not violate
acceptable use directly: it is just distasteful.
The cfarm is supposed to be used for developing (which includes testing
etc.) any software that is close enough to open source, anything that
benefits user freedom and all that goodness. It is hard to see how any
klepto stuff will fit in with that, even if "technically" it is open
source.
Just to weigh in with a somewhat neutral point of view here:
I do not think it would be fair or in the interest of the general public to ban
cfarm use for specific development purposes even if they are related to
blockchain technology, cryptocurrencies and similar fields, insofar as the
infrastructure isn't (ab)used to support actual schemes.
IMHO this should be treated similarly to the GPL - there's nothing that would
stop someone from, say, building a nuclear weapon based on GPL software, even
if that's utterly despicable.[1]
[1] https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.en.html#NoMilitary
_______________________________________________
cfarm-users mailing list
cfarm-users@lists.tetaneutral.net
https://lists.tetaneutral.net/listinfo/cfarm-users
