On 2025-01-01 16:32, Jacob Bachmeyer via cfarm-users wrote:
Perhaps a combination of nice(1) and ulimit(1) would be suitable?
Not for mining, no. It would still consume resources that are better used for cfarm's intended purposes.
I would suggest ... making very clear that "mining" for profit is not permitted
That wouldn't suffice, as it's too easy for me to say that I'm not doing something for profit, when I get to define "profit". (See what many US "nonprofits" do.)
_______________________________________________ cfarm-users mailing list cfarm-users@lists.tetaneutral.net https://lists.tetaneutral.net/listinfo/cfarm-users
