Re: Logic Analysers

2017-02-03 Thread Christian Corti
On Thu, 2 Feb 2017, Adrian Graham wrote: is fixed 5v. Also you'd expect that sampling at four times the clock speed (they'll both do 25Mhz with 6 channels) then every pulse would be picked up. No, because the pulse length may be far inferiour to the sample clock rate. You may also need to capt

Re: OT: RANT (Was: [cctalk-requ...@classiccmp.org: confirm 38290c8a992491eda604beff5a06ff20cd7e85f5]

2017-02-03 Thread Raymond Wiker
On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 2:51 AM, Ian S. King wrote: > On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 4:24 PM, geneb wrote: > > > On Thu, 2 Feb 2017, Ian Finder wrote: > > > > WTF did I just read. > >> > >> Fred in absolutely rare form. I nearly choked on coffee at the > "yodeling > > jellyfish" bit. I'd give him fake i

Re: Logic Analysers

2017-02-03 Thread Adrian Graham
On 03/02/2017 08:01, "Christian Corti" wrote: > On Thu, 2 Feb 2017, Adrian Graham wrote: >> is fixed 5v. Also you'd expect that sampling at four times the clock speed >> (they'll both do 25Mhz with 6 channels) then every pulse would be picked up. > > No, because the pulse length may be far infer

Re: RL02 version of UNIX6?

2017-02-03 Thread Paul Koning
> On Feb 2, 2017, at 11:19 PM, william degnan wrote: > > ... > I am curious to see what OS's run on an 11/40 without the EIS card other > than RT-11. I am researching this. I have always wanted to learn more > about batch-11. You mean DOS/BATCH? Yes, that would run on that machine, it's an

HP Integral PC Accessories?

2017-02-03 Thread Martin.Hepperle
Hi, I am looking to swap or buy the following HP-Integral IPC (portable HP-UX box) interface boards: - HP-IL interface - 1 MB memory board Does anybody have a manual for the HP-IL interface board? Could offer HP 9000 interface or memory boards. Martin

Re: RL02 version of UNIX6?

2017-02-03 Thread Noel Chiappa
> From: William Degnan > my focus has been on just getting an 11/40 hardware working Rightly and properly so... > I suppose I should be happy with RT-11 given my circumstances. Unix really is a significant improvement, we really need to make sure you can run it. Don't worry about th

Re: OT: RANT (Was: [cctalk-requ...@classiccmp.org: confirm 38290c8a992491eda604beff5a06ff20cd7e85f5]

2017-02-03 Thread geneb
On Thu, 2 Feb 2017, Ian S. King wrote: On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 4:24 PM, geneb wrote: On Thu, 2 Feb 2017, Ian Finder wrote: WTF did I just read. Fred in absolutely rare form. I nearly choked on coffee at the "yodeling jellyfish" bit. I'd give him fake internet points if I could. :) Also,

Re: Logic Analysers

2017-02-03 Thread Tony Duell
On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 8:55 AM, Adrian Graham wrote: > Ah yes, sorry, I'm aware of that. What I meant in this specific case is that > with 4 2764s right next to each other with a direct signal path between > adjacent address and data pins that has a resistance of 0.5 ohms pin to pin > surely I sh

Re: RL02 version of UNIX6?

2017-02-03 Thread John Forecast
> On Feb 3, 2017, at 8:22 AM, Paul Koning wrote: > > >> On Feb 2, 2017, at 11:19 PM, william degnan wrote: >> >> ... >> I am curious to see what OS's run on an 11/40 without the EIS card other >> than RT-11. I am researching this. I have always wanted to learn more >> about batch-11. > >

Re: RL02 version of UNIX6?

2017-02-03 Thread william degnan
On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 8:57 AM, Noel Chiappa wrote: > > From: William Degnan > > > my focus has been on just getting an 11/40 hardware working > > Rightly and properly so... > > > I suppose I should be happy with RT-11 given my circumstances. > > Unix really is a significant improveme

Re: Logic Analysers

2017-02-03 Thread Jon Elson
On 02/03/2017 02:55 AM, Adrian Graham wrote: Ah yes, sorry, I'm aware of that. What I meant in this specific case is that with 4 2764s right next to each other with a direct signal path between adjacent address and data pins that has a resistance of 0.5 ohms pin to pin surely I should be able

Re: Logic Analysers

2017-02-03 Thread dwight
Different strokes for different folks. I've only used a logic analyzer once and even for that I found it cumbersome and inadequate. I needed it to solve a sequential problem that had a lot of time sequential actions. Things like is does this, then this, then that. Ignore it and restart if it d

Re: RL02 version of UNIX6?

2017-02-03 Thread william degnan
On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 11:18 AM, John Forecast wrote: > > > On Feb 3, 2017, at 8:22 AM, Paul Koning wrote: > > > > > > > paul > > > It looks as though Bill only has RL02 drives on the 11/40 so that would > rule out DOS/BATCH. One of the later 3.x releases of RSX-11M should be OK > (4.x see

Re: RL02 version of UNIX6?

2017-02-03 Thread Noel Chiappa
> From: Paul Koning > Another OS that would run on your machine (as well as an 11/20) would > be RSTS-11 (V4, or I suppose V3 if you can find that) I'd love to have an old RSTS-11, is there any variant around? > didn't use the MMU Huh? He's got an MMU (I think): it's the EIS he'

Re: Logic Analysers

2017-02-03 Thread Tony Duell
On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 4:46 PM, dwight wrote: > Different strokes for different folks. Yes. It depends a lot on what you work on, what you are trying to do, and how you think. This is a problem with mailing lists. There are many knowledgeable people here, but each has their own way of doing thin

Re: Logic Analysers

2017-02-03 Thread Paul Berger
On 2017-02-03 12:41 PM, Jon Elson wrote: On 02/03/2017 02:55 AM, Adrian Graham wrote: Ah yes, sorry, I'm aware of that. What I meant in this specific case is that with 4 2764s right next to each other with a direct signal path between adjacent address and data pins that has a resistance of 0

Re: RL02 version of UNIX6?

2017-02-03 Thread John Forecast
> On Feb 3, 2017, at 11:50 AM, william degnan wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 11:18 AM, John Forecast wrote: > >> >>> On Feb 3, 2017, at 8:22 AM, Paul Koning wrote: >>> >> >>> >>> paul >>> >> It looks as though Bill only has RL02 drives on the 11/40 so that would >> rule out DOS/B

Re: Logic Analysers

2017-02-03 Thread jim stephens
On 2/3/2017 9:09 AM, Paul Berger wrote: I also have a 16700A, 16600A, and a 16500C but they are rarely if ever used these days. Paul. the 16600A has one slot. We had one with a scope card installed, very nice compact setup if the builtin channels were sufficient. thanks jim

Re: RL02 version of UNIX6?

2017-02-03 Thread Charles Dickman
On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 11:20 AM, william degnan wrote: > I am > familiar with the database of tests online that has many but no KE11-E > M7238 EIS Diagnostics...Sorry to have to ask, I checked what places I know > of, WWW search etc. Can anyone suggest the name of the test so I can run > it? > I

Re: RL02 version of UNIX6?

2017-02-03 Thread william degnan
> > > > Bill > > RSX-11M V3.2 supports RL02s and bitsavers has images of the 3.2 RL01 > distribution disks. I’m not sure if those will boot if copied to an RL02. > > John. > > I saw that, and was thinking the same thing b

Re: RL02 version of UNIX6?

2017-02-03 Thread william degnan
On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 12:37 PM, Charles Dickman wrote: > On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 11:20 AM, william degnan > wrote: > > I am > > familiar with the database of tests online that has many but no KE11-E > > M7238 EIS Diagnostics...Sorry to have to ask, I checked what places I > know > > of, WWW sear

Re: RL02 version of UNIX6?

2017-02-03 Thread william degnan
On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 12:59 PM, william degnan wrote: > > > >> > >> > Bill >> >> RSX-11M V3.2 supports RL02s and bitsavers has images of the 3.2 RL01 >> distribution disks. I’m not sure if those will boot if copied to an RL02. >> >> John. >> >> > I saw that, and was thinking the same thing > b

Re: OT: RANT (Was: [cctalk-requ...@classiccmp.org: confirm 38290c8a992491eda604beff5a06ff20cd7e85f5]

2017-02-03 Thread Liam Proven
On 2 February 2017 at 23:21, Fred Cisin wrote: > Frankly, it SCARES me that that wasn't absurd enough! A friend of mine, Charlie Stross, recently had to rewrite the outline of a novel because his bleak dystopian vision of the near-future "free world" wasn't _nearly_ bleak enough and the actual w

Re: OT: RANT (Was: [cctalk-requ...@classiccmp.org: confirm 38290c8a992491eda604beff5a06ff20cd7e85f5]

2017-02-03 Thread Josh Miller
> A friend of mine, Charlie Stross I love this. Mr. Stross's work is a favorite of mine. The laundry files are particularly crunchy. The Internet is awesome.

Re: Logic Analysers

2017-02-03 Thread Adrian Graham
On 03/02/2017 15:27, "Tony Duell" wrote: > On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 8:55 AM, Adrian Graham > wrote: > >> Ah yes, sorry, I'm aware of that. What I meant in this specific case is that >> with 4 2764s right next to each other with a direct signal path between >> adjacent address and data pins that h

Re: OT: RANT (Was: [cctalk-requ...@classiccmp.org: confirm 38290c8a992491eda604beff5a06ff20cd7e85f5]

2017-02-03 Thread Liam Proven
On 3 February 2017 at 19:32, Josh Miller wrote: > I love this. Mr. Stross's work is a favorite of mine. The laundry > files are particularly crunchy. The Internet is awesome. He's a superb writer. I have all of his books up to about 2012, because he gave me copies of them last time I visited

Re: Logic Analysers

2017-02-03 Thread Paul Berger
On 2017-02-03 1:23 PM, jim stephens wrote: On 2/3/2017 9:09 AM, Paul Berger wrote: I also have a 16700A, 16600A, and a 16500C but they are rarely if ever used these days. Paul. the 16600A has one slot. We had one with a scope card installed, very nice compact setup if the builtin channe

Re: Logic Analysers

2017-02-03 Thread Adrian Graham
On 03/02/2017 16:41, "Jon Elson" wrote: > On 02/03/2017 02:55 AM, Adrian Graham wrote: >> Ah yes, sorry, I'm aware of that. What I meant in this >> specific case is that with 4 2764s right next to each >> other with a direct signal path between adjacent address >> and data pins that has a resista

Re: Logic Analysers

2017-02-03 Thread dwight
I think Tony's statement about the key thing to know about trouble shouting is to know what it should be doing. If you don't know that, no scope or logic analyzer with help much. Dwight From: cctalk on behalf of Tony Duell Sent: Friday, February 3, 2017 9:06

Re: Logic Analysers

2017-02-03 Thread Mouse
>> the propagation delay as the signal gets to each pin (remember a >> foot is about a nanosecond. [...]) Not really. A foot is about a light-nanosecond, yes, but high-frequency signals in copper travel by skin effect, moving significantly more slowly - somewhere around .6c, I think it is. It's

Re: RL02 version of UNIX6?

2017-02-03 Thread Paul Koning
> On Feb 3, 2017, at 12:00 PM, Noel Chiappa wrote: > >> From: Paul Koning > >> Another OS that would run on your machine (as well as an 11/20) would >> be RSTS-11 (V4, or I suppose V3 if you can find that) > > I'd love to have an old RSTS-11, is there any variant around? Yes, on bitsavers. B

Re: Logic Analysers

2017-02-03 Thread Tony Duell
On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 7:35 PM, Mouse wrote: >>> the propagation delay as the signal gets to each pin (remember a >>> foot is about a nanosecond. [...]) > > Not really. A foot is about a light-nanosecond, yes, but > high-frequency signals in copper travel by skin effect, moving > significantly m

Re: Logic Analysers

2017-02-03 Thread Tony Duell
On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 7:04 PM, dwight wrote: > I think Tony's statement about the key thing to know about > > trouble shouting is to know what it should be doing. > > If you don't know that, no scope or logic analyzer with help much. Yes. I once explained faultfinding in this way. The technical

Re: Logic Analysers

2017-02-03 Thread Paul Koning
> On Feb 3, 2017, at 2:43 PM, Tony Duell wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 7:35 PM, Mouse wrote: the propagation delay as the signal gets to each pin (remember a foot is about a nanosecond. [...]) >> >> Not really. A foot is about a light-nanosecond, yes, but >> high-frequency sign

Re: Logic Analysers

2017-02-03 Thread Eric Smith
On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 12:47 PM, Tony Duell wrote: > There is no magic box that you plug into a computer and it tells > you 'U5 is faulty'. At least not in general. > Hmmm... I think I'll make a box that you plug into a computer and it tells you 'U5 is faulty'. It won't be magic, though... :-)

Re: Logic Analysers

2017-02-03 Thread jim stephens
On 2/3/2017 11:58 AM, Eric Smith wrote: On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 12:47 PM, Tony Duell wrote: There is no magic box that you plug into a computer and it tells you 'U5 is faulty'. At least not in general. Hmmm... I think I'll make a box that you plug into a computer and it tells you 'U5 is fa

Re: Logic Analysers

2017-02-03 Thread Tony Duell
On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 7:58 PM, Eric Smith wrote: > On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 12:47 PM, Tony Duell wrote: > >> There is no magic box that you plug into a computer and it tells >> you 'U5 is faulty'. At least not in general. >> > > Hmmm... > > I think I'll make a box that you plug into a computer and

Re: Logic Analysers

2017-02-03 Thread Tony Duell
On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 8:08 PM, jim stephens wrote: > > > On 2/3/2017 11:58 AM, Eric Smith wrote: >> >> On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 12:47 PM, Tony Duell wrote: >> >>> There is no magic box that you plug into a computer and it tells >>> you 'U5 is faulty'. At least not in general. >>> >> Hmmm... >> >>

Re: RL02 version of UNIX6?

2017-02-03 Thread william degnan
On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 2:31 PM, Paul Koning wrote: > > > On Feb 3, 2017, at 12:00 PM, Noel Chiappa > wrote: > > > >> From: Paul Koning > > > >> Another OS that would run on your machine (as well as an 11/20) would > >> be RSTS-11 (V4, or I suppose V3 if you can find that) > > > > I'd love to hav

Re: Logic Analysers

2017-02-03 Thread Fred Cisin
On Fri, 3 Feb 2017, Eric Smith wrote: Hmmm... I think I'll make a box that you plug into a computer and it tells you 'U5 is faulty'. It won't be magic, though... :-) Other than plugging in to the computer (USB?), the rest of it could probably be done in software. What would the "System Requ

Re: RL02 version of UNIX6?

2017-02-03 Thread william degnan
> > > > I was able to get the extended three cables so I can put the M7238 EIS > card on a riser so I can probe for faults, and maybe if I am lucky boot > XXDP+. With the EIN installed I can't boot RT-11 > > I mean EIS, not EIN.

Re: RL02 version of UNIX6?

2017-02-03 Thread Paul Koning
> On Feb 3, 2017, at 3:25 PM, william degnan wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 2:31 PM, Paul Koning wrote: > >> >>> On Feb 3, 2017, at 12:00 PM, Noel Chiappa >> wrote: >>> From: Paul Koning >>> Another OS that would run on your machine (as well as an 11/20) would be RSTS-11

Re: Logic Analysers

2017-02-03 Thread Paul Berger
On 2017-02-03 3:47 PM, Tony Duell wrote: On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 7:04 PM, dwight wrote: I think Tony's statement about the key thing to know about trouble shouting is to know what it should be doing. If you don't know that, no scope or logic analyzer with help much. Yes. I once explained fa

Re: Logic Analysers

2017-02-03 Thread Tony Duell
> > ...And if you don't have a schematic, you ring out the connections and draw > your own... Given the number of times I've done that, I half-feel like mentioning a grandmother and sucking eggs ;-) More seriously, to draw out a useful schematic -- not just one that shows what is connected to wha

Re: Logic Analysers

2017-02-03 Thread Eric Smith
On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 1:25 PM, Fred Cisin wrote: > On Fri, 3 Feb 2017, Eric Smith wrote: > >> Hmmm... >> I think I'll make a box that you plug into a computer and it tells you 'U5 >> is faulty'. >> It won't be magic, though... >> :-) >> > > Other than plugging in to the computer (USB?), the rest

Re: Logic Analysers

2017-02-03 Thread Charles Anthony
On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 12:43 PM, Eric Smith wrote: > On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 1:25 PM, Fred Cisin wrote: > > > > What would the "System Requirements" be? > > Would it also advise me that both my hardware and my OS are out-of-date, > > and need to be upgraded? > > > > I'll add that in a future upgr

Re: Logic Analysers

2017-02-03 Thread dwight
I once worked with a device that came close to telling you that U15 was failing. It was called a signature analyzer. It was good as a first pass production tester. It was not something I'd expect a hobbyist to use. It needed a pin bed to match the board under test. It wasn't good enough to ca

Re: RL02 version of UNIX6?

2017-02-03 Thread william degnan
> > > >> > >> > > So you're saying for a system with a MMU but no working EIS (removed for > > now) and 64KW RAM (half populated M7891) you're suggesting which OS? I > > still have to research the best options, RSX-11M? > > I'm not sure there is one. DEC OS designers typically would assume that >

Re: Logic Analysers

2017-02-03 Thread Adrian Graham
On 03/02/2017 20:38, "Paul Berger" wrote: >> As I have said before, the most important piece of test gear is a >> brain. >> >> -tony > ...And if you don't have a schematic, you ring out the connections and > draw your own... I'm not yet skilled enough to draw a schematic but I've drawn out a co

Re: RL02 version of UNIX6?

2017-02-03 Thread Josh Dersch
On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 12:31 PM, Paul Koning wrote: > > > > I'm not sure there is one. DEC OS designers typically would assume that > they are dealing with non-broken systems. Systems with MMU all have EIS... > Is this actually true? I've been working on getting my PDP-11/40 running recently,

RE: RL02 version of UNIX6?

2017-02-03 Thread Jay West
Will wrote... -- OK. Hopefully I can repair my EIS board then. Otherwise it's RT-11. -- Don't forget the RT-11 + TSX+ option, very nice timesharing system. http://tsxplus.classiccmp.org

Re: Logic Analysers

2017-02-03 Thread Eric Smith
On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 2:00 PM, dwight wrote: > I once worked with a device that came close to telling you > that U15 was failing. > > It was called a signature analyzer. > It was good as a first pass production tester. > It required that the device under test be put in a state where the signals

Re: RL02 version of UNIX6?

2017-02-03 Thread Paul Koning
> On Feb 3, 2017, at 4:07 PM, Josh Dersch wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 12:31 PM, Paul Koning wrote: > >> >> >> >> I'm not sure there is one. DEC OS designers typically would assume that >> they are dealing with non-broken systems. Systems with MMU all have EIS... >> > > Is this act

Re: RL02 version of UNIX6?

2017-02-03 Thread Josh Dersch
On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 1:17 PM, Paul Koning wrote: > > > On Feb 3, 2017, at 4:07 PM, Josh Dersch wrote: > > > > On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 12:31 PM, Paul Koning > wrote: > > > >> > >> > >> > >> I'm not sure there is one. DEC OS designers typically would assume that > >> they are dealing with non-b

Re: Logic Analysers

2017-02-03 Thread Paul Berger
On 2017-02-03 4:41 PM, Tony Duell wrote: ...And if you don't have a schematic, you ring out the connections and draw your own... Given the number of times I've done that, I half-feel like mentioning a grandmother and sucking eggs ;-) More seriously, to draw out a useful schematic -- not just

Re: RL02 version of UNIX6?

2017-02-03 Thread Paul Koning
> On Feb 3, 2017, at 4:28 PM, Josh Dersch wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 1:17 PM, Paul Koning wrote: > >> ... >> What I meant is that the 11/40 has EIS standard, according to the PDP11 >> architecture handbook. So an OS that depends on MMU would be designed for >> 11/40, 11/45, etc. all of

Re: Logic Analysers

2017-02-03 Thread Paul Berger
On 2017-02-03 5:05 PM, Adrian Graham wrote: On 03/02/2017 20:38, "Paul Berger" wrote: As I have said before, the most important piece of test gear is a brain. -tony ...And if you don't have a schematic, you ring out the connections and draw your own... I'm not yet skilled enough to draw a

Re: RL02 version of UNIX6?

2017-02-03 Thread Noel Chiappa
> From: William Degnan > I was able to get the extended three cables Excellent! > I can put the M7238 EIS card on a riser so I can probe for faults I'm all agog to hear what you find out! > and maybe if I am lucky boot XXDP+. With the EIN installed I can't boot I thought the m

RE: Logic Analysers

2017-02-03 Thread Rob Jarratt
> 3) An HP1630. I forget which one, probably a 1630G. It does all I want. I was > also AFAIK the last HP LA to have a proper component-level service manual. > It's also a classic computer in its own right (6809 + 6829 MMU). Oddly the CRT > is scanned vertically, I have no idea why. > Hello Tony,

Re: RL02 version of UNIX6?

2017-02-03 Thread Eric Smith
On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 2:35 PM, Paul Koning wrote: > I saw that stated earlier, too, but DEC's PDP11 architecture handbook > doesn't appear to confirm that. Either that or the model differences table > is sloppy. > The model differences table is definitely sloppy. There are discrepancies betwe

Re: Logic Analysers

2017-02-03 Thread Adrian Graham
On 03/02/2017 19:43, "Tony Duell" wrote: > But that's why I said 'about'. I am doing order-of-magnitude calculations, > not trying to design a delay line. I would estimate that between adjacent > ICs on the same board you'd get a delay measured in 10's or 100's of > picoseconds. That sort of orde

Re: Logic Analysers

2017-02-03 Thread dwight
Adrian What you see on the other select line is what is called a glitch. These are not that uncommon during the early part of the address. What is important is that there are no glitchs when ALE transitions. Dwight From: cctalk on behalf of Adrian Graham S

Re: OT: RANT (Was: [cctalk-requ...@classiccmp.org: confirm 38290c8a992491eda604beff5a06ff20cd7e85f5]

2017-02-03 Thread Alexander Schreiber
On Fri, Feb 03, 2017 at 07:28:21PM +0100, Liam Proven wrote: > On 2 February 2017 at 23:21, Fred Cisin wrote: > > Frankly, it SCARES me that that wasn't absurd enough! > > > A friend of mine, Charlie Stross, recently had to rewrite the outline > of a novel because his bleak dystopian vision of t

Re: Logic Analysers

2017-02-03 Thread Adrian Graham
On 03/02/2017 23:29, "dwight" wrote: > Adrian > > What you see on the other select line is what is called a glitch. > > These are not that uncommon during the early part of the address. > > What is important is that there are no glitchs when ALE transitions. Ah, ok, there's a glitch filter t

Re: OT: RANT (Was: [cctalk-requ...@classiccmp.org: confirm 38290c8a992491eda604beff5a06ff20cd7e85f5]

2017-02-03 Thread Ian S. King
On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 5:55 AM, geneb wrote: > On Thu, 2 Feb 2017, Ian S. King wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 4:24 PM, geneb wrote: >> >> On Thu, 2 Feb 2017, Ian Finder wrote: >>> >>> WTF did I just read. >>> Fred in absolutely rare form. I nearly choked on coffee at the "yode

Re: RL02 version of UNIX6?

2017-02-03 Thread Ethan Dicks
On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 4:17 PM, Paul Koning wrote: > Not necessarily MUL, in a kernel, but definitely SOB. I've run into needing SOB just between the PDP-11/04 and PDP11/34. -ethan

Re: Logic Analysers

2017-02-03 Thread dwight
I'm not sure you want to hide glitches. There are times when you might want to see them. It is more about knowing when a glitch has meaning and when it doesn't. Dwight From: cctalk on behalf of Adrian Graham Sent: Friday, February 3, 2017 3:46:32 PM To: Gene

Re: Logic Analysers

2017-02-03 Thread Chuck Guzis
On 02/03/2017 04:10 PM, dwight wrote: > I'm not sure you want to hide glitches. There are times > > when you might want to see them. > > It is more about knowing when a glitch has meaning and when it > doesn't. Indeed. That's one of the the things that impressed me about the early HP 1615 logic

Re: Logic Analysers

2017-02-03 Thread Jon Elson
On 02/03/2017 01:35 PM, Mouse wrote: the propagation delay as the signal gets to each pin (remember a foot is about a nanosecond. [...]) Not really. A foot is about a light-nanosecond, yes, but high-frequency signals in copper travel by skin effect, moving significantly more slowly - somewhere

Re: Logic Analysers

2017-02-03 Thread Jon Elson
On 02/03/2017 04:34 PM, Adrian Graham wrote: On 03/02/2017 19:43, "Tony Duell" wrote: But that's why I said 'about'. I am doing order-of-magnitude calculations, not trying to design a delay line. I would estimate that between adjacent ICs on the same board you'd get a delay measured in 10's or

11/44, parts, 11/24, DZ11

2017-02-03 Thread Paul Anderson
I have at least one 11/44 for sale, at least one 11/24 for sale. I can configure them as needed within reason. They can be packed and shipped as freight carrier of your choice or pickup in IL. or IN. Please contact me off list. Also the following parts: M7090 M7094 M7095 M7096 M7097 M7098 $300/

Re: Logic Analysers

2017-02-03 Thread dwight
All the glitches are at the beginning of the ALE. There is nothing there that has any meaning. Things are changing at this time. Not every thing changes at the same rate. That is why they have an ALE to mark when the address is good. When high, the circuit address latch is open. When ALE goes l

Re: Logic Analysers

2017-02-03 Thread dwight
Remember what both Tony and I said earlier. You have to know what is suppose to be happening. Just probing around, looking for something funny looking is not usually very fruitful. You really need to spend some time looking at data sheets. Dwight From: dwight