cctalk  

Messages by Thread

• [cctalk] VCF EAST CONSIGNMENT HAS A BIGGER SPACE! - April 4-6, 2025 - Wall, NJ Jeffrey Brace via cctalk
• [cctalk] Indius Java components silcreval via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: Indius Java components Liam Proven via cctalk
• [cctalk] DEC CP11-U (M7824) Documentation? Christian Gauger-Cosgrove via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: DEC CP11-U (M7824) Documentation? Paul Koning via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: DEC CP11-U (M7824) Documentation? Christian Gauger-Cosgrove via cctalk
• [cctalk] VCF West 2025 Survey - Mountain View, California Jeffrey Brace via cctalk
• [cctalk] Re: ROM to Flash Adapter for HP Portable PC ROM Drawer help Martin.Hepperle--- via cctalk
• [cctalk] Need a dot-matrix impact printer? Van Snyder via cctalk
• [cctalk] IDT 49C402BG84 Pinout? Holm Tiffe via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: IDT 49C402BG84 Pinout? Wayne S via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: IDT 49C402BG84 Pinout? Will Cooke via cctalk
  • [cctalk] ROM to Flash Adapter for HP Portable PC ROM Drawer help Mike Katz via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: ROM to Flash Adapter for HP Portable PC ROM Drawer help brain--- via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: ROM to Flash Adapter for HP Portable PC ROM Drawer help Tony Duell via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: IDT 49C402BG84 Pinout? Holm Tiffe via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: IDT 49C402BG84 Pinout? Glen Slick via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: IDT 49C402BG84 Pinout? Holm Tiffe via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: IDT 49C402BG84 Pinout? ben via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: IDT 49C402BG84 Pinout? Holm Tiffe via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: IDT 49C402BG84 Pinout? ben via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: IDT 49C402BG84 Pinout? Holm Tiffe via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: IDT 49C402BG84 Pinout? ben via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: IDT 49C402BG84 Pinout? Holm Tiffe via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: IDT 49C402BG84 Pinout? Martin Bishop via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: IDT 49C402BG84 Pinout? emanuel stiebler via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: IDT 49C402BG84 Pinout? ben via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: IDT 49C402BG84 Pinout? Holm Tiffe via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: IDT 49C402BG84 Pinout? Jon Elson via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: IDT 49C402BG84 Pinout? Holm Tiffe via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: IDT 49C402BG84 Pinout? Paul Koning via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: IDT 49C402BG84 Pinout? Holm Tiffe via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: IDT 49C402BG84 Pinout? Jon Elson via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: IDT 49C402BG84 Pinout? Martin Bishop via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: IDT 49C402BG84 Pinout? ben via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: IDT 49C402BG84 Pinout? Paul Koning via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: IDT 49C402BG84 Pinout? ben via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: IDT 49C402BG84 Pinout? Paul Koning via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: IDT 49C402BG84 Pinout? Paul Koning via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: IDT 49C402BG84 Pinout? ben via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: IDT 49C402BG84 Pinout? Martin Bishop via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: IDT 49C402BG84 Pinout? Paul Koning via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: IDT 49C402BG84 Pinout? Christian Corti via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: IDT 49C402BG84 Pinout? Jon Elson via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: IDT 49C402BG84 Pinout? Martin Bishop via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: IDT 49C402BG84 Pinout? Holm Tiffe via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: IDT 49C402BG84 Pinout? ben via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: IDT 49C402BG84 Pinout? Jon Elson via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: IDT 49C402BG84 Pinout? Holm Tiffe via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: IDT 49C402BG84 Pinout? Jon Elson via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: IDT 49C402BG84 Pinout? Holm Tiffe via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: IDT 49C402BG84 Pinout? Jon Elson via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: IDT 49C402BG84 Pinout? Holm Tiffe via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: IDT 49C402BG84 Pinout? ben via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: IDT 49C402BG84 Pinout? Fred Cisin via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: IDT 49C402BG84 Pinout? ben via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: IDT 49C402BG84 Pinout? Paul Koning via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: IDT 49C402BG84 Pinout? Mike Stein via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: IDT 49C402BG84 Pinout? Glen Slick via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: IDT 49C402BG84 Pinout? Mike Stein via cctalk
• [cctalk] Vendor for data recovery from TK50 and TK25 tapes? dbrock--- via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: Vendor for data recovery from TK50 and TK25 tapes? Zane Healy via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: Vendor for data recovery from TK50 and TK25 tapes? cz via cctalk
• [cctalk] networking on CTOS r.stricklin via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: networking on CTOS Christopher Zach via cctalk
• [cctalk] VCF East 2025 tickets now on sale! Jeffrey Brace via cctalk
• [cctalk] FYI: The ongoing, 40 years long search for Aleph Null Tomasz Rola via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: FYI: The ongoing, 40 years long search for Aleph Null William Sudbrink via cctalk
• [cctalk] Thousands of new Data General documents added to the on-line archives... Bruce Ray via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: Thousands of new Data General documents added to the on-line archives... Dominique Carlier via cctalk
• [cctalk] VCF Montréal Survey Jeffrey Brace via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: VCF Montréal Survey Jeffrey Brace via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: VCF Montréal Survey Mike Kenzie via cctalk
• [cctalk] Rainbow 100A Video Fault (also posted on VCF) Rob Jarratt via cctalk
• [cctalk] Anybody need a dot matrix impact printer? Van Snyder via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: Anybody need a dot matrix impact printer? Liam Proven via cctalk
• [cctalk] IBM 4506 (old message) Tommy Chang via cctalk
• [cctalk] Re: Classic computers with more than one stack pointer, but not FORTH machines. John via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: Classic computers with more than one stack pointer, but not FORTH machines. John via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: Classic computers with more than one stack pointer, but not FORTH machines. ben via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: Classic computers with more than one stack pointer, but not FORTH machines. Paul Koning via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: Classic computers with more than one stack pointer, but not FORTH machines. Wayne S via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: Classic computers with more than one stack pointer, but not FORTH machines. ben via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: Classic computers with more than one stack pointer, but not FORTH machines. Paul Koning via cctalk
• [cctalk] HAWLEY X063X Mark II and XEROX Star mice hupfadekroua via cctalk
• [cctalk] VCF SoCal 2025 recap Steve Lewis via cctalk
• [cctalk] Classic computers with more than one stack pointer, but not FORTH machines. ben via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: Classic computers with more than one stack pointer, but not FORTH machines. Paul Koning via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: Classic computers with more than one stack pointer, but not FORTH machines. Frank Leonhardt via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: Classic computers with more than one stack pointer, but not FORTH machines. StricK via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: Classic computers with more than one stack pointer, but not FORTH machines. Paul Koning via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: Classic computers with more than one stack pointer, but not FORTH machines. Chuck Guzis via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: Classic computers with more than one stack pointer, but not FORTH machines. ben via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: Classic computers with more than one stack pointer, but not FORTH machines. Mike Katz via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: Classic computers with more than one stack pointer, but not FORTH machines. Mike Katz via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: Classic computers with more than one stack pointer, but not FORTH machines. Jon Elson via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: Classic computers with more than one stack pointer, but not FORTH machines. Martin Bishop via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: Classic computers with more than one stack pointer, but not FORTH machines. Frank Leonhardt via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: Classic computers with more than one stack pointer, but not FORTH machines. jim stephens via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: Classic computers with more than one stack pointer, but not FORTH machines. Gavin Scott via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: Classic computers with more than one stack pointer, but not FORTH machines. Chuck Guzis via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: Classic computers with more than one stack pointer, but not FORTH machines. StricK via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: Classic computers with more than one stack pointer, but not FORTH machines. Mike Katz via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: Classic computers with more than one stack pointer, but not FORTH machines. Paul Koning via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: Classic computers with more than one stack pointer, but not FORTH machines. Chuck Guzis via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: Classic computers with more than one stack pointer, but not FORTH machines. Christian Corti via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: Classic computers with more than one stack pointer, but not FORTH machines. Mike Katz via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: Classic computers with more than one stack pointer, but not FORTH machines. Paul Koning via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: Classic computers with more than one stack pointer, but not FORTH machines. paul.kimpel--- via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: Classic computers with more than one stack pointer, but not FORTH machines. Paul Koning via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: Classic computers with more than one stack pointer, but not FORTH machines. paul.kimpel--- via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: Classic computers with more than one stack pointer, but not FORTH machines. Jonathan Stone via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: Classic computers with more than one stack pointer, but not FORTH machines. paul.kimpel--- via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: Classic computers with more than one stack pointer, but not FORTH machines. Milo Velimirović via cctalk
• [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Dr. Erik Baigar via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Paul McJones via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Van Snyder via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Paul McJones via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Paul McJones via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Paul McJones via cctalk
• [cctalk] "Re: Re: Elliott Algol" Paul Pierce via cctalk
• [cctalk] Dan Sokol (and bits about the Apple I and the 6502 procurement) Jim Brain via cctalk
• [cctalk] Elliott Algol Frank Leonhardt via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Sid Jones via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Van Snyder via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Frank Leonhardt via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Van Snyder via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol David Wise via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Frank Leonhardt via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Martin Bishop via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Adrian Stoness via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Frank Leonhardt via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Adrian Stoness via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Van Snyder via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Wayne S via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Paul Koning via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Van Snyder via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Chuck Guzis via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Van Snyder via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Chuck Guzis via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Warner Losh via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Van Snyder via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol paul.kimpel--- via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Chuck Guzis via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Henry Bent via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Adrian Stoness via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Jon Elson via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Frank Leonhardt via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol ben via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Johan Helsingius via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol ben via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Van Snyder via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol paul.kimpel--- via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol David Wade via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Frank Leonhardt via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Paul Koning via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol ben via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Paul Koning via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol ben via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Chuck Guzis via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol ben via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Paul Koning via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Van Snyder via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol paul.kimpel--- via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Paul Koning via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol paul.kimpel--- via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Paul Koning via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol ben via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Paul Koning via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Peter Corlett via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Paul Koning via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Van Snyder via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Paul Koning via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Van Snyder via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Paul Koning via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Chuck Guzis via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Van Snyder via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Paul Koning via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Chuck Guzis via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Paul Koning via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Chuck Guzis via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Gary Grebus via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Paul Koning via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Chuck Guzis via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Gary Grebus via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Van Snyder via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Ken Seefried via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Van Snyder via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Jon Elson via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Frank Leonhardt via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Frank Leonhardt via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Adrian Stoness via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Jon Elson via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol David Wise via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Van Snyder via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Curious Marc via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Christian Corti via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol paul.kimpel--- via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Christian Corti via cctalk
  • [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Van Snyder via cctalk

• Earlier messages