what about if you run a 2-D FFT rather than 2-D FFT, if your hand drawing map
in on a 2-D paper?
> On Apr 28, 2023, at 10:48 AM, James Holton wrote:
>
> Its still April, but this one isn't a joke.
>
> The smiley-face electron density in the left panel of the attached image has
> the remarkabl
If data processing to be ok and all possible monoclinic and orthorombic SG gave unreasonable high Rs, maybe good to give a try with p1 space group? Since the p-lattice indexing gave same a and b also very close alpha and beta, it could not exclude the possibility of p1 then twinned (also together
from my iPhoneOn Mar 19, 2023, at 11:30 PM, Lijun Liu wrote:James:Sent from my iPhoneOn Mar 19, 2023, at 2:37 PM, James Holton wrote:
They say one test is worth a thousand expert opinions, so I tried my
hand at the former.
The question is: what is the right way to
James:Sent from my iPhoneOn Mar 19, 2023, at 2:37 PM, James Holton wrote:
They say one test is worth a thousand expert opinions, so I tried my
hand at the former.
The question is: what is the right way to treat disordered side
chains?:
a) omit atoms you cann
racting side chains will almost certainly have different orientations,
> which necessitates a twinning of the whole structure.
> Best,
> Herman
>
> Von: CCP4 bulletin board Im Auftrag von Lijun Liu
> Gesendet: Freitag, 27. August 2021 14:22
> An: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
>
I believe it is a twin from P32.
Not like the assignment of double conformations with partial occupancies to
small part of asu, for examples, a side chain of lysin or a small fragment of a
protein, which have both conformations stayed in the same specific asu at the
same time. For this p3221 a
r. D74, 215-227
=
Obviously, the Journal information of the two got swapped. Also, for
the top one, Author Carlon A.'s name was missing.
You guys did great job, and deserve correct citations!
Best regards,
Lijun Li
Not sure if it is of the taste but I sometimes joked like:
==
It is a complex that it is a complex when a ligand rather than a water
binds there.
I worry about data security when running TLS, so to computer security
when using TNT.
I keep solving important structure
(both supported in Phenix).
Pavel
On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 5:09 PM, Lijun Liu <mailto:lijunli...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hi: this must be an old problem but I would like to know if there
are other ideas to make things easier.
I solved a structure that contains 240 helices of identical
Hi: this must be an old problem but I would like to know if there are other
ideas to make things easier.
I solved a structure that contains 240 helices of identical sequences in the
asymmetric unit. Handling so many chains is really a headache as pdb contains
only a single column for chain ID
tried to generate an input script from ccp4i running. Unfortunately,
running with the particular "superpose using S-S-M" option did not
generate an input card (other options OK, what a bad luck).
I appreciate a working script (ccp46.4.0) or a "debugged" source code
for compilation. Thanks.
Lijun Liu
Hi, Pc may not be the space group for your crystal, if the molecule is
chiral. Seems like the data were forced to be reduced to a mirror_related
SG. Lijun
On Aug 13, 2014 2:00 AM, "Kristof Van Hecke"
wrote:
> Dear,
>
> I’m struggling with the following (small molecule) problem:
>
> We are tryin
F000 contributes to the whole map as a level (F000/V). If calculated with a
only difference of with or w/o F000, should the sigma levels of the two maps be
the same? That is why we could rely on maps for modeling that are calculated
w/o F000 item. Lijun
On Nov 28, 2012, at 2:30 PM, Pavel
sure.
Changing occupancy of Zn may not be reasonable in this regard even
though it does erase negative peaks.
Lijun Liu@Kansas
On Tue, 2012-08-28 at 12:07 -0700, Deepthi wrote:
> Hi Everybody
>
>
> Thank You very much for your suggestions. I did play around with
> Zinc occupancy by
Hi,
~1/3 of a chain that show substantial difference suggests a
possibility that may deserve a check---the symmetry is actually lower
and the 2 conformations belong to two occ=1 mols (unless the SG is
already P1).
I had a case that the apo SG was P1 and ligand-bound (soaked) SG was
P1 t
Min-Kyu,
This sounds like to be a hydrophobicity ~ temperature issue (as Kevin pointed
out, pH gets involved too).
If your protein is sensitive in this regards, it could form different
oligomerization states at diff temp, associated
with diff solubility. You may want to crystallize it at diff
stassis Perrakis>
>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Anyway, I thought that was a cool idea, but like so many other
cool
>>>> things, it had to be cut from the Nature paper. Admittedly,
the problem
>>>> has
>>>> not actually been solved yet.
http://kolda.webz.cz
Lijun Liu
555 Mission Bay Blvd South
CVRB Room 482, MBox 3122
University of California, San Francisco
San Francisco, CA 94158
Phone: (415)514-2836
d I choose f000 over
f010
or whatever else? Since I have no access to f000 experimentally,
isn't
it strange to define its phase as 0 rather than some other
reflection?
JPK
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 7:27 PM, Lijun Liu
wrote:
When talking about the reflection phase:
While we are on embarrass
There is no point a shift on this value is applied, but
a counter balance for
this shift will have to be applied during the calculation later if a
shift had been applied.
no any merits for this!
Lijun
JPK
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 7:27 PM, Lijun Liu wrote:
When talking about
-240
2240 Campus Drive
Evanston IL 60208
lab: 847.491.2438
cel: 773.608.9185
email: j-kell...@northwestern.edu
***
Lijun Liu
Cardiovascular Research Institute
University of California, San Francisco
1700 4th Street, Box 2532
San Francisco, CA 94158
Phone: (415)514-2836
.
Thanks again for everyone's help.
-- Bill
William G. Scott
Professor
Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry
and The Center for the Molecular Biology of RNA
228 Sinsheimer Laboratories
University of California at Santa Cruz
Santa Cruz, California 95064
USA
phone: +1-831-459-5367 (o
y making
a map with resolution limited to 2.3 A. If that looks ok, extend
the resolution in small steps through the 2.1A range. If you layers
suddenly returns with one of these steps, you could eliminate a thin
shell, or narrow it down to the particular spot and eliminate that.
-ed-
Lijun Liu wrote:
No.
pattern to address this---I used the wrong nomenclature to address the
same thing, I think. Lijun
Could any of those strong spots at 2.1 be ice?
Original message
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 16:13:31 -0700
From: Lijun Liu
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] Residual densities!
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.
l not
modify your original data in any way. Let me if using PHENIX map
calculation tools does not help.
Cheers,
Pavel.
On 7/20/10 3:19 PM, Lijun Liu wrote:
Hi all,
I solved a structure and the refinement is close to complete.
However, some residual density puzzles me.
The SG is P212121
the statistics if this is a normal 2fo-fc map.
>cheers,
>-ed collins
>
>On Jul 18, 2010, at 10:39 PM, 孙庆祥 wrote:
>
>>
>
您想拥有和网易免费邮箱一样强大的软件吗?
Lijun Liu
Cardiovascular Research Institute
University of California, San Francisco
1700 4th Street, Box 2532
San Francisco, CA 94158
Phone: (415)514-2836
Sorry, I think my reply was not case in the attached images! I
happened to have the problem to see the image but I could now see all
of them. I think Tim was correct, the patterns are not the same at
all. Lijun
On Jul 16, 2010, at 12:23 PM, Lijun Liu wrote:
Dear Hui,
About the so
ly appreciated.
Thank you very much in advance for your inputs.
Sincerely,
Hui Yang
Lijun Liu
Cardiovascular Research Institute
University of California, San Francisco
1700 4th Street, Box 2532
San Francisco, CA 94158
Phone: (415)514-2836
epartment of Physics Room 454
1900 E. Kenwood Blvd.
Milwaukee, WI 53211
phone: +1-414-229-4338
email: m-schm...@uwm.edu
http://users.physik.tu-muenchen.de/marius/
Lijun Liu
Cardiovascular Research Institute
University of California, San Francisco
1700 4th Street, Box 2532
San Francisco, CA 94
hmidt
Asst. Professor
University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
Department of Physics Room 454
1900 E. Kenwood Blvd.
Milwaukee, WI 53211
phone: +1-414-229-4338
email: m-schm...@uwm.edu
http://users.physik.tu-muenchen.de/marius/
Lijun Liu
Cardiovascular Research Institute
University of California, San Francisco
1700 4th Street, Box 2532
San Francisco, CA 94158
Phone: (415)514-2836
give very
positive density contribution at
some specific spots in the cell, just because of the phases.
Lijun Liu
Cardiovascular Research Institute
University of California, San Francisco
1700 4th Street, Box 2532
San Francisco, CA 94158
Phone: (415)514-2836
,
Jacob Keller
***
Jacob Pearson Keller
Northwestern University
Medical Scientist Training Program
Dallos Laboratory
F. Searle 1-240
2240 Campus Drive
Evanston IL 60208
lab: 847.491.2438
cel: 773.608.9185
email: j-kell...@northwestern.edu
********
ion (P2 or P212121)?
2) How should we proceed further in case like this?
Thanks in advance for the suggestions.
Bob
Lijun Liu
Cardiovascular Research Institute
University of California, San Francisco
1700 4th Street, Box 2532
San Francisco, CA 94158
Phone: (415)514-2836
de to that for a free electron.
--
Hmmm...where does the 'electron' in electron density then come from
after
integration/summation over the structure factors?
----------
BR
Lij
le go away. Marc and Ian I imagine will tell me
that cycle = 1 and hemi = 1 and therefore we have Angstrom^2 and they
are more than welcome to do that in their papers, but I think it
important here to clarify exactly what "one B factor unit" means.
-James Holton
MAD Scientist
Lijun L
quot; (I mean
you are going to stop) of a smooth refinement, switching test sets
should not be a "huge" problem, or the model is too wrong!
Back to Mike's question: I suggest you keep the same test set, since
your data were from the exactly same crystal. At least it saves y
ething else for binning, especially in the early time for
refinement package development. RESOLUTION BINNING might not be a
have-to? :D
Best regards.
Lijun Liu, PhD
http://www.uoregon.edu/~liulj/
sults from CNS
and Molrep differs so much.
4. Any other suggestions on the molecular replacement are appraciated.
Thanks.
Wei Zhang
PKU
Lijun Liu, PhD
Institute of Molecular Biology
Department of Physics
University of Oregon
Eugene, OR 97403
541-346-5176
http://www.uoregon.edu/~liulj/
y Facility Manager
Department of Structural Biology
3501 Fifth Avenue,
Pittsburgh, PA 15260
412-383-5839
lab...@pitt.edu
Lijun Liu, PhD
Institute of Molecular Biology
Department of Physics
University of Oregon
Eugene, OR 97403
541-346-5176
http://www.uoregon.edu/~liulj/
Hi Matt,
AKTA system does allow you check the how-good percentage of the UV lamp,
so if the UV lamp is new, and it gives low percentage (I do not mean the
20%) then your AKTA system may have the problem like Scott said or other
thing in the Optical path.
There are other possibilities, however! F
Now that there is possibility that images could be fake, which means the
first and automatic FFT in crystallography could be falsified. All those
depositions later than this would be just nothing but wrong, if images
were fake. To keep the first and most important FFT not contaminated, I
would su
ght angle, derived from your P21 cell constants (a, c and beta
angle) (if they were well determined), implying this may not be the case.
Good luck!
Lijun Liu, PhD
Institute of Molecular Biology
HHMI & Department of Physics
University of Oregon
Eugene, OR 97403
541-346-5176
http://www.uoregon.edu
Astex
Therapeutics Ltd only send and receive e-mails on the basis that the
Company is not liable for any such alteration or any consequences
thereof.
Astex Therapeutics Ltd., Registered in England at 436 Cambridge
Science Park, Cambridge CB4 0QA under number 3751674
Lijun Liu, PhD
81.1% 1% 0.7072144
total 131556 16015 16144 99.2% 5.4%
5.6% 131514 26.34 5.7%10.6% 0% 0.758 13597
Attached figures:
Data scaled in P2, self-rotation function in MOLREP
Data scaled in P222, self-rotation function in MOLREP
Cumulative inte
Island, WA, USA
work: JAbendroth_at_decode.com
home: Jan.Abendroth_at_gmail.com
Lijun Liu, PhD
Institute of Molecular Biology
HHMI & Department of Physics
University of Oregon
Eugene, OR 97403
541-346-5176
rster, Research Associate
Paul Freemont & Xiaodong Zhang Labs
Department of Biochemistry, Imperial College London
Lijun Liu, PhD
Institute of Molecular Biology
HHMI & Department of Physics
University of Oregon
Eugene, OR 97403
541-346-5176
Hello,
Thank you all for replying to the question about
the old-fashioned drawing of electron density map.
It should be able to work with one or combination of
1) Gerard's USF scripts
2) Chain
3) CCP4's
Thanks also to other alternate suggestions.
Lijun Liu, PhD
Institute of Molecul
from
writing
and debugging codes. Thanks a lot!
Lijun Liu, PhD
Institute of Molecular Biology
HHMI & Department of Physics
University of Oregon
Eugene, OR 97403
541-346-4080
sometimes
the overall
scaling struggles to get a reasonable fit..
Lijun Liu, PhD
Institute of Molecular Biology
HHMI & Department of Physics
University of Oregon
Eugene, OR 97403
541-346-4080
Hamburg c/o DESY, Notkestraße 85,
22603 Hamburg, Germany
-
This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/
Lijun Liu, PhD
Institute of Molecular Biology
HHMI & Department of Physics
University of Oregon
Eugene, OR 97403
541-346-4080
899-909, but it is a detailed simulation rather
than a single formula.
Richard Gillilan
MacCHESS
Lijun Liu, PhD
Institute of Molecular Biology
HHMI & Department of Physics
University of Oregon
Eugene, OR 97403
541-346-4080
the message is received by anyone other than the
addressee, please return the message to the sender by replying to
it and then delete the message from your computer and network.
Lijun Liu, PhD
Institute of Molecular Biology
HHMI & Department of Physics
University of Oregon
Eugene, OR 97403
The convention for "P22121"s is P21212, which is used by both CNS and CCP4
and many else, if not all. The unit cell needs to be reindexed (a-b-c -->
b-c-a in your case). Then please try again. Lijun
> Thank you for your suggestions.
> 1. The unit cell of my crystal is 47.41 99.67 114.97 90 90
int out if I am wrong.
This "assignment" of free radicals to damage is often made
(flippantly) in the literature, but I feel a strong need to point
out that there is NO EVIDENCE of a free radical diffusion mechanism
for radiation damage below ~130K.
Lijun Liu, PhD
Institute
0 M? Thanks a lot.
Lijun Liu, PhD
Institute of Molecular Biology
HHMI & Department of Physics
University of Oregon
Eugene, OR 97403
541-346-4080
you
received this
information in error, please contact the Compliance HelpLine at
800-856-1983 and
properly dispose of this information.
Lijun Liu, PhD
Institute of Molecular Biology
HHMI & Department of Physics
University of Oregon
Eugene, OR 97403
541-346-4080
20.088
178 0.273 0.3700.683 81567.80.010
1.3710.088
179 0.273 0.3710.682 81568.00.010
1.3740.088
180 0.273 0.3700.683 81565.70.010
1.3720.088
Lijun Liu, PhD
Institute of Molecular Bi
If the number ~75% was ALWAYS true for all datasets, while not a SG error,
not cracks/twinning, not a mosaicity problem and not here and there, then
I would BET the REAL oscillation angle for each img for all datasets
should be 4 times as what what input while the steps stayed correct. (For
instanc
, the density is much worse than the first one. Are there
any ways to improve the density of the second molecule, such as
some kinds of averaging? Why that happens?
Thank you very much for your help!
Sincerely,
Sun Tang
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your homepage.
Lijun
in advance
Brenda
Lijun Liu, PhD
Institute of Molecular Biology
HHMI & Department of Physics
University of Oregon
Eugene, OR 97403
541-346-4080
60 matches
Mail list logo