Hi:
I'd use Mtz2various to convert .mtz file to .phs format. The format
of .phs file is like below:
0 0 9 29.5 0.14 220.00.00.00.00.0
0 0 12 160.5 0.97 109.0 -4.52.4 -0.91.2
0 0 15 72.6 0.87 56.0 36.5 10.5 -12.6 -7.9
0 0 1
Hi Sam,
Ideally, with the R factor you are at, you should be able to build these
residues in, using Coot/Ono/xtalview and then refine with shelxl.
If you want to go to shelxl straightaway, you might want to refine res
9-86 as one chain and res 94-last residues as another.
I guess you could mutate a
Hi
I would appreciate few things for my protein structure. Data is 1.5A.
This protein is of 400 residues. 2 molecule in the asymm unit.
Missing residues are : N-terminal 8 residues, C-terminal 5 residues and in
the middle residues 87-93.
Final R(working) = 21% after refmac refinement. Some (not a
Does anyone have a synopsis of the recent (last few months?)
discussion about stereo glasses? I've been using cross-eyed stereo,
but my mom says that my eyes will stick that way...
Thanks,
Pat
---
Patric
Hi there,
Could you please either take me off thelistof CCP4BB or instruct me how to do
it myself?
Thanks, Iris
Iris Ben-Efraim, PhD
Department of Biological Sciences
Purdue University
West Lafayette, IN 47906
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: 765-4946465
Fax: 765-4961189
I'd also comment that the absolute values are quite large. Well, I have no
knowledge what groups you've chosen, but for domain-sized groups, typical
values are 1-10 deg**2. Values can be larger for smaller TLS groups. This is
just a rule-of-thumb, but would make me suspicious whether the TLS refine
I found this question interesting, therefore I quickly searched the entire PDB
V3 (http://wwpdb-remediation.rutgers.edu/) for LINK records linking two
standard amino acid residues, excluding chain links and same-chain disulfides.
Here are the results:
http://cci.lbl.gov/~rwgk/tmp/protein_protei
Hi,
I just installed the newest version of ccp4i in windows. However, I can not
find the program"surface" mentioned by some references around 2000-2002. Does
this program no longer exist or renamed to something else?
Thanks a lot.
On Monday 26 February 2007 08:23, Richard Gillilan wrote:
> Ok, Painter and Merritt describe this situation in their Acta Cryst
> (2006) D62 439-450 article entitled "Optimal description of a protein
> structure in terms of multiple groups undergoing TLS motion." At
> least with regard to fit
Thanks to everyone for the suggestions. It appears that just adding a
bfactor and occupancy flag is the way to go (eg - there's no way to make
lsqkab less finicky). Since I'm just hacking this together and
grep/sedding out the pairwise rmsds to pipe to another program, I'd
prefer to use the eas
This is a general question concerning the application of NCS in the
context of an electron microscopy density map.
I would like to refine a crystallographically determined protein
structure into an EM map of a biological structure with helical
symmetry while retaining the interactions that
Jacob, lsqman from USF will be happy without B and Q, and you can pick
the set of atoms that you want to align. I think that you can run it in
script mode, as well.
Kevin
Jacob Corn wrote:
Dear everyone,
I'm attempting to do a large scripted pairwise alignment of theoretical
models to calcu
Hi Lionel
Definitely an engineered example for you: This is a paper describing (among
other things) the 3D structure of a ligand-induced homodimer of E. coli DHFR (a
functional monomer), via covalent linkage of the ligands themselves.
Designing Protein Dimerizers: The Importance of Ligand Confo
Dear everyone,
I'm attempting to do a large scripted pairwise alignment of theoretical models to calculate rmsd over a pre-determined
residue range, but the PDBs that I'm using have neither B-factor nor occupancy fields. Lsqkab is unhappy about this fact
(see below), and I'm wondering if there's
Ok, Painter and Merritt describe this situation in their Acta Cryst
(2006) D62 439-450 article entitled "Optimal description of a protein
structure in terms of multiple groups undergoing TLS motion." At
least with regard to fitting L parameters from previously refined
data, negative eigenva
Dear all,
I would be very interested and much grateful having references
(bibliographic data, PDB entry code, web link...) on 3D structures of
covalently linked (engineered or not) protein-protein complexes (e.g.
heterodimers). Our own survey of the literature was not very
"successful".
Thank
Hi all,
Thanks to those who replied to my question. I thought others
might be interested, so I'm giving the summary below.
I think, we'll go for the Superdex, as we have more experience with it.
1) If the prices are similar then toyopearl may be a better choice as it has
slightly bette
BS"D
Hello All,
One can find in many organic chemistry textbooks statements about
how SN2 reactions on carbon atoms in cyclohexyl rings are not
favoured because of hindrance from the axial substituents (even
hydrogen). Unfortunately, I'm having trouble (say via google)
finding some re
Hey all,
this is wildly off-topic, but since we were even talking about NMR the other
day, I was thinking why not EM?
I'm trying to get negative stain images of a membrane protein. Problem is
that the detergent (similar to triton) that best stabilizes the protein eats
the carbon grid, even at c
NEW STRUCTURE BASED DRUG DISCOVERY COURSE - May & September 2007
A new course is being run at York to provide an introduction to the
methods of structure-based drug discovery. Preliminary funding to start
the course has been provided by the Modular Training for Industry
initiative of the BBSRC wi
This is really a Q to Kevin Cowtan..
Is it important to have a "proper" mask for DMMULTI? I had always
thought it was self correcting and as long as it was
big enough then the program would update it?
Eleanor
Peter Adrian Meyer wrote:
I would be very much afraid that the only way to get the
Martin Hallberg wrote:
I recently received a referee report that stated "The authors should
describe the number of residues in the fully allowed, favored. The
present statistic is misleading. Molprobity is far too loose (it even
gives good values for structures that are wrong!) Procheck is m
22 matches
Mail list logo