ermission = ##f
}
}
\score{{\repeat unfold 105 {c'1 \break }}}
\pageBreak
\score{{ \repeat unfold 7 {c'1 \break }}}
\score{{ \repeat unfold 7 {c'1 \break }}}
\score{{ \repeat unfold 7 {c'1 \break }}}
Eluze
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.
Am 25.02.2014 00:41, schrieb karol:
Come on, Eluze you have to see it
<http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/file/n159817/clef2.png>
to be honest - I've never looked exactly at clefs exactly and seeing
your report I also had the feeling something is wrong.
but I wasn'
karol wrote
> Nope. I have offical windows binary installed.
but with the /offical windows binary/ and your code I get more stuff, eg.
the time signature - can you provide the full code for what you get and also
explain what in this key is so horrible?!
thanks!
Eluze
--
View this message
didn't check that!
Eluze
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/search-LSR-for-fingering-precisely-shows-wrong-title-description-tp159692p159709.html
Sent from the Bugs mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
bug
Schneidy wrote
> 2014-02-22 0:56 GMT+01:00 Eluze <
> eluzew@
> >:
>
>>
>> I think LilyPond is doing better now by default - and tweaking with
>> extra-offset seems a horror to me.
>>
>> delete this snippet?!
>>
>>
>
> Yep, I had
<http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/file/n159692/fingeringprecisely.png>
however it links to the correct snippet!
Eluze
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/search-LSR-for-fingering-precisely-shows-wrong-title-description-tp159692.html
Sent from th
- and tweaking with
extra-offset seems a horror to me.
delete this snippet?!
Eluze
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/LSR-v2-18-Positioning-fingering-indications-precisely-fingernings-crashes-in-the-doc-tp159511p159647.html
Sent from the Bugs mailing
David Kastrup wrote
> Eluze <
> eluzew@
> > writes:
>
>> my hiliter doesn't support hiliting keywords in quotes (or I don't know
>> how
>> to specify it)
>>
>> what's the risk of using the unquoted form:
>>
>> \remo
my hiliter doesn't support hiliting keywords in quotes (or I don't know how
to specify it)
what's the risk of using the unquoted form:
\remove Bar_engraver
instead of
\remove "Bar_engraver"
Eluze
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.
\type "Performer_group"
>
> The erroneous capital G leads to a fatal error in .ly files that include
> both a NullVoice and a \midi block.
thank you for the report - I've added
https://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3872&thanks=3872&ts=1392888088
Janek Warchoł wrote
> 2014-02-16 23:58 GMT+01:00 Eluze <
> eluzew@
> >:
>> \version "2.18.0"
>> % this doesn't work since 2.19.2
>> <<
>> \new Voice=A \relative c'{ c d e f g a }
>> \new Lyrics \lyricsto A \lyricmode {
automatically, so the \lyricmode
keyword may be omitted."
and indeed, omitting \lyricmode works and also putting braces after
/\lyricsto A/ works - but I don't think this is an improvement in
user-friendliness...
Eluze
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble
Thomas Morley-2 wrote
> %% begin example
>
> \version "2.19.1"
>
> \header { title = \markup \vspace #10 }
>
> \markup "xy"
>
> %% end example
thank you for your report which is now in the tracker
https://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/
thanks for your report - added
https://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3854&thanks=3854&ts=1391989634
Eluze
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/small-discrepancy-in-doc-windows-2-18-tp158923p159063.html
Sent from the Bugs mailing list ar
https://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3834&thanks=3834&ts=1391444635
has been added - thanks for your report
Eluze
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/NullVoice-modern-voice-cautionary-spurious-cancellation-tp158765p158792.html
Sent
e octave. Otherwise the NullVoice may interact with the printed
voices in unexpected ways. For example, arbitrary notes in the NullVoice may
cause accidentals to appear (or disappear) on the staff."
check where your accidentalStyle should go!
Eluze
--
View this message in context:
Federico Bruni-5 wrote
> 2014/2/2 Eluze <
> eluzew@
> >
>
>> Federico Bruni-5 wrote
>> > 2014/2/2 Eluze <
>>
>> > eluzew@
>>
>> > >
>> >
>> >> (I don't know what @cindex means)
>> >
>&
Federico Bruni-5 wrote
> 2014/2/2 Eluze <
> eluzew@
> >
>
>> (I don't know what @cindex means)
>
> they are currently indexed only with @funindex, as you can see with:
>
> cd Documentation
> git grep 'index \\book'
this documentation does
Federico Bruni-5 wrote
> 2014/2/1 Trevor Daniels <
> t.daniels@.co
> >
>
>>
>> James wrote Saturday, February 01, 2014 10:51 AM
>>
>>
>> > On 01/02/14 10:14, Eluze wrote:
>>
>> >> add \single, \temporary \undo and more to t
pkx166h wrote
> On 01/02/14 09:44, Eluze wrote:
>> in NR 2.19.1 Appendix D + E, a lot of commands are listed /with/ and
>> /without/ the backslash - this seems unnecessary
>>
>> some commands - eg. \single, \temporary and \undo - are only listed
>> /without/ ba
recognizable as commands.
counter-opinions?
Eluze
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/redundant-entries-in-the-indexes-are-confusing-and-lessening-the-clarity-tp158696.html
Sent from the Bugs mailing list archive at Nabble.com
David Kastrup wrote
> Henning Hraban Ramm <
> lilypondml@
> > writes:
>
>> Am 2014-01-27 um 16:43 schrieb Eluze <
> eluzew@
> >:
>>
>>> David Kastrup wrote
>>>> Uh, this is awkward, but you do know that the LilyPond distribution
&
pkx166h wrote
> On 20/01/14 16:04, Eluze wrote:
>> inspired by this post
>> http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Large-gap-in-text-td158151.html#a158232
>> I minimized this code, where the first list needs more than a page.
>
> Does adding \paper { annotate-spacing =
\vspace #5 hello
\vspace #5 hello
\vspace #5 hello
\vspace #5 hello
\vspace #5 hello
\vspace #5 hello
}
this behavior can be corrected by putting only 1 \markuplist in a \bookpart
- which of course limits the use of \markuplist.
expectable/bug?
Eluze
--
View this message in cont
ty = #(modulo-bar-number-visible 2 1) % or 2 0 to see
the even bar numbers
}
}
Eluze
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Bar-number-on-odd-bars-does-not-work-on-new-release-tp157263p158181.html
Sent from the Bug
David Kastrup wrote
> Eluze <
> eluzew@
> > writes:
>
>> David Kastrup wrote
>>> A={c d e}
>>> \addlyrics { this is bad }
>>>
>>> would be legitimate, so the assignment is not complete without looking
>>> at the next token
on.html#ghost-notes
> This
> is not true, you do not have to include anything. Also, you do not have to
> add chord brackets.
> Maybe this could be updated?
seems to come from times when tweaks like \parenthesize only worked in
chords...
now the Parenthesis_engraver is included in
is
bad } to be assigned to A?
Eluze
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/error-unknown-escaped-string-after-defining-a-variable-tp157873p157958.html
Sent from the Bugs mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
bug-lilypo
{c d e}
A={c d e}
\A
is this a bug, remediable?
Eluze
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/error-unknown-escaped-string-after-defining-a-variable-tp157873.html
Sent from the Bugs mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
bug
<http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/file/n157608/repeatBarAtbeginningNew.png>
should we discuss if an empty bar should be inserted automatically?
Eluze
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/NR-1-4-1-printing-a-repeat-sign-at-the-beginning-
was a little confused when I wrote this
now this snippet is part of the documentation where - as you say - it should
be removed.
but what about the LSR snippet? should we add how to make a common or dashed
bar line to show in the first measure (or delete the snippet as well)?
Eluze
--
View t
".|:"
> c1
> d1
> d4 e f g
> }
>
> Should it be removed from the documentation?
I think in real music most often the first (opening) repeat bar is omitted
in the 1st measure.
other opinions?
Eluze
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.106903
Rutger Hofman-2 wrote
> v2.19.0 has a new bug compared to v2.17 and v2.18 in the following
> snippet, from the \time change in the second \alternative:
thank you for reporting this - I added
https://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3792&thanks=3792&ts=1389138927
Eluze
Phil Holmes-2 wrote
> "Eluze" <
> eluzew@
> > wrote in message
> news:
> 1389112965862-157358.post@.nabble
> ...
>> what exactly is this option - -dpixmap-format=pngalpha - supposed to do
>> and
>> how should the output be different?
what exactly is this option - -dpixmap-format=pngalpha - supposed to do and
how should the output be different? (I've never used that)
Eluze
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/transparency-and-resolution-don-t-go-together-tp157283p157358.html
Sent fro
hi squadders
I've done 40-50 so far, but getting tired now - hope someone can continue
tomorrow.
good night!
Eluze
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/verifying-issues-Fixed-2-19-0-tp157269.html
Sent from the Bugs mailing list archive at Nabbl
) in both cases.
"
and this does *not* mean that a path can be added.
maybe be it would be better to write
--output=filename
in the doc.
Eluze
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/lilypond-command-line-tp157097p157116.html
Sent from
code (lyric-combine-music-iterator I think) that would seem to be
> intended to kill the music when the lyrics stop.
I *hope* this is not intended!
one can use set associatedVoice in the \with section or before entering
\lyricmode.
added
https://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3733&am
; This may be a bug. Copying to the bug list.
>
> Removing \lyricsto restores the missing notes, so as a work-around,
> given you have just one bar, remove \lyricsto and enter the duration
> of each syllable explicitly.
TaoCG gave an answer in
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Missing-not
level is
overridden by the setting in a lower level where there is no staff following
(in the same context).
is this correct/intended?
are there workarounds?
should I open two issues for this?
Eluze
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/vertical-distance
Keith OHara wrote
> Eluze
>
> gmail.com> writes:
>>
>> the staff named "last" is engraved /above/ the StaffGroup
>
> because the StaffGroup is not accepted by a GrandStaff,
> so is pushed out the bottom, while the Staff is accepted
> in the S
is wrapped in a staff group it works as expected:
\new GrandStaff <<
\new StaffGroup <<
\new Staff { c'1 }
\new Staff { d'1 }
>>
\new StaffGroup <<
\new Staff { \set Staff.instrumentName = last f'1 }
>>
>>
is this a bug? can it
David Kastrup wrote
> "Phil Holmes" <
> mail@
> > writes:
>
>> "Eluze" <
> eluzew@
> > wrote in message
>> news:
> 1386257667809-155106.post@.nabble
> ...
>>> Phil Holmes-2 wrote
>>>> Not sure you can
I don't have time to find out
> why right now.
it works if I omit the \markup and place a few leading spaces instead - here
is the new file LSR503.ly
<http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/file/n155114/LSR503.ly>
Eluze
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038
Phil Holmes-2 wrote
> Not sure you can update the snippet, but please do try and let me know on
> the list that it needs approving.
you're right - I can't
here is the modified code: LSR503.ly
<http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/file/n155106/LSR503.ly>
Eluze
-
tions where
/extra-offset/ does a better job than /Y-offset/
if you like I can update the LSR-snippet and you will have to approve it -
please tell me.
Eluze
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/vertical-centering-of-chorus-lyrics-and-not-needed-code-in-snip
, taking into account the
number of stanzas, the \verticalAxisGroup values and maybe some more...
Eluze
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/vertical-centering-of-chorus-lyrics-and-not-needed-code-in-snippets-tp154979.html
Sent from the Bugs
;re at these relative includes - I think \verbatim-files also
doesn't allow it.
I'll file a bug-report/enhancement request (probably tomorrow)
Eluze
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/epsfile-relative-file-locations-tp154592p154768.html
Sent from
dr (command-line))) "/" filename))
>
> ... \epsfile #X #50 #(relative "file.eps") ...
thanks for this workaround - it works as expected.
I think LilyPond should do this by default and if not the function shouldn't
be named /relative/ (I get problems in my environm
David Kastrup wrote
> So at the current point of time, our bug squad seems incomplete. I'm
> pretty sure that Eluze is taking at least Monday duty.
>
> But it definitely looks like reports on Thursday and Friday are either
> getting lost or swept up by Colin or others.
yes
http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.17/Documentation/notation/paper-size-and-automatic-scaling
this doesn't seem correct:
"it must come before the any \paper block"
right before there is
"Setting the paper size ‘A4’ is the default value when no explicit paper
size is set. However, there are two func
Steven Weber wrote
> [...]
> which works great for everything except the multi-measure case. Your
> brilliant override below fixes the multi-measure case as well. Thanks!
better praise the developers who provide functions for even such rare cases!
Eluze
--
View this message i
Steven Weber wrote
you can add
\override MultiMeasureRest.#'spacing-pair = #'(staff-bar . staff-bar)
to have the mmrest ignore the space taken by the TimeSignature
Eluze
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Multi-measure-rests-before-a-new-tempo
ood way to say "skip the next 500 measures, regardless of their
> length."
what's your code so far (to eliminate time, key or clef indications)?
Eluze
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Multi-measure-rests-before-a-new-temporary-staff-is-added-t
|
\break
\repeat unfold 5 { c4 d e f | }
}
\new Staff {
\clef bass
\time 4/4
\colorContext blue
\key f \major
s1 *10 \repeat unfold 5 { c,4 d, e, f, | }
}
>>
}
Eluze
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabb
wn to this much tinier example - I've added
https://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3642&thanks=3642&ts=1383301017
to the tracker.
Eluze
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/vertical-spacing-of-a-staff-wi
k-ohara5a5a wrote
>
> Eluze wrote
>>> staff=\new Staff = staff \new Voice = voice { a'1 a'1 }
>>> lyric=\context Lyrics = lyric \lyricsto voice { oh oh }
>>>
>>> A =<< \staff \lyric >>
>>>
>>> B=<< \st
Eluze wrote
> the score after \A always has different vertical spacing: the distance
> from the markup line increases and/or the distance between the staff and
> the lyrics changes.
>
> is there an explanation for this?
while I managed to reduce the distance between the staff a
tance between the staff and the
lyrics changes.
is there an explanation for this?
(the 2nd irritation is that I have to write A =<< with a blank before the
equal sign and this isn't needed for B and C)
Eluze
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/vertica
David Kastrup wrote
> Eluze <
> eluzew@
> > writes:
>
>> David Kastrup wrote
>
> And then I would be afraid that it would do something besides cleaning
> up the backups, some conversion or so. When using rm *.ly.~* I know
> exactly what will happen.
and
David Kastrup wrote
> Eluze <
> eluzew@
> > writes:
>
>> carried away by my success in contributing a little patch for convert-ly
>> in
>> Python and inspired by dak's sentence "numbered backups tend to
>> accumulate"
>> (sorry
sorry, forgot the new file: convert-ly.py
<http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/file/n152872/convert-ly.py>
Eluze
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/clean-numbered-backups-with-convert-ly-tp152870p152872.html
Sent from the Bugs mailing list arch
- I
don't think I've seen this is mentioned in the AU but it is much easier to
write!
so I suggest to add a short note like:
boolean parameters like e, c, d, b … can be collected after a single "-",
eg. -bec
in the end of the chapter *2.3 Command line options for convert-ly*
Am 17.10.2013 21:28, schrieb Marek Klein:
2013/10/17 Eluze
Marek Klein wrote
Could you please include original poster in your answers?
do you mean additionally to the list?
I can try, but might forget sometimes.
and I think he's reading the list!?
He doesn't have to. Why do yo
Marek Klein wrote
> Could you please include original poster in your answers?
do you mean additionally to the list?
I can try, but might forget sometimes.
and I think he's reading the list!?
Eluze
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/No-progress-mes
would be in the log file.
I can't reproduce this with the newest Frescobaldi - all the messages are
displayed in a window called LilyPond.log.
Eluze
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/No-progress-messages-on-GUI-under-Windows-7-tp152280p152482.html
S
hi Karol
anyway - I've entered a new issue in the tracker - thanks for your report!
Eluze
https://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3612&thanks=3612&ts=1381827371
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/partcombine-bug-missplaced-rest-tp
Karol Majewski-2 wrote
> Missplaced rest when notes are tied.
please reduce your example to a tiny size - eg. 4/4 = 1 … !
Eluze
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/partcombine-bug-missplaced-rest-tp152312p152319.html
Sent from the Bugs mailing list arch
interfaces will show the messages when
> using
> an older major version of Lilypond. What has changed (not explained in
> Lilypond documentation)?
what exactly used to be displayed (and is not displayed in newer versions)
when you run Lilypond from the command line. which versions were
th and in this case it leads to this unlucky
break.
you can correct it with a more appropriate value, eg.
\set Score.proportionalNotationDuration = #(ly:make-moment 1 12)
Eluze
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/strange-automatic-line-breaking-after-full-m
Am 08.10.2013 11:24, schrieb David Kastrup:
Eluze writes:
nostalgically, I keep track of LilyPond files' history by inserting a
commented version number.
this is updated too - bug or intention (or just nitpicks)?
Note that (Texinfo style) outcommented version numbers are also us
nostalgically, I keep track of LilyPond files' history by inserting a
commented version number.
this is updated too - bug or intention (or just nitpicks)?
Eluze
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/convert-ly-updates-commented-version-numbers-tp151980
it also avoids confusions resulting from adding a
digit to the original file name (I often use names like example-1.ly
example-2.ly)
Eluze
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/backup-files-from-convert-ly-are-overriden-tp151177p151200.html
Sent
nts are
myFile.ly~.1 or myFile.ly.1~
this also seems easier to search such files with regex to delete them when
all adaptations are done.
Eluze
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/backup-files-from-convert-ly-are-overriden-tp151177p151198.html
Sent from th
precisely at
> that bar, but exists anyway even without a line break.
@1: the newer versions - 2.17.21 (?) and higher - provide a way to write a
double bar at the end of a line and the start repeat grob on the following
line:
\set Score.startRepeatType = #".|:-||"
hth
Eluze
increasing number to the backup file.
this way you can check if a file already exists, if yes-> increase the
number, if no -> backup using this last number.
running convert-ly more than once on the same file would then result in
myFile.~ly.1
myFile.~ly.2
myFile.~ly.3
…
thanks!
Eluze
--
Vie
hi Simon
I just added
https://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3570&thanks=3570&ts=1379779332
to the bug tracker
Eluze
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Misplaced-clef-at-invisible-barline-tp151006p151141.html
Sent from the Bugs mail
ms to work better.
>>
>>
> No, it doesn’t: \bar "|" takes horizontal space, while \bar "" does not.
>
> Simon
your goal was to enable a \break…
you can refine the above sketches by overrides of the BarLine's x-extent or
other tweaks
Eluze
--
View this
verride Score.BarLine.transparent=##t
\bar "|"
or:
\once \override Score.SpanBar.stencil=#point-stencil
\once \override Score.BarLine.stencil=#point-stencil
\bar "|"
seems to work better.
Eluze
--
View this messag
new file is to keep a copy of the
original file.
convert-ly creates such a backup - maybe it's not nice that previous backups
are overridden each time convert-ly runs.
should the documentation in AU be readapted?! (omit redirection tips or warn
there might be issues with it)
Eluze
--
oblem, or your version of Python and Windows just don't cooperate
> sensibly on sys.stdout.
after looking up Martin Tarenskeen's indent-ly.py I replaced
# sys.stderr.flush ()
by
outfile.close()
and it works!
does that make sense?!
Eluze
--
View this message in
thout option -e (the output should then just be on-screen)?
indeed, it is!
Eluze
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/convert-ly-from-the-commandline-under-windows-corrupted-tp149284p149307.html
Sent from the Bugs
Phil Holmes-2 wrote
> "
> I presume convert-ly runs OK without the > redirect? Does dir > dir.txt
> work OK?
yes, with the option -e, and also dir > dir.txt
Eluze
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/convert-ly-from-the-commandline-
[GCC 4.1.1] on mingw32
Eluze
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/convert-ly-from-the-commandline-under-windows-corrupted-tp149284p149299.html
Sent from the Bugs mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
bug-lilypond ma
Phil Holmes-2 wrote
> "Eluze" <
> eluzew@
> > wrote in message
> news:
> 1376651267219-149284.post@.nabble
> ...
>> following the instructions in AU:
>>
>> "Alternatively, if you want to specify a different name for the upgraded
>
it works - so maybe I'll have to execute such programs
under ps (but I've no idea how this works)?!
thanks for the hints!
Eluze
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/convert-ly-from-the-commandline-under-windows-corrupted-tp149284p149292.ht
dak wrote
> Eluze <
> eluzew@
> > writes:
>
>> convert-ly myfile.ly > mynewfile.ly
>> "
> I don't know anything about the Windows command line. What happens if
> you remove the space between > and mynewfile.ly ?
I tried all variations - sa
nvert-ly.py: error: : Unable to open file
convert-ly.py: error: : Unable to open file
convert-ly.py: error: : Unable to open file
anything known about that?
Eluze
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/convert-ly-from-the-commandline-under-windows-corrupted-tp149284.
in NR 2.17.23, Multiple notes to one syllable
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.17/Documentation/notation-big-page#multiple-notes-to-one-syllable
2nd paragraph:
"When a melisma occurs on a syllable other that the last one in a word…"
"that" should be replaced by "than"
David Kastrup wrote
> Instead you should either strip the beam events with a music function, or
> remove the engravers.
removing the engravers does it - thanks!
Eluze
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/error-with-make-music-Music-tp148668p148714.htm
and in the affected context I removed the corresponding engraver - which
works perfectly but eliminates the possibility to use laisser vibrer.
what's the correct way to associate empty music - I guess that's what's
needed here - to these variables?
thanks for any improvements on the
>
}
there are errors (under Windows 7):
programming error: Not a music type
continuing, cross fingers
with version 2.17.23 there is even a crash.
is something wrong with the function or is it a bug in windows?
Eluze
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.co
David Kastrup wrote
> Eluze <
> eluzew@
> > writes:
>
>> why do we have to specify a list for the
>> VerticalAxisGroup.staff-staff-spacing while e.g. for the
>> StaffGrouper.staff-staff-spacing you can define single items and also all
>> the other
etc. accept
single values?
Eluze
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/inconsistent-treatment-of-vertical-spacing-variables-tp148551.html
Sent from the Bugs mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
bug-lilypond mailing
Trevor Daniels wrote
> Eluze wrote Monday, July 29, 2013 12:42 PM
>
>> Trevor Daniels wrote
>
>>> The order in which grobs _in the same layer_ are placed is
>>> indeterminate,
>>> but this can be controlled by setting the 'layer property.
\Staff
\override TextScript.whiteout = ##t
\override TextScript.layer = #0
}
}
the odd thing is you have to find a fitting integer.
in our case only the value #0 is satisfying.
#1 leads to the cropping behavior
#-1 has the bar line drawn through the text
Eluze
--
View this
oiceOne a1)}\new Voice {\voiceTwo c1}>>
> }
>
> the first slur is not connected
I don't see what you're trying to do - can you draw an outline or scan an
example!?
here is a small example how I would write a 2-voice staff:
\new Staff <<
\new Voice {
\voiceOne
a
w.png
<http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/file/n148497/test4.preview.png>
but strangely if I change the code of the 1st staff to
\new Staff \relative c' {
s4 s s 4 _"wh"
q8 q4 q8 q2
}
the flags and stems are cropped wit 2.17.18 too! test4-
with the code - admittedly wrong because of the 6 16's -
\tuplet 5/4 4 { c16 c c c c c}
LP exits without any message in the log
I couldn't find a corresponding entry in the tracker.
Eluze
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/LP-exits-sil
stretchability . 1)
)
}
}
additionally you can also change the markup-system spacing:
\paper {
markup-system-spacing = #'(
(basic-distance . 0)
(minimum-distance . 0)
(padding . .5)
(stretchability . 1)
)
}
hth
Eluze
--
View this message in context:
http://lil
1 - 100 of 505 matches
Mail list logo
