Federico Bruni-5 wrote > 2014/2/1 Trevor Daniels < > t.daniels@.co
> > > >> >> James wrote Saturday, February 01, 2014 10:51 AM >> >> >> > On 01/02/14 10:14, Eluze wrote: >> >> >> add \single, \temporary \undo and more to the index - is that worth >> an >> >> entry in the tracker!? >> >> > A tracker? I'd just create a patch and submit it (and create the >> tracker >> > with git-cl for that patch). Otherwise you are going to have to say >> > where you want the @cindex's specifically. Seems as you know how to >> make >> > a patch that you might as well do them and submit them yourself. I >> don't >> > think it is ever a bad idea to have index entries. >> >> I agree. >> > > Whoever takes this task, please consider also @cindex \bookpart: why - they both (\book and \bookpart) *are* in both indexes, aren't they?! (I don't know what @cindex means) Eluze -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/redundant-entries-in-the-indexes-are-confusing-and-lessening-the-clarity-tp158696p158731.html Sent from the Bugs mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
