David Kastrup wrote > Eluze < > eluzew@
> > writes: > >> my hiliter doesn't support hiliting keywords in quotes (or I don't know >> how >> to specify it) >> >> what's the risk of using the unquoted form: >> >> \remove Bar_engraver >> >> instead of >> >> \remove "Bar_engraver" > > The CG > <URL:http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/contributor/lilypond-formatting> > states: > > All engravers should have double-quotes around them: > > \consists "Spans_arpeggio_engraver" > > LilyPond does not strictly require this, but it is a useful > convention to follow. > > Apart from the bad engraver name here (it's Span_arpeggio_engraver), > this advice is rather old. Should that make a difference? No idea. so nothing withstands using the unquoted form - and the (missing) hiliting would instantly reveal the bad engraver name. thanks for these clarifying quotes! Eluze -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/why-are-all-engravers-quoted-tp159602p159618.html Sent from the Bugs mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
