David Kastrup wrote > This is totally confused. It defines bracketOpenSymbol as a vector > consisting of the symbol make-music and the list (quote Music). But it > puts these definitions in a list where they don't make sense. This is a > totally confused mixture of Scheme and LilyPond code. Not using #(...) > inside of Scheme instead of the probably desired (...) would already > help, but the rest looks pretty much equally awkward. I am surprised > that it is supposed to do anything, actually.
the aim of this French user is to render the same music once with manual beaming only and once with auto-beaming or without any beaming. I proposed to redefine the 2 square brackets to another function (inspired by the example pipeSymbol in NR). not knowing how to define empty music I gave the example bracketOpenSymbol = #(make-music 'LaissezVibrerEvent) and in the affected context I removed the corresponding engraver - which works perfectly but eliminates the possibility to use laisser vibrer. what's the correct way to associate empty music - I guess that's what's needed here - to these variables? thanks for any improvements on the code or new approaches Eluze -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/error-with-make-music-Music-tp148668p148693.html Sent from the Bugs mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
