Re: Multiple \< \> \! under one note not working

Rutger Hofman cs.vu.nl> writes: > The bug is that the > is not terminated, it flows until the end or some > other [text]. > As a workaround you could place a hidden note at the end of the hairpin << e2. { s4\< s4\> \once\hideNotes e4\!_"poco cresc."} >> The bug might go away naturally

Re: Missing source tarball for 2.17.4

On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 3:11 AM, Phil Holmes wrote: > "Phil Holmes" wrote in message > news:k53d96$l2f$1...@ger.gmane.org... > >> "Patrick McCarty" wrote in message >> news:cagws8f7rnct5ywiarejpxn5dowcjmwfmpw1-q0frlqcydd1...@mail.gmail.com... >>> >>> Hello, >>> >>> I normally download source tar

Re: Fingering problems 2.17.4

On 11/10/12 08:02, Marek Klein wrote: > Hello, > 2012/10/10 Nick Payne > > > See example below: > > a) without any fingering orientation specified, the fingerings are > incorrectly placed, such that the two fingerings above the staff > collide, a

Re: Fingering problems 2.17.4

Hello, 2012/10/10 Nick Payne > See example below: > > a) without any fingering orientation specified, the fingerings are > incorrectly placed, such that the two fingerings above the staff > collide, and the fingerings also appear in the wrong order (the 0 should > not appear next to the E and the

Re: Bad unicode char value in error message

Hello, 2012/10/10 Nick Payne > See below. Trying to use the unicode character value for a two-em dash > gives an error message where the char value has been incremented by > 0x1000: > Thank you for the report, this has been added as http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2889 Ma

Re: [musicxml2ly] beams and lost lyric syllables

Hello, 2012/10/6 pls > I forgot to mention that syllables don't get lost when musicxml2ly is used > with the option --no-beaming. But this is only a dirty workaround as > LilyPonds' autobeaming algorithm overrides the beaming information provided > by the .xml-file. Beyond that we implemented a

Re: [musicxml2ly] unwanted staves and voices [was: missing -element in chorded note leads to unwanted additional staff]

Hello, 2012/10/3 pls > > now the summaries and descriptions of the issues got mixed up. I suggest > the following: > > Issue 2879: [musicxml2ly] spurious staff > if an .xml file contains only elements with value "1" (i.e. > 1) AND no element in a chorded note musicxml2ly > erroneously thinks th

Re: revitalizing a whole GrandStaff if only one Staff is alive

Am 10.10.2012 15:28, schrieb Thomas Morley: I added and approved it. Should be visible at: http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=853 although without an image. -Harm ok! let's leave it now! Eluze ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org h

Re: revitalizing a whole GrandStaff if only one Staff is alive

2012/10/10 Eluze : > > Am 10.10.2012 15:03, schrieb Thomas Morley: > > 2012/10/10 Eluze : > > Am 10.10.2012 14:13, schrieb Phil Holmes: > > "Eluze" wrote in message > news:50756197.4090...@gmail.com... > > Am 10.10.2012 10:59, schrieb Phil Holmes: > > Why don't you add this as a snippet to the LSR

Re: revitalizing a whole GrandStaff if only one Staff is alive

Am 10.10.2012 15:03, schrieb Thomas Morley: 2012/10/10 Eluze : Am 10.10.2012 14:13, schrieb Phil Holmes: "Eluze" wrote in message news:50756197.4090...@gmail.com... Am 10.10.2012 10:59, schrieb Phil Holmes: Why don't you add this as a snippet to the LSR, and tag is with "docs". That way

Re: revitalizing a whole GrandStaff if only one Staff is alive

2012/10/10 Eluze : > > Am 10.10.2012 14:13, schrieb Phil Holmes: > >> "Eluze" wrote in message >> news:50756197.4090...@gmail.com... >>> >>> >>> Am 10.10.2012 10:59, schrieb Phil Holmes: Why don't you add this as a snippet to the LSR, and tag is with "docs". That way it will au

Re: revitalizing a whole GrandStaff if only one Staff is alive

Am 10.10.2012 14:13, schrieb Phil Holmes: "Eluze" wrote in message news:50756197.4090...@gmail.com... Am 10.10.2012 10:59, schrieb Phil Holmes: Why don't you add this as a snippet to the LSR, and tag is with "docs". That way it will automatically appear in the snippets documentation, and

Re: revitalizing a whole GrandStaff if only one Staff is alive

- Original Message - From: "Thomas Morley" To: "Phil Holmes" Cc: ; "eluze" Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2012 1:39 PM Subject: Re: revitalizing a whole GrandStaff if only one Staff is alive 2012/10/10 Phil Holmes : "Eluze" wrote in message news:50756197.4090...@gmail.com... Am 1

Re: revitalizing a whole GrandStaff if only one Staff is alive

2012/10/10 Phil Holmes : > "Eluze" wrote in message > news:50756197.4090...@gmail.com... > >> >> Am 10.10.2012 10:59, schrieb Phil Holmes: >>> >>> >>> Why don't you add this as a snippet to the LSR, and tag is with "docs". >>> That way it will automatically appear in the snippets documentation, an

Re: revitalizing a whole GrandStaff if only one Staff is alive

"Eluze" wrote in message news:50756197.4090...@gmail.com... Am 10.10.2012 10:59, schrieb Phil Holmes: Why don't you add this as a snippet to the LSR, and tag is with "docs". That way it will automatically appear in the snippets documentation, and you can request a doc change to add the snip

Re: revitalizing a whole GrandStaff if only one Staff is alive

Am 10.10.2012 10:59, schrieb Phil Holmes: Why don't you add this as a snippet to the LSR, and tag is with "docs". That way it will automatically appear in the snippets documentation, and you can request a doc change to add the snippet. thanks for the idea - I did, but I get no output neit

Re: Missing source tarball for 2.17.4

"Phil Holmes" wrote in message news:k53d96$l2f$1...@ger.gmane.org... "Patrick McCarty" wrote in message news:cagws8f7rnct5ywiarejpxn5dowcjmwfmpw1-q0frlqcydd1...@mail.gmail.com... Hello, I normally download source tarballs for LilyPond from http://download.linuxaudio.org/lilypond/sources/v2.17

Re: Multiple \< \> \! under one note not working

Trevor Daniels wrote Wednesday, October 10, 2012 10:40 AM > > David Kastrup wrote Wednesday, October 10, 2012 10:27 AM > >> Rutger Hofman writes: >> >>> I meet the following bug: >>> >>> \version "2.16.0" >>> >>> { >>> % \override Hairpin #'minimum-length = #5 >>> \time 3/4 >>> \cle

Re: Multiple \< \> \! under one note not working

David Kastrup wrote Wednesday, October 10, 2012 10:27 AM > Rutger Hofman writes: > >> I meet the following bug: >> >> \version "2.16.0" >> >> { >> % \override Hairpin #'minimum-length = #5 >> \time 3/4 >> \clef F >> << e2. { s4\< s4\> s4\!_"poco cresc." } >> | >> d2. | >> } >

Re: Multiple \< \> \! under one note not working

Rutger Hofman writes: > Good morning bug list, > > I meet the following bug: > > \version "2.16.0" > > { > % \override Hairpin #'minimum-length = #5 > \time 3/4 > \clef F > << e2. { s4\< s4\> s4\!_"poco cresc." } >> | > d2. | > } > > which puts a < from the first 4 until the s

Multiple \< \> \! under one note not working

Good morning bug list, I meet the following bug: \version "2.16.0" { % \override Hairpin #'minimum-length = #5 \time 3/4 \clef F << e2. { s4\< s4\> s4\!_"poco cresc." } >> | d2. | } which puts a < from the first 4 until the second, a > from the second 4 to the third 4, and

Re: revitalizing a whole GrandStaff if only one Staff is alive

"Eluze" wrote in message news:1349815155181-134511.p...@n5.nabble.com... I suggest to add after NR: /Hiding staves/ a section should be added to explain how to keep alive a full GrandStaff even if only one of its staves is alive *Showing the full GrandStaff if only one Staff is playing* if on

Re: Missing source tarball for 2.17.4

"Patrick McCarty" wrote in message news:cagws8f7rnct5ywiarejpxn5dowcjmwfmpw1-q0frlqcydd1...@mail.gmail.com... Hello, I normally download source tarballs for LilyPond from http://download.linuxaudio.org/lilypond/sources/v2.17/, but the 2.17.4 tarball appears to be missing. Was the source tarbal