2012/10/10 Phil Holmes <m...@philholmes.net>: > "Eluze" <elu...@gmail.com> wrote in message > news:50756197.4090...@gmail.com... > >> >> Am 10.10.2012 10:59, schrieb Phil Holmes: >>> >>> >>> Why don't you add this as a snippet to the LSR, and tag is with "docs". >>> That way it will automatically appear in the snippets documentation, and you >>> can request a doc change to add the snippet. >>> >> >> thanks for the idea - I did, but I get no output neither with Standalone >> snippet or Large snippet checked. any idea what's wrong? >> Eluze > > > No idea. However, I have approved it and so it should appear in the tarball > and in the release when I next import the LSR into the source. Keep an eye > on the snippets in the docs and when it's there, you could propose a > documentation change to put the snippet into the NR somewhere. > > > -- > Phil Holmes > Bug Squad > > > _______________________________________________ > bug-lilypond mailing list > bug-lilypond@gnu.org > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Hi Phil, I wanted to test Eluze's observation and added a new snippet containing the code of Eluze's initial mail, naming it "Eluze". Hope you didn't _approve_ that_ snippet. http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=854 I didn't add any proper description. It was for testing only. -Harm _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
