Re: [Bit-team] Big diff on gnome/settingsdialog.py

2009-10-20 Thread Dan
I did noticed in a file (I forgot which one) that some tabs became spaces. I do prefer tabs. I used them in all sources so please use tabs too. Python is not very flexible about mixing them. No problem, Dan Richard Bailey wrote: Hey guys, I just submitted a revision that looks like it changed

Re: [Bit-team] new snapshot location

2009-10-21 Thread Dan
should be always in the new format. Best regards, Dan Bart wrote: A fast look pointed out that there was probably only one slight mistake in the kde version: a can_backup without a profile_id. So it might work now too, however I cannot test it right now... Cheers, Bart 2009/10/21

Re: [Bit-team] Backup hour

2009-10-22 Thread Dan
hours for each folder can be nice but it may take a lot of work and I don't think it really worth it. It can be a future improvement. Regards, Dan Richard Bailey wrote: Hey guys, I pushed the code for the backup hour option to this branch: https://code.launchpad.net/~rmjb/backintime/bac

Re: [Bit-team] Backup hour

2009-10-27 Thread Dan
ctory don't generate this file ? If you do then this is a bug. The format it is simple: on line per folder. Each line contains items separated buy ':'. The fields are: path, year, month, day, hour, minute. Regards, Dan Richard Bailey wrote: Hey Dan, I did what you suggested w

[Bit-team] BIT Authors

2009-11-02 Thread Dan
Hi, Since you work on the project I would like to add you in authors list. Is it ok with you ? Can I put your email ? For help & man pages I'm thinking to put "BIT team" and "bit-team@lists.launchpad.net". What do yo

Re: [Bit-team] BackInTime in Karmic

2009-11-02 Thread Dan
Must be X changes. When BIT is running under user A and the X under user B, A can't access it unless B allow it (I think is about xhost). Regards, Dan Richard Bailey wrote: I upgraded to Karmic this weekend and get a pleasant surprise with BiT. My backups are actually scheduled as

Re: [Bit-team] BIT Authors

2009-11-02 Thread Dan
OK, I'll your name and email addresses :) For the man & help I'll put bit-team & bit-team mail as contact (it more general). Regards, Dan Richard Bailey wrote: I prefer my own name and email address in the AUTHORS file. But I'll go with what the team decides. On M

Re: [Bit-team] Where does development happen?

2009-11-03 Thread Dan
fix a bug / make a nice feature you can ask for a merge. Then f all the team members agree you can became a BIT Team member. Best regards, Dan Alex Launi wrote: Hi back-in-time people, I really love back in time. I think it's the best backup solution for the linux desktop I've s

Re: [Bit-team] Where does development happen?

2009-11-04 Thread Dan
Team email. Do you know if this is possible in launchpad ? Regards, Dan Alex Launi wrote: You should really have a public mailing list or IRC chat or something like that, it's discouraging as a developer when I'm not sure how to communicate with the team. Definitely the team should

Re: [Bit-team] Changing importance bugs

2009-11-09 Thread Dan
Hi, It seems that I can do it but I didn't find anywhere how to change it !!! BIT Team should have all the rights to this. Do you know where I can change it ? Regards, Dan Bart wrote: Hey, Dan can you set the team to be the bug-supervisor, we might be able to set the importance of

Re: [Bit-team] Changing importance bugs

2009-11-10 Thread Dan
I don't see it. I setup the maintainer to BIT Team. Let me know if it works. Best regards, Dan Bart wrote: I do not have a clue. Isn't it possible to do that on the bugs page? Or on the projects overview page? When I am logged in I do not see any ! on those pages, but that might

Re: [Bit-team] Changing importance bugs

2009-11-10 Thread Dan
<https://launchpad.net/%7Ebit-team/+members>. The person or team responsible for bug management. So sorry Dan you are the one that should do it. On the bug overview page you can change the supervisor by clicking on the yellow button behind it... Cheers, Bart 2009/11/10 Dan mailto:d...@le-web.

Re: [Bit-team] language file for backintime in Japanse

2009-11-12 Thread Dan
Hi Toshiharu Kudoh, Thank you for your translation. BIT is managed in launchpad (code, translations and bugs): https://launchpad.net/backintime Please use it to upload your translation and don't hesitate to report bugs. Best Regards, Dan Toshiharu Kudoh wrote: > Dear Oprea, > &

[Bit-team] [Bug 481673] Re: [enhancement] view diffs

2009-11-13 Thread Dan
When you select an item (file or folder) you can see all snapshots where it exists. From this dialog you can make a diff between different snapshots (including 'Now'). By default Gnome version use "meld" which is able to make a diff between folders too. -- [enhancement] view diffs https://bugs.l

[Bit-team] [Bug 406092] Re: Deleted Files are stored in snapshots forever

2009-11-13 Thread Dan
I confirm, the bug is valid. Your procedure prove it. rsync has the option " --delete-excluded" to remove excluded files. This can fix the bug but it can disable schedule per include directory (or it need to be redesigned). -- Deleted Files are stored in snapshots forever https://bugs.launchpad

[Bit-team] [Bug 412695] Re: Accentuated letters are not handled correctly

2009-11-13 Thread Dan
** Changed in: backintime Status: Incomplete => Fix Committed -- Accentuated letters are not handled correctly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/412695 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Back In Time Team, which is subscribed to Back In Time. Status in Back In Ti

[Bit-team] [Bug 481673] Re: [enhancement] view diffs

2009-11-13 Thread Dan
** Changed in: backintime Importance: Undecided => Wishlist ** Changed in: backintime Status: New => Won't Fix -- [enhancement] view diffs https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/481673 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Back In Time Team, which is subscribed to Bac

[Bit-team] [Bug 482170] Re: Add encryption

2009-11-13 Thread Dan
BIT only backup files/folders as they are. If it read them decrypted it will backup them decrypted. If it read them encrypted it will backup the encrypted. But nothing stops you to have an encrypted file system on your NAS server. ** Changed in: backintime Importance: Undecided => Wishlist --

[Bit-team] [Bug 412695] Re: Accentuated letters are not handled correctly

2009-11-13 Thread Dan
** Changed in: backintime Importance: Undecided => High -- Accentuated letters are not handled correctly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/412695 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Back In Time Team, which is subscribed to Back In Time. Status in Back In Time: Fix Co

[Bit-team] [Bug 406092] Re: Deleted Files are stored in snapshots forever

2009-11-13 Thread Dan
** Changed in: backintime Importance: Undecided => High -- Deleted Files are stored in snapshots forever https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/406092 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Back In Time Team, which is subscribed to Back In Time. Status in Back In Time: Confir

[Bit-team] [Bug 400501] Re: backintime-gnome -s bug if filename includes spaces

2009-11-13 Thread Dan
In current release version (0.9.26) the script run: python ${APP_PATH}/app.py "$*" which does not handle spaces correctly Now it runs: python ${APP_PATH}/app.py "$@" This fix is commited. ** Changed in: backintime Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed -- backintime-gnome -s bug if filenam

[Bit-team] [Bug 447841] Re: Soft links in snapshots should not be browseable

2009-11-13 Thread Dan
Soft links are copied as soft links and it is true that Gnome version don't display them different. KDE version on the other hand display them italic. I agree that Gnome version should display them italic too. Even more, if the link is broken it should display it different too. -- Soft links in

[Bit-team] [Bug 447841] Re: Soft links in snapshots should not be browseable

2009-11-13 Thread Dan
Soft links are displayed italic and broken soft links italic with a bold '!' char before. ** Changed in: backintime Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed -- Soft links in snapshots should not be browseable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/447841 You received this bug notification because you

[Bit-team] [Bug 396436] Re: newest version doesnt work with ubuntu hardy

2009-11-13 Thread Dan
I think -X flag exists from version 3. Hardy must have a older version but newer version exists in backports. -- newest version doesnt work with ubuntu hardy https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/396436 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Back In Time Team, which is subscribe

[Bit-team] [Bug 385806] Re: Backintime fails to launch with "No module named PyKDE4.kdecore"

2009-11-13 Thread Dan
This is a library problem: kde libraries has a version and pykde expect another version. kde and pykde should be consistent. This happens usually with alpha/beta/rc releases. There is nothing that can be done on BIT side. ** Changed in: backintime Status: Incomplete => Invalid -- Backi

[Bit-team] [Bug 378388] Re: rsync syntax or usage error (code 1), returns 256

2009-11-13 Thread Dan
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 396436 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/396436 You need to use rsync 3 or latter. It should be available in backports repository. ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 396436 newest version doesnt work with ubuntu hardy ** Changed in: backint

[Bit-team] [Bug 482688] Re: [enhancement] should be able to backup things in multiple locations

2009-11-14 Thread Dan
This will be available using profiles. Each profile can have a different destination. ** Changed in: backintime Status: New => Fix Committed ** Changed in: backintime Importance: Undecided => Medium -- [enhancement] should be able to backup things in multiple locations https://bugs.la

[Bit-team] [Bug 430646] Re: Hardlink issues in mounted ssh filesystems

2009-11-17 Thread Dan
The problem with --link-dest is that the files must have the save rights/user/group. I experienced some problems for file systems without full rights/owners support (like NTFS). To create hard links I use cp -al which should work -- Hardlink issues in mounted ssh filesystems https://bugs.lau

[Bit-team] [Bug 447841] Re: Soft links in snapshots should not be browseable

2009-11-18 Thread Dan
If the soft link is relative and it point to a file/folder inside the snapshot that is can be nice to browse/open it. If it is outside I may look like it is inside ... so this is bad. OK, if the link is inside the snapshot (and it is not broken) the user should be able to open/browse it. If not i

[Bit-team] [Bug 447841] Re: Soft links in snapshots should not be browseable

2009-11-19 Thread Dan
Symlinks can be both absolute or relative. You can compare a symlink to a simple text file where is written the destination path. If the symlink is relative then the start point is the symlink path. Ex: path /abc/a cd /abc ln -s a b <= relative symlink to ./a ln -s /abc/a c => absolute symlink

[Bit-team] [Bug 485879] Re: BiT only creates 3 days of backups

2009-11-20 Thread Dan
Smart remove rules: * keep all snapshots from today and yesterday * keep one snapshot for the last week and one for two weeks ago * keep one snapshot per month for all previous months of this year * keep one snapshot per year for all previous years So it looks ok. Can you confirm ?

Re: [Bit-team] Fwd: [Question #90967]: interrupted backup

2009-11-21 Thread Dan
I think this is a very good idea. Of course we have to check that new_snapshot is not too old (no more than few days). Regards, Dan Bart wrote: ,Hey Dan, why do we actually delete the new_snapshot folder if it exists already, and not just continue? rsync will makes sure that it will be

Re: [Bit-team] Merges

2009-11-21 Thread Dan
Hi Bard, Can you please merge you new directory structure ? If you will wait too much the merge will be difficult. Regards, Dan Bart wrote: Hey Guys, I just merged my both proposals (keeping hardlinks also within snapshots, and the snapshot location). So if anything is going wrong, let me

[Bit-team] [Bug 447841] Re: Soft links in snapshots should not be browseable

2009-11-21 Thread Dan
- os.path.islink: tell us if is a symbolic link or not - os.path.exist: tell us if the target exists or is broken - os.readlink: we can get the link target (if is relative it does not start with '/') We can convert the target path to an absolute path and check if this path is inside current snaps

[Bit-team] New directory structure

2009-11-23 Thread Dan
upgrade (and update the info file). How to you do it for now ? If the application is not configured (or if the user change snapshots path) you then: - if the folder has not snapshots just update info file - if the folder has snapshots and the version is old (or miss

[Bit-team] [Bug 487785] Re: Cannot open BiT anymore

2009-11-25 Thread Dan
This is a known bug but I can't reproduce it. A quick fix is to edit "~/.config/backintime/config" and remove the gnome.last_path line. Before removing it please copy the line to this bug. ** Changed in: backintime Importance: Undecided => Medium ** Changed in: backintime Status: New =

[Bit-team] Fwd: back in time

2009-11-27 Thread Dan
FYI -- Forwarded message -- From: Paul Date: Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 2:41 PM Subject: back in time To: Oprea Dan Hi, Since i switched from mac Os to Ubuntu, i was looking for a replacement for time machine-like backup application. Grsync is ok, but your backup tool is great, in

bit-team@lists.launchpad.net

2009-11-27 Thread Dan
** Changed in: backintime Status: New => Confirmed -- can't exclude directory named with & https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/489319 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Back In Time Team, which is subscribed to Back In Time. Status in Back In Time: Confirmed Bug d

[Bit-team] [Bug 489380] [NEW] BIT must use ACL/xattr only if rsync support them

2009-11-27 Thread Dan
Public bug reported: If rsync is not build with ACL or xattr then BIT should not use them. ** Affects: backintime Importance: Undecided Status: Confirmed ** Changed in: backintime Status: New => Confirmed -- BIT must use ACL/xattr only if rsync support them https://bugs.la

[Bit-team] [Bug 447841] Re: Soft links in snapshots should not be browseable

2009-11-29 Thread Dan
** Changed in: backintime Status: In Progress => Fix Committed -- Soft links in snapshots should not be browseable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/447841 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Back In Time Team, which is subscribed to Back In Time. Status in Back I

[Bit-team] [Bug 489385] Re: Back In Time schedule hangs, but "manual" backup works

2009-11-29 Thread Dan
BIT log using syslog. Please check your syslog for lines containing "backintime". -- Back In Time schedule hangs, but "manual" backup works https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/489385 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Back In Time Team, which is subscribed to Back In Time.

bit-team@lists.launchpad.net

2009-11-29 Thread Dan
** Changed in: backintime Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed -- can't exclude directory named with & https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/489319 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Back In Time Team, which is subscribed to Back In Time. Status in Back In Time: Fix Co

[Bit-team] [Bug 489380] Re: BIT must use ACL/xattr only if rsync support them

2009-11-29 Thread Dan
** Changed in: backintime Status: Confirmed => In Progress -- BIT must use ACL/xattr only if rsync support them https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/489380 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Back In Time Team, which is subscribed to Back In Time. Status in Back In T

[Bit-team] [Bug 489385] Re: Back In Time schedule hangs, but "manual" backup works

2009-11-30 Thread Dan
Looks like a crash ! -- Back In Time schedule hangs, but "manual" backup works https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/489385 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Back In Time Team, which is subscribed to Back In Time. Status in Back In Time: New Bug description: Using Kubuntu

[Bit-team] [Bug 489380] Re: BIT must use ACL/xattr only if rsync support them

2009-11-30 Thread Dan
** Changed in: backintime Status: In Progress => Fix Committed -- BIT must use ACL/xattr only if rsync support them https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/489380 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Back In Time Team, which is subscribed to Back In Time. Status in Back

[Bit-team] Release 1.0

2009-11-30 Thread Dan
Hi Bart & Richard, What do you think, are we ready for the release ? Is there anything you want to change for this release ? I think 1.0 can be a nice Christmas gift :) Best regards, Dan ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~bit-team Pos

Re: [Bit-team] Release 1.0

2009-11-30 Thread Dan
hing is clear. >From my point of view there are more CONS than PROS for this feature. What do you think ? Do you have good reasons not to remove it ? I'm ready to remove it for 1.0 but I'm not alone anymore on this project ... :) Regards, Dan On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 11:31 AM, Richard

[Bit-team] [Bug 396436] Re: newest version doesnt work with ubuntu hardy

2009-11-30 Thread Dan
Now BIT tries to detect rsync capabilities. ** Changed in: backintime Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed -- newest version doesnt work with ubuntu hardy https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/396436 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Back In Time Team, which is subscr

[Bit-team] [Bug 454009] Re: wish: Multiple profiles for different backup frequencies

2009-11-30 Thread Dan
Profiles are committed. ** Changed in: backintime Status: New => Fix Committed -- wish: Multiple profiles for different backup frequencies https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/454009 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Back In Time Team, which is subscribed to Back I

[Bit-team] [Bug 422543] Re: free space is not checked on forehand

2009-11-30 Thread Dan
Well even if rsync continues in the end it will be an uncompleted snapshot. BIT should detect this. -- free space is not checked on forehand https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/422543 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Back In Time Team, which is subscribed to Back In Time

Re: [Bit-team] Release 1.0

2009-12-01 Thread Dan
; Then we are all OK: no more schedule per included directory. There should be 2 more points: 1. In /backintime there should be an info file with the structure version. 2. In settings for the shapshots path there should be "Advanced options" to force host/user/profile. For 2.0 we can add: -

Re: [Bit-team] Release 1.0

2009-12-01 Thread Dan
t to another (or just another user). Because of the new structure you can't restore from someone else. You should be able to force this (as advanced options). About "--delete-excluded". I already remove it :) Regards, Dan On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 3:54 PM, Bart wrote: > > &

Re: [Bit-team] Release 1.0

2009-12-02 Thread Dan
contains current host and all other host into backup folder, user contains current user and all users in backup folder for selected host (it update if the host combo change) and the profile id contains current id and all id's for current host+user. Regards, Dan On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 6:25 PM,

[Bit-team] [Bug 489385] Re: Back In Time schedule hangs, but "manual" backup works

2009-12-02 Thread Dan
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 441628 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/441628 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 441628 BAckintime crash when screen locked -- Back In Time schedule hangs, but "manual" backup works https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/489385 You received this

[Bit-team] [Bug 441628] Re: BAckintime crash when screen locked

2009-12-02 Thread Dan
** Changed in: backintime Status: Triaged => Fix Committed -- BAckintime crash when screen locked https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/441628 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Back In Time Team, which is subscribed to Back In Time. Status in Back In Time: Fix Commi

Re: [Bit-team] Release 1.0

2009-12-02 Thread Dan
OK as long as you can migrate the backup from an old computer to a new one. Maybe in the future we can provide a migration tool, but until then ... You are right, the battery should be a standard option not an advanced one. Regards, Dan On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 1:26 PM, Bart wrote: > OK sho

[Bit-team] [Bug 441628] Re: BAckintime crash when screen locked

2009-12-02 Thread Dan
displaying the icon. Regards, Dan -- BAckintime crash when screen locked https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/441628 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Back In Time Team, which is subscribed to Back In Time. Status in Back In Time: Fix Committed Bug description: Using up to date

[Bit-team] [Bug 485879] Re: BiT only creates 3 days of backups

2009-12-02 Thread Dan
There one thing I just noticed: you are using 0.9.20. Version 0.9.26 * Fix a bug in smart-remove algorithm (https://bugs.launchpad.net/backintime/+bug/376104) You need to upgrade version. ** Changed in: backintime Status: Incomplete => Fix Released -- BiT only creates 3 days of backups

Re: [Bit-team] Include other snapshot folders

2009-12-03 Thread Dan
uld know that the project is not dead :) Regards, Dan On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 11:21 AM, Bart wrote: > Hi Dan, > > 1. well under the hood it is arranged (I needed it to solve the migration > issue, when somebody does not want to move his/hers snapshots (yet)), > however I did not

[Bit-team] [Bug 478429] Re: Backup ends when a file > 4gb should be saved on a FAT32 filesystem

2009-12-03 Thread Dan
FAT is not a good choice for BIT because it hoes not support hardlinks. -- Backup ends when a file > 4gb should be saved on a FAT32 filesystem https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/478429 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Back In Time Team, which is subscribed to Back In Ti

[Bit-team] [Bug 477603] Re: backintime hangs w/o network presence of previously backedup network share

2009-12-03 Thread Dan
We can parse /etc/mtab (and fstab) or mount output to get mount points and file systems. -- backintime hangs w/o network presence of previously backedup network share https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/477603 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Back In Time Team, which is

[Bit-team] [Bug 367180] Re: backup directory changes every time application is launched!

2009-12-03 Thread Dan
No more new on this bug. I'm change it to invalid. ** Changed in: backintime Status: Incomplete => Invalid -- backup directory changes every time application is launched! https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/367180 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Back In Time Tea

[Bit-team] [Bug 477603] Re: backintime hangs w/o network presence of previously backedup network share

2009-12-03 Thread Dan
Well, this is not the goal of BIT. It can't be a swiss knife. For special needs (like this one) users can user.callback script to do thinks before and after backup process. -- backintime hangs w/o network presence of previously backedup network share https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/477603 You re

[Bit-team] [Bug 406092] Re: Deleted Files are stored in snapshots forever

2009-12-04 Thread Dan
Just test it and it seems to work. So no longer schedule per included directory. Use profiles instead. ** Changed in: backintime Status: In Progress => Fix Committed -- Deleted Files are stored in snapshots forever https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/406092 You received this bug notification

[Bit-team] [Bug 478429] Re: Backup ends when a file > 4gb should be saved on a FAT32 filesystem

2009-12-07 Thread Dan
I agree, BIT should warn the user when it select to backup on a FAT32 drive (max 4G per file and no hard-links). A better option for a windows/linux filesystem is NTFS: is support bigger files/drives and hard-links. -- Backup ends when a file > 4gb should be saved on a FAT32 filesystem https://

[Bit-team] [Bug 493558] Re: Update snapshot button causes confusion

2009-12-07 Thread Dan
The button is there for people who start BIT before plugging-in the external drive. This button force to refresh the GUI. I agree, "Refresh snapshots" is a better name. ** Changed in: backintime Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed -- Update snapshot button causes confusion https://bugs.la

[Bit-team] [Bug 494225] Re: Backups being deleted Ubuntu 9.10 x64

2009-12-09 Thread Dan
Please check your syslog for lines containing "backintime". -- Backups being deleted Ubuntu 9.10 x64 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/494225 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Back In Time Team, which is subscribed to Back In Time. Status in Back In Time: New Bug desc

[Bit-team] [Bug 430646] Re: Hardlink issues in mounted ssh filesystems

2009-12-09 Thread Dan
The problem seems to be related to sshfs: http://www.oreillynet.com/onlamp/blog/2006/11/mounting_a_remote_filesystem_w.html You can try to use "use_ino" option: http://osdir.com/ml/file-systems.fuse.sshfs/2006-09/msg6.html Regards, Dan -- Hardlink issues in mounted ssh filesys

[Bit-team] ionice

2009-12-09 Thread Dan
is why ionice should be used inside the application and to run the application. Regards, Dan -- Sent from my phone. Please excuse my brevity.___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~bit-team Post to : bit-team@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https

[Bit-team] [Bug 494225] Re: Backups being deleted Ubuntu 9.10 x64

2009-12-10 Thread Dan
Please run from command line: backintime --backup-job -- Backups being deleted Ubuntu 9.10 x64 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/494225 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Back In Time Team, which is subscribed to Back In Time. Status in Back In Time: New Bug descrip

[Bit-team] [Bug 496029] Re: automatic backups hang in Kubuntu

2009-12-13 Thread Dan
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 441628 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/441628 There is a problem with kde4 systray icon plugin. I has been rewritten for the next version. ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 441628 BAckintime crash when screen locked -- automatic backups

[Bit-team] [Bug 494225] Re: Backups being deleted Ubuntu 9.10 x64

2009-12-14 Thread Dan
Strange, in the output it does not tries to remove snapshots. Even more I don't see why it is not logged in your syslog. Do you have older syslog files ? -- Backups being deleted Ubuntu 9.10 x64 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/494225 You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bit-team] [Bug 494225] Re: Backups being deleted Ubuntu 9.10 x64

2009-12-14 Thread Dan
I'd like to see logs where it decide to remove snapshots so I can try to understand why. If you have something like that please attach them. -- Backups being deleted Ubuntu 9.10 x64 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/494225 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Back In Time

Re: [Bit-team] ionice

2009-12-16 Thread Dan
Thanks Richard, Now that we have ionice, I'll try to make a beta release for testing ASAP. I do agree that the application should use smfs/sshfs. I start doing some tests on my side but this will be for the next releases. Regards, Dan On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 4:00 AM, Richard Bailey

[Bit-team] [Bug 496760] Re: support ssh/sftp

2009-12-16 Thread Dan
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 453169 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/453169 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 453169 (enhancement) backup to samba share, sshfs, ftp etc -- support ssh/sftp https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/496760 You received this bug notification beca

Re: [Bit-team] Snapshot relocation

2009-12-17 Thread Dan
only the choice to use or not ionice and not different levels. If he want to use ionice we can setup it up to best effort class 7 as you did (ilde may be to lower). I'll made the changes. Enjoy you vacation :) Regards, Dan On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 5:17 PM, Richard Bailey wrote: >

[Bit-team] [Bug 378656] Re: Add support for "ionice"

2009-12-17 Thread Dan
RealTime is only available for root. For the moment it will be only normal or ionice (ionice -c2 -n7) ** Changed in: backintime Status: In Progress => Fix Committed -- Add support for "ionice" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/378656 You received this bug notification because you are a memb

[Bit-team] Beta release: 0.9.99beta5

2009-12-18 Thread Dan
Hi, Just to let you know that I put the beta release on testing repository :) Best regards, Dan ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~bit-team Post to : bit-team@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~bit-team More help

[Bit-team] [Bug 441628] Re: BAckintime crash when screen locked

2009-12-23 Thread Dan
There was a merge problem. Please try beta6 version (testing repository). -- BAckintime crash when screen locked https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/441628 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Back In Time Team, which is subscribed to Back In Time. Status in Back In Time: F

[Bit-team] [Bug 501295] Re: can't delete old backups

2009-12-29 Thread Dan
Please run a check disk on you NTFS partition. -- can't delete old backups https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/501295 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Back In Time Team, which is subscribed to Back In Time. Status in Back In Time: New Bug description: back in time 0.9.

[Bit-team] [Bug 501285] Re: backintime-kde4 startup crash

2009-12-29 Thread Dan
** Changed in: backintime Status: New => Fix Committed -- backintime-kde4 startup crash https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/501285 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Back In Time Team, which is subscribed to Back In Time. Status in Back In Time: Fix Committed Bug

Re: [Bit-team] Beta release: 0.9.99beta5

2010-01-06 Thread Dan
Happy New Year !!! I released today beta9 ... because the KDE4 bug mutate :) If this is finished (and there will be no new blocking problems) then I'll release 1.0. Best regards, Dan On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 11:09 PM, Richard Bailey wrote: > Hey guys, Happy New Year to you both. Her

[Bit-team] [Bug 503859] [NEW] Backup on EncFS

2010-01-06 Thread Dan
Public bug reported: I cannot backup on EncFS (folder made with Cryptkeeper). Is that supposed to be possible? ** Affects: backintime Importance: High Status: Fix Committed ** Changed in: backintime Importance: Undecided => High ** Changed in: backintime Status: New => F

[Bit-team] [Bug 503914] Re: Backintime log line truncated

2010-01-07 Thread Dan
** Changed in: backintime Importance: Undecided => Medium -- Backintime log line truncated https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/503914 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Back In Time Team, which is subscribed to Back In Time. Status in Back In Time: New Bug description

[Bit-team] [Bug 502435] Re: "Smart remove" is not that smart

2010-01-07 Thread Dan
** Changed in: backintime Importance: Undecided => High -- "Smart remove" is not that smart https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/502435 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Back In Time Team, which is subscribed to Back In Time. Status in Back In Time: New Bug descriptio

[Bit-team] [Bug 502435] Re: "Smart remove" is not that smart

2010-01-07 Thread Dan
OK, the new rule will be "keep one snapshot per month for all previous months of this year and all months of the last year". -- "Smart remove" is not that smart https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/502435 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Back In Time Team, which is subscr

[Bit-team] [Bug 502435] Re: "Smart remove" is not that smart

2010-01-07 Thread Dan
** Changed in: backintime Status: New => Fix Committed -- "Smart remove" is not that smart https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/502435 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Back In Time Team, which is subscribed to Back In Time. Status in Back In Time: Fix Committed B

[Bit-team] [Bug 504480] Re: FR: Backup FROM and ftp or SSH connected server

2010-01-08 Thread Dan
You can use sshfs/curlftpfs to mount your server and then use BIT to backup mounted point. -- FR: Backup FROM and ftp or SSH connected server https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/504480 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Back In Time Team, which is subscribed to Back In Tim

[Bit-team] [Bug 504480] Re: FR: Backup FROM and ftp or SSH connected server

2010-01-08 Thread Dan
You can use sshfs/curlftpfs to mount your server and then use BIT to backup mounted point. -- FR: Backup FROM and ftp or SSH connected server https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/504480 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Back In Time Team, which is subscribed to Back In Tim

[Bit-team] [Bug 502160] Re: Customizable "Smart Remove" ala 'rsnapshot'

2010-01-08 Thread Dan
** Changed in: backintime Status: New => Confirmed ** Changed in: backintime Importance: Undecided => Wishlist -- Customizable "Smart Remove" ala 'rsnapshot' https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/502160 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Back In Time Team, which i

[Bit-team] [Bug 503914] Re: Backintime log line truncated

2010-01-11 Thread Dan
** Changed in: backintime Status: New => Confirmed -- Backintime log line truncated https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/503914 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Back In Time Team, which is subscribed to Back In Time. Status in Back In Time: Confirmed Bug descript

[Bit-team] [Bug 505694] Re: [enhancement] include hostname in backup path

2010-01-11 Thread Dan
This is already implemented (for the next version: 1.0). The new format will be: $DEST/backintime/$host/$user/$prfileid/$when/backup/$origpath You can try it from testing repository. ** Changed in: backintime Status: New => Confirmed ** Changed in: backintime Importance: Undecided => H

[Bit-team] [Bug 507250] Re: failure to backup -> no feedback

2010-01-14 Thread Dan
** Changed in: backintime Status: New => Confirmed ** Changed in: backintime Importance: Undecided => High -- failure to backup -> no feedback https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/507250 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Back In Time Team, which is subscribed to

[Bit-team] [Bug 506876] Re: BiT continually stuck on Comparing snapshot...and permission problems

2010-01-14 Thread Dan
kup/TPX60s/backintime/20100112-090001/backup/" Please try it (modify old snapshot name if needed). Are you having a lot of files ? (rsync can be very slow in this case) -- BiT continually stuck on Comparing snapshot...and permission problems https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/506876 You received thi

[Bit-team] [Bug 503859] Re: Backup on EncFS

2010-01-14 Thread Dan
Strange ... it does work for me. Please do this test from a terminal: - go to snapshots folder (~/../backintime/$machine/$user/$profile) - run "du -sh ." to get disk usage by all snapshots - run "du -sh $snapshot" for each snapshot If hard-links are used than the first value should be smaller tha

[Bit-team] [Bug 507451] Re: [Enhancement] Bit doesn't allow to specify the hour programmed to do the daily backup.

2010-01-15 Thread Dan
** Changed in: backintime Importance: Undecided => Medium ** Changed in: backintime Status: New => In Progress -- [Enhancement] Bit doesn't allow to specify the hour programmed to do the daily backup. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/507451 You received this bug notification because yo

[Bit-team] [Bug 450148] Re: Back In Time should have an option for checking the saved files

2010-01-15 Thread Dan
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 507246 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/507246 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 507246 failure to backup -> everything is sunshine -- Back In Time should have an option for checking the saved files https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/450148

[Bit-team] [Bug 506876] Re: BiT continually stuck on Comparing snapshot...and permission problems

2010-01-15 Thread Dan
, which is subscribed to Back In Time. Status in Back In Time: New Bug description: I'm posting this as requested by Dan on the Answers section https://answers.launchpad.net/backintime/+question/97137 BiT seems to have stopped working for me on a fresh installation of openSUSE 11.2. It see

[Bit-team] [Bug 506876] Re: BiT continually stuck on Comparing snapshot...and permission problems

2010-01-15 Thread Dan
rmission problems https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/506876 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Back In Time Team, which is subscribed to Back In Time. Status in Back In Time: New Bug description: I'm posting this as requested by Dan on the Answers section https://an

[Bit-team] [Bug 506876] Re: BiT continually stuck on Comparing snapshot...and permission problems

2010-01-16 Thread Dan
are a member of Back In Time Team, which is subscribed to Back In Time. Status in Back In Time: New Bug description: I'm posting this as requested by Dan on the Answers section https://answers.launchpad.net/backintime/+question/97137 BiT seems to have stopped working for me on a fresh insta

  1   2   >