Re: [Bacula-users] Bad story

2005-05-16 Thread Ogee
Still, the version information is not really precise... When I had had the first trouble I'd been using 1.36.2, so I upgrade to 1.36.3, it means my 2nd problem was with version 1.36.3. Ok, so we have to assume then that there is no possibility of problems with the file system or disk drives... s

Re: [Bacula-users] Bad story

2005-05-16 Thread Ogee
Andrew Paterson wrote: Hi Ogee, you say you are getting checksum errors. Anyway, you should still have a file restored - but it will possibly be corrupt just as it would be if you were using another backup system. Sorry, you're not right, because I CAN'T RESTORE file and it means, that I c

Re: [Bacula-users] Bad story

2005-05-16 Thread Arno Lehmann
Hi, Andrew Paterson wrote: Hi Ogee, you say you are getting checksum errors. This will be because you are backing up files whilst they are changing. No backup system can cope with that. No. At least, I think so :-) I understand the problem to be a checksum error *on the backup volume*, not

Re: [Bacula-users] Bad story

2005-05-16 Thread Arno Lehmann
Hi. Ogee wrote: Apart from being disappointed you could also try to solve your problem. You see, being in constant development, and being Open Source, you can hardly expect bacula to work flawless in every case. But you can expect the developers and users to try and help you. And do you think I

RE: [Bacula-users] Bad story

2005-05-16 Thread Andrew Paterson
Hi Ogee, you say you are getting checksum errors. This will be because you are backing up files whilst they are changing. No backup system can cope with that. If you use (ufs)dump for instance it will appear to work but you will still get a corrupted file. The good thing about bacula is

Re: [Bacula-users] Bad story

2005-05-16 Thread Ogee
What on earth are you rambling about? Bacula is great, and covers all the typical (and more!) needs in a production enviroment! Bacula is, in my opinion, at this date the premiere solution for doing backups. I had thought so, but not know, because of problems, I have! One question to you Ogee:

Re: [Bacula-users] Bad story

2005-05-16 Thread Arno Lehmann
Hi. Ogee wrote: Hello, I would like to say, that I am very disappointed with bacula. The design is very nice, configuration si simple and clear, management is also good... BUT I would like to get backup from backup file for second time and for the second time I get (from different backup file

Re: [Bacula-users] Bad story

2005-05-16 Thread Christopher Rasch-Olsen Raa
man, 16,.05.2005 kl. 13.11 +0200, skrev Ogee: > Hello, > > I would like to say, that I am very disappointed with bacula. The > design is very nice, configuration si simple and clear, management is > also good... BUT I would like to get backup from backup file for second > time and for the s