Re: [Bacula-users] bug bacularis

Glad to hear it! في الجمعة، ١٣ ديسمبر ٢٠٢٤ ٤:٠٠ ص Marcin Haba كتب: > On Thu, 12 Dec 2024 at 20:14, wastn jak wrote: > > > > I noticed a bug on the login page. If you press "Next" without entering > a username and password, the issue occurs. > > Hi wastn, > > Yes, it's a bug. Many thanks for cat

Re: [Bacula-users] bug bacularis

On Thu, 12 Dec 2024 at 20:14, wastn jak wrote: > > I noticed a bug on the login page. If you press "Next" without entering a > username and password, the issue occurs. Hi wastn, Yes, it's a bug. Many thanks for catching it. It has been fixed. The fix is available from the next Bacularis releas

[Bacula-users] bug bacularis

I noticed a bug on the login page. If you press "Next" without entering a username and password, the issue occurs. Thank you Prado\Exceptions\TPhpErrorException Description [Warning] Undefined array key "" (@line 161 in file /var/www/bacularis/protected/vendor/

Re: [Bacula-users] Bug Baculum? 11.0.5.4 after cancel JOB of COPY

Hi Jose, I am able to reproduce this problem. It looks to be a bug in the Director. I reported it here: https://bugs.bacula.org/view.php?id=2650 Best regards, Marcin Haba (gani) On Tue, 7 Dec 2021 at 02:25, Jose Alberto wrote: > > Hi Marcin. > > In the bconsole it remains as canceled, status A

Re: [Bacula-users] Bug Baculum? 11.0.5.4 after cancel JOB of COPY

Hi Marcin. In the bconsole it remains as canceled, status A (aborted by the user), but in Baculum it remains in Running. To remove it, I must restart the director when the jobs are not running. It only happens when I cancel JOB of type copy. On Mon, Dec 6, 2021 at 9:16 PM Marcin Haba wrote: >

Re: [Bacula-users] Bug Baculum? 11.0.5.4 after cancel JOB of COPY

Hello Jose, What is the jobstatus in the Catalog database for the cancelled job? Could you check if there is letter 'A' or still 'R'? You can use just the bconsole 'list jobs' command for that. Best regards, Marcin Haba (gani) On Mon, 6 Dec 2021 at 22:10, Jose Alberto wrote: > > Hi. > > Use Bac

[Bacula-users] Bug Baculum? 11.0.5.4 after cancel JOB of COPY

Hi. Use Baculum, 11.0.5.4 i have a Job Copy (pool vtl to pool tape),. Work fine. But if JOB of Copy is cancel, Baculum keep showing RUNNING- But "status dir" que JOB was removed. Bug Baculum? -- # # Sistema Operativo: Debian

Re: [Bacula-users] Bug Baculum? Configure Devices and Autochanger (sd remote) , no show.

Hello Jose, In this case you can configure remote SD on the "Configure" page. It is some kind of limitation for remote SD in that place for the configure devices and the configure autochanger tabs. I hope the limit will be removed in the future but I can't determine when exactly it will be. Best

[Bacula-users] Bug Baculum? Configure Devices and Autochanger (sd remote) , no show.

Hi. Baculum 9.6.5 I have. Bacula 9.6.3 (Dir and SD) ip 10.10.1.2 And I have Bacula 9.6.3 (only SD) ip 10.20.5.2(remote site). all work fine.But the conf was write direct on bacula-sd.conf of remote SD. Configure Devices and Autochanger, no show. I assume for being a remote

Re: [Bacula-users] bug: resumed jobs should not be subject to "max start delay time"

Please submit a bug report with either the full bacula-dr.conf or all the resources concerning the job plus the full job report for the job that failed. Best RegardsKern Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone. Original message From: mark.berg...@uphs.upenn.edu Date: 7/21/17 00

[Bacula-users] bug: resumed jobs should not be subject to "max start delay time"

Bacula 7.4.7 When a job is stopped and then 'resumed', the 'max start delay time' paramater should not be applied. It is inconsistent to restart a job and then have it canceled immediately because it exceeded the max start delay. Thanks, Mark -- Mark Bergman

[Bacula-users] Bug in BAT file selection

I've just discovered a bug in BAT file selection for restores. If you have a directory containing a file whose name begins with a [ character, for instance: [1.7.10]BetterFonts1.1.4.jar (which is a Minecraft mod file), and you wish to restore only that file, you cannot mark it for restore. You c

Re: [Bacula-users] Bug when canceling a job in bconsole on 7.0.2?

Hello, Thanks for the feedback. Best regards, Kern On 06/10/2014 08:28 PM, Stephen Thompson wrote: > > > ver 7.0.4 does not appear to have the canceling job issue I saw in > 7.0.2. yay! ...and thanks. > > > > On 5/22/14 8:37 AM, Bill Arlofski wrote: >> On 05/22/14 11:28, Kern Sibbald wrote: >>>

Re: [Bacula-users] Bug when canceling a job in bconsole on 7.0.2?

ver 7.0.4 does not appear to have the canceling job issue I saw in 7.0.2. yay! ...and thanks. On 5/22/14 8:37 AM, Bill Arlofski wrote: > On 05/22/14 11:28, Kern Sibbald wrote: >> Hello Bill, >> >> I have also pushed a patch that may well fix the problem you are >> having with cancel. I have

Re: [Bacula-users] Bug when canceling a job in bconsole on 7.0.2?

Quoting message written on Friday 2014-05-23 16:14:50: > I haven't worked on the Next Pool directive issue yet -- it is next on > my list. > > Best regards, > Kern > > PS: I think you added a note to the "status storage" "bug". Since it is > very easy for me to simply close a bug report ( easier

Re: [Bacula-users] Bug when canceling a job in bconsole on 7.0.2?

Thanks. Another confirmation that it is now fixed would be good. If you get it in the next week great, otherwise I will release the fixes anyway and hopefully this bug will be behind us. Best regards, Kern On 05/23/2014 04:19 PM, Stephen Thompson wrote: > > > I may be able to test at the end of

Re: [Bacula-users] Bug when canceling a job in bconsole on 7.0.2?

I may be able to test at the end of the month. Right now I have continuous jobs running that I'd rather not inadvertently cancel. Stephen On 5/22/14 8:37 AM, Bill Arlofski wrote: > On 05/22/14 11:28, Kern Sibbald wrote: >> Hello Bill, >> >> I have also pushed a patch that may well fix the pr

Re: [Bacula-users] Bug when canceling a job in bconsole on 7.0.2?

Quoting message written on Thursday 2014-05-22 22:19:08: > Quoting message written on Thursday 2014-05-22 11:37:46: > > On 05/22/14 11:28, Kern Sibbald wrote: > > > Hello Bill, > > > > > > > > > > > > I have also pushed a patch that may well fix the problem you are > > > having with cancel. I hav

Re: [Bacula-users] Bug when canceling a job in bconsole on 7.0.2?

Quoting message written on Friday 2014-05-23 05:53:22: > > Does anybody know why the content in the messages sent as a reply > > to the bacula-user mailinglist gets tripled sometimes? > > > > Notice the example below or in my previous message. > > Hi Josip, > > I see it in your quote of that mes

Re: [Bacula-users] Bug when canceling a job in bconsole on 7.0.2?

Does anybody know why the content in the messages sent as a reply to the bacula-user mailinglist gets tripled sometimes? Notice the example below or in my previous message. Quoting message written on Thursday 2014-05-22 22:19:08: > Quoting message written on Thursday 2014-05-22 11:37:46: > > On

Re: [Bacula-users] Bug when canceling a job in bconsole on 7.0.2?

Quoting message written on Thursday 2014-05-22 11:37:46: > On 05/22/14 11:28, Kern Sibbald wrote: > > Hello Bill, > > > > I have also pushed a patch that may well fix the problem you are > > having with cancel. I have never been able to reproduce the problem, > > but I did yet another rewrite of

Re: [Bacula-users] Bug when canceling a job in bconsole on 7.0.2?

On 05/22/14 11:28, Kern Sibbald wrote: > Hello Bill, > > I have also pushed a patch that may well fix the problem you are > having with cancel. I have never been able to reproduce the problem, > but I did yet another rewrite of the sellist routine as well as > designed a number of tests, none of w

Re: [Bacula-users] Bug when canceling a job in bconsole on 7.0.2?

Specyfing "cancel jobid=" works OK 2014-05-04 15:33 GMT-03:00 Kern Sibbald : > Hello Bill, > > Yes, this one I would like to fix before releasing 7.0.3. By the way a > very crude workaround (at least I think it should work) would be to > specify the jobid with "cancel jobid=". I am

Re: [Bacula-users] Bug when canceling a job in bconsole on 7.0.2?

Hello Bill, Yes, this one I would like to fix before releasing 7.0.3. By the way a very crude workaround (at least I think it should work) would be to specify the jobid with "cancel jobid=". I am not one hundred percent sure that works, but I think so. What is surprising is that I tested th

Re: [Bacula-users] Bug when canceling a job in bconsole on 7.0.2?

On 05/04/14 08:48, Kern Sibbald wrote: > Please submit a bug report. Done. http://bugs.bacula.org/view.php?id=2056 Thanks Kern! -- Bill Arlofski Reverse Polarity, LLC http://www.revpol.com/ -- Not responsible for anything below this line --

Re: [Bacula-users] Bug when canceling a job in bconsole on 7.0.2?

Please submit a bug report. On 04/29/2014 04:11 AM, Bill Arlofski wrote: > I believe I just found a (minor) bug in bconsole. > > I have two jobs running that I wish to cancel. I typically cancel jobs with > higher numbers first so that new queued jobs have a chance to start as running > jobs are k

Re: [Bacula-users] Bug when canceling a job in bconsole on 7.0.2?

I believe I've seen this unwanted behaviour as well. I cannot test, as at the moment I have a job running that I could not have accidentally canceled, but this past weekend I attempted to cancel a running Incremental job by number (as I have successfully many times in the past), but somehow

Re: [Bacula-users] Bug when canceling a job in bconsole on 7.0.2?

Whoops... Clicked send too soon. Just a follow-up. I went ahead and chose #1 in the list to see if it would cancel both jobs. It did: *can Select Job(s): 1: JobId=25775 Job=Helpdesk.2014-04-28_20.30.00_52 2: JobId=25776 Job=Postbooks.2014-04-28_20.30.00_53 Choose Job list to cancel (

[Bacula-users] Bug when canceling a job in bconsole on 7.0.2?

I believe I just found a (minor) bug in bconsole. I have two jobs running that I wish to cancel. I typically cancel jobs with higher numbers first so that new queued jobs have a chance to start as running jobs are killed off. So, in this situation, I chose #2 i the list of jobs to cancel: *can S

[Bacula-users] BUG? Bacula 5.2.12 fails to recycle on-disk volume

Hi folks, sometimes we have a weird problem with bacula 5.2.12 (compiled from source on CentOS 6) getting stuck trying to recycle an on-disk volume. The clients where this problem crops up have their own storages, devices, pools and volumes (disk-based). We see a lot of messages in the logs lik

Re: [Bacula-users] Bug while refreshing job

2012/3/23 Nicolas : > Hi, > > When I refresh a Full Job (working with a base job), on BAT, the application > doesn't respond. The CPU of DIR server is at 100% on mysql. > > While rebooting mysql service, problem disapears, and I've got the error on > BAT : > > Select Distinct MediaType From MediaTy

[Bacula-users] Bug while refreshing job

Hi, When I refresh a Full Job (working with a base job), on BAT, the application doesn't respond. The CPU of DIR server is at 100% on mysql. While rebooting mysql service, problem disapears, and I've got the error on BAT : SELECT DISTINCT MEDIATYPE FROM MEDIATYPE ORDER BY MEDIATYPE I th

[Bacula-users] Bug: tapes not in autochanger being recycled.

5.0.1 (x86_64, rhel5) http://bugs.bacula.org/view.php?id=1540 As far as I can tell Bacula is ignoring the InChanger status. Is anyone else seeing this? -- Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software too

[Bacula-users] [BUG] "RegexWhere format" docs have mixed encodings

Hi, when I look at this section on the live site: http://www.bacula.org/en/rel-manual/Restore_Command.html#SECTION002252000 the list of allowed separators displays find under ISO-8859-1 but under UTF-8 (the detected encoding), a strange symbol appears between ! and ;. = / ! ; % : ,

Re: [Bacula-users] Bug or Feature Request - Config token too long?

Thank you. Great tip. I won't implement because I'd need to update though. But it did lead me to the right place. -Shon On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 10:16 AM, Arno Lehmann wrote: > Hi, > > 24.11.2009 15:47, Mingus Dew wrote: > > All, > > Running Bacula 3. on Solaris 10 x86. I'm setting up some

Re: [Bacula-users] Bug or Feature Request - Config token too long?

Hi, 24.11.2009 15:47, Mingus Dew wrote: > All, > Running Bacula 3. on Solaris 10 x86. I'm setting up some Copy jobs > using the Selection Type = SQLQuery. When I try to test the config file > I get the error: > > bac...@backup_svr: bacula-dir -t -c /opt/csw/etc/bacula/bacula-dir.conf > 24-

[Bacula-users] Bug or Feature Request - Config token too long?

All, Running Bacula 3. on Solaris 10 x86. I'm setting up some Copy jobs using the Selection Type = SQLQuery. When I try to test the config file I get the error: bac...@backup_svr: bacula-dir -t -c /opt/csw/etc/bacula/bacula-dir.conf 24-Nov 01:51 bacula-dir: ERROR TERMINATION at lex.c:270 Conf

Re: [Bacula-users] Bug or misuse, file are not save ?

Hi, 17.04.2009 14:48, Mike Ruskai wrote: > On 04/17/2009 08:27, Olivier Delestre wrote: >> Hello, >> >> A bug in bacula or misuse, I do not know. >> Let me explain. >> >> I have a folder 1 that is saved. I have a folder 2 that is not. >> The directories are on the same partition. >> >> Execution o

Re: [Bacula-users] Bug or misuse, file are not save ?

On 04/17/2009 08:27, Olivier Delestre wrote: > Hello, > > A bug in bacula or misuse, I do not know. > Let me explain. > > I have a folder 1 that is saved. I have a folder 2 that is not. > The directories are on the same partition. > > Execution of a total folder 1 saved in whole > Moving a file to

[Bacula-users] Bug or misuse, file are not save ?

Hello, A bug in bacula or misuse, I do not know. Let me explain. I have a folder 1 that is saved. I have a folder 2 that is not. The directories are on the same partition. Execution of a total folder 1 saved in whole Moving a file to the folder 2 to folder 1. Execution of an incremental, folder

Re: [Bacula-users] Bug or a feature :-)

Hi, 05.02.2009 06:55, Masopust, Christian wrote: > > Maybe I missed in the documentation but > > Today (ok, yesterday :-) I added a directory containing some old files > (last modification > date is before my last full-backup) to one of my filesets. > Now I'm wondering that they weren't ba

Re: [Bacula-users] Bug / RFE

Hi, 04.02.2009 23:29, Kevin Keane wrote: > Arno Lehmann wrote: >> Hi, >> >> 04.02.2009 19:13, Dupree, Craig wrote: >> >>> This is starting to get annoying >>> >>> Can the parts of bacula that ask for volume names not arbitrarily >>> use atoi on them? >>> >> Not easily, no... >> >> >

Re: [Bacula-users] Bug or a feature :-)

Normally, any change to a fileset should trigger a full backup, to address exactly that type of situation. Maybe you have Ignore Fileset Changes = yes in your fileset definition? That turns off that behavior. Masopust, Christian wrote: > Maybe I missed in the documentation but > > Today (

[Bacula-users] Bug or a feature :-)

Maybe I missed in the documentation but Today (ok, yesterday :-) I added a directory containing some old files (last modification date is before my last full-backup) to one of my filesets. Now I'm wondering that they weren't backed up (I assume because of so old modification time). Should

Re: [Bacula-users] Bug / RFE

Arno Lehmann wrote: > Hi, > > 04.02.2009 19:13, Dupree, Craig wrote: > >> This is starting to get annoying >> >> Can the parts of bacula that ask for volume names not arbitrarily >> use atoi on them? >> > > Not easily, no... > > >> Here is a good example where I want to purge a volum

Re: [Bacula-users] Bug / RFE

Hi, 04.02.2009 19:13, Dupree, Craig wrote: > This is starting to get annoying > > Can the parts of bacula that ask for volume names not arbitrarily > use atoi on them? Not easily, no... > Here is a good example where I want to purge a volume name, since I > know now the list of volumes that

[Bacula-users] Bug / RFE

This is starting to get annoying Can the parts of bacula that ask for volume names not arbitrarily use atoi on them? Here is a good example where I want to purge a volume name, since I know now the list of volumes that I want to purge and reuse for this month's backup set: Enter MediaId or

[Bacula-users] BUG? Bconsole/bgnome-console

Bacula 2.4.2, 64 bit, RHEL5 This is wierd, to say the least. I have a subset of files in a directory I want to restore. The directory doesn't show up in bconsole or in command line mode using bgnome console but DOES does show up in the GUI-restore function on the same bgnome console at the same

[Bacula-users] Bug in Documentation?

Juche, just going through the documentation I found something strange: Is this really true? Pool Directive Recycle Current Volume in http://www.bacula.org/en/rel-manual/Configuring_Director.html#DirectorChapter To me it seems that it doesn't match with the following: Recycling Algorithm http:/

Re: [Bacula-users] bug in website

jason bronson wrote: > No problem > Could you or anyone tell me if theres a way to communicate with bacula > if i built a web interface to modify things besides using sockets etc...? > how can i tell it to run a job like bconsole does? can i just insert > into mysql and it will automatically see

Re: [Bacula-users] bug in website

. -Original Message- From: Dan Langille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: jason bronson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: bacula users Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] bug in website Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2008 07:58:47 -0500 jason bronson wrote: > -Original Message- > *From*: Dan Langille

Re: [Bacula-users] bug in website

jason bronson wrote: > -Original Message- > *From*: Dan Langille <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> > *To*: jason bronson <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> > *Cc*: bacula users <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: [Bacula-users] bug in website

on baculas website under documentation -Original Message- From: Dan Langille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: jason bronson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: bacula users Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] bug in website Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2008 05:28:14 -0500 On Jan 28, 2008, at 10:20 PM, jason b

Re: [Bacula-users] bug in website

inal Message- > From: Dan Langille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: jason bronson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] bug in website > Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2008 21:21:04 -0500 > > jason bronson wrote: > There see

Re: [Bacula-users] bug in website

jason bronson wrote: > There seems to be a bug in the website i cannot get the PDF's for > developers stuff? says not found??? > http://www.bacula.org/en/?page=documentation > please reply back to my email when its fixed It's not broken for me. Try again. -- Dan Langille - http://www.langille.

[Bacula-users] bug in website

There seems to be a bug in the website i cannot get the PDF's for developers stuff? says not found??? http://www.bacula.org/en/?page=documentation please reply back to my email when its fixed Regards Jason Bronson [EMAIL PROTECTED] --

Re: [Bacula-users] bug?: Bacula 2.2.7 on Fedora 8 crashing with buffer overflow!

> On Tue, 8 Jan 2008 22:45:45 +0100, Michael (TNXLabs) said: > > Hello all, > > I tried to install Bacula 2.2.7 on Fedora 8 but its crashing with a buffer > overflow (see end of email). > > My Server is a fresh install with F8 and all updates available are applied. > I tried the following va

[Bacula-users] bug?: Bacula 2.2.7 on Fedora 8 crashing with buffer overflow!

Hello all, I tried to install Bacula 2.2.7 on Fedora 8 but its crashing with a buffer overflow (see end of email). My Server is a fresh install with F8 and all updates available are applied. I tried the following variants: Installation of f8-rpms from sourceforge -> crash Building the rpms mysel

Re: [Bacula-users] bug 969 not fixed

>> bug 969 shows as fixed in 2.2.5 but it is still broken for me as shown >> below. > Hi, > It seems that the 2.2.4-restore.patch doesn't have been applied to > the 2.2.5 release. Read 2.2.4-replace.patch instead of 2.2.4-restore.patch. > You can apply it yourself and rebuild the bacula-dir b

Re: [Bacula-users] bug 969 not fixed

> bug 969 shows as fixed in 2.2.5 but it is still broken for me as shown > below. Hi, It seems that the 2.2.4-restore.patch doesn't have been applied to the 2.2.5 release. You can apply it yourself and rebuild the bacula-dir binary or wait for the 2.2.6 release. Sorry for this inconvenience.

[Bacula-users] bug 969 not fixed

bug 969 shows as fixed in 2.2.5 but it is still broken for me as shown below. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ rpm -q bacula-mysql bacula-mysql-2.2.5-1 Run Restore job JobName: RestoreFiles Bootstrap: /var/bacula/buckeye-dir.restore.2.bsr Where: / Replace: always FileSet:

Re: [Bacula-users] Bug, upgrade from 2.0.3 to 2.2.4, Volume Retention?

On Mon, 1 Oct 2007, Arno Lehmann wrote: > That wouldn't help, because the oldest volume is not necessarily the > one to be selected for pruning/recycling. Hm, here it is. Every day there is a different pool (monday, tuesday, ...). Bacula chooses the right pool because of the JobDefs. In those po

Re: [Bacula-users] Bug, upgrade from 2.0.3 to 2.2.4, Volume Retention?

Hi, 01.10.2007 14:27,, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:: > On Mon, 1 Oct 2007, Arno Lehmann wrote: > >>> So now, I manually have to lookup the correct tape in the pool, check >>> which one is the oldest to know which one will be recycled. As I >>> understand it, the previous behaviour from Bacula 2.0.3 i

Re: [Bacula-users] Bug, upgrade from 2.0.3 to 2.2.4, Volume Retention?

On Mon, 1 Oct 2007, Arno Lehmann wrote: >> So now, I manually have to lookup the correct tape in the pool, check >> which one is the oldest to know which one will be recycled. As I >> understand it, the previous behaviour from Bacula 2.0.3 is the correct >> behaviour (after 13 days-> recycle, so,

Re: [Bacula-users] Bug, upgrade from 2.0.3 to 2.2.4, Volume Retention?

On Mon, 1 Oct 2007, Arno Lehmann wrote: > This is probably due to Bacula being much less aggressively recycling. > This is, as far as I recall, mentioned in the ReleaseNotes file. Strange, I've missed that one though I've read the file. So I should interprete Volume Retention now as 'Possible to

Re: [Bacula-users] Bug, upgrade from 2.0.3 to 2.2.4, Volume Retention?

Hi, 01.10.2007 11:28,, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:: > Hey list, > > I've just upgraded from 2.0.3 to 2.2.4. I have a scheme with a different > pool for each day. Each daily pool consist of 2 tapes, so we have a > retention for 2 weeks (except a friday-full backup has 6 tapes). This is > done so w

[Bacula-users] Bug, upgrade from 2.0.3 to 2.2.4, Volume Retention?

Hey list, I've just upgraded from 2.0.3 to 2.2.4. I have a scheme with a different pool for each day. Each daily pool consist of 2 tapes, so we have a retention for 2 weeks (except a friday-full backup has 6 tapes). This is done so we can store every daily backup in a safe place, away from the

Re: [Bacula-users] Bug with Maximum Volume Jobs on bacula 2.0.3?!

Hello, 05.09.2007 21:31,, Xeos Laenor wrote:: > Bacula 2.0.3 > Damn, I should have read the subject line :-) > > 2007/9/5, Arno Lehmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED] >: > > Hi, > > No, this information is not stored on tape, but in the catalog. After > you change t

Re: [Bacula-users] Bug with Maximum Volume Jobs on bacula 2.0.3?!

Bacula 2.0.3 2007/9/5, Arno Lehmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Hi, > > No, this information is not stored on tape, but in the catalog. After > you change the pool definition, you have to manually update the > existing volume if you want this change to affect them. The pool > definition is merely a

Re: [Bacula-users] Bug with Maximum Volume Jobs on bacula 2.0.3?!

Hi, 05.09.2007 17:31,, Xeos Laenor wrote:: > I've noticed a strange behavior with "Maximum Volume Jobs" parameter. > I've set it to 3 at the volume initialization. > For the following backup on this volume, i change the parameter to 5 > (because I have 3 new servers to backup) > after few time i

[Bacula-users] Bug with Maximum Volume Jobs on bacula 2.0.3?!

I've noticed a strange behavior with "Maximum Volume Jobs" parameter. I've set it to 3 at the volume initialization. For the following backup on this volume, i change the parameter to 5 (because I have 3 new servers to backup) after few time i have this error : 05-sep 15:18 vel-bck-1-sd: papi-mgc-

Re: [Bacula-users] bug in restore function?

Hi, On 6/14/2007 11:37 AM, Rogier wrote: > Hi bacula users, > > Im setting up a bacula configuration. While testing the restore of one file i > get errors. I looks like a bug to mee but may be i am missing something. > > I've configured 2 Storage devices of the type File Use different file typ

[Bacula-users] bug in restore function?

Hi bacula users, Im setting up a bacula configuration. While testing the restore of one file i get errors. I looks like a bug to mee but may be i am missing something. I've configured 2 Storage devices of the type File in which I backup 2 different FIleSets. Backup works fine. The complete rest

Re: [Bacula-users] Bug when launching subscribe/unsubscribe URL.

Hi, On 6/8/2007 10:57 AM, Erik P. Olsen wrote: > When I launch https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users in > order > to change my preferences I run into a Mailman 2.1.8 bug. To whome should I > report this bug? Might be best reported to the sourfeforge folks. I just verified t

[Bacula-users] Bug when launching subscribe/unsubscribe URL.

When I launch https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users in order to change my preferences I run into a Mailman 2.1.8 bug. To whome should I report this bug? -- Erik P. Olsen, MSc Solsortvej 30, DK-2000 Frederiksberg, Denmark Phone: +45 38346480, Fax: +45 32106480, Mobil: +45 40

[Bacula-users] bug 807, fix?

Hello, I was wondering if there was a fix for bug 807? I am encountering it, as it's bug posters are, and would post directly to the bugs database, but i don't think a msg like "I'm seeing this bug's behavior" as well would be productive. I have nothing new to add and heard there might be a

Re: [Bacula-users] Bug? It is possible to purge running jobs

Kern Sibbald schrieb: > On Sunday 04 February 2007 13:05, Pierre Bernhardt wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I've seen some minutes ago that purging running jobs >> is possible. The job will finish with error message: >> >> starflake_test.2007-02-04_09.43.30 Warning: Error getting job record for >> stats: sql

Re: [Bacula-users] Bug? It is possible to purge running jobs

Kern Sibbald schrieb: > > On Sunday 04 February 2007 13:05, Pierre Bernhardt wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> >> >> I've seen some minutes ago that purging running jobs >> >> is possible. The job will finish with error message: >> >> >> >> starflake_test.2007-02-04_09.43.30 Warning: Error getting job reco

Re: [Bacula-users] Bug? It is possible to purge running jobs

On Sunday 04 February 2007 13:05, Pierre Bernhardt wrote: > Hello, > > I've seen some minutes ago that purging running jobs > is possible. The job will finish with error message: > > starflake_test.2007-02-04_09.43.30 Warning: Error getting job record for > stats: sql_get.c:293 No Job found for Job

[Bacula-users] Bug? It is possible to purge running jobs

Hello, I've seen some minutes ago that purging running jobs is possible. The job will finish with error message: starflake_test.2007-02-04_09.43.30 Warning: Error getting job record for stats: sql_get.c:293 No Job found for JobId 7 Possible a bug or a feature ;-) MfG... Pierre Bernhardt -

Re: [Bacula-users] Bug - Bacula 2.0 and Debian Sarge 3.1

On Tue, 9 Jan 2007, Jeremy C. Reed wrote: > Can't you just configure with --pid-dir= to point to your choice and then It sounds right if you read it out loud but I meant: --with-pid-dir :) - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influ

Re: [Bacula-users] Bug - Bacula 2.0 and Debian Sarge 3.1

On Tue, 9 Jan 2007, Gavin Conway wrote: > A spool file I can understand as that's done at configuration time. The > /var/run directory though is operationally important to both the systems > monitoring of the process as well as to bacula itself. Or is this just > another area that no-one can be

Re: [Bacula-users] Bug - Bacula 2.0 and Debian Sarge 3.1

Kern Sibbald wrote: > Well, the Makefile "make install" doesn't create *all* directories you might > use. For example if you setup working directories or spooling directories, it > is up to you when using the manual procedure to ensure that the directories > exist. A spool file I can understand

[Bacula-users] Bug - Bacula 2.0 and Debian Sarge 3.1

Possible bug. Ran the configure, make, make install as expected. Configured the systems using the old configs (in-place upgrade). The director and file-daemon started first time. The storage daemon refused to start until I'd created a /var/run/bacula directory. Either I've missed a step or this

Re: [Bacula-users] Bug - Bacula 2.0 and Debian Sarge 3.1

Kern Sibbald wrote: > On Monday 08 January 2007 16:01, Gavin Conway wrote: > >> Richard Mortimer wrote: >> > FWIW José Luis Tallón uploaded Debian packages to Sourceforge earlier >> >>> today. http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=50727 >>> I am not sure if these are built

Re: [Bacula-users] Bug - Bacula 2.0 and Debian Sarge 3.1

On Monday 08 January 2007 16:01, Gavin Conway wrote: > Richard Mortimer wrote: > > FWIW José Luis Tallón uploaded Debian packages to Sourceforge earlier > > today. http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=50727 > > I am not sure if these are built against stable or testing but you ma

Re: [Bacula-users] Bug - Bacula 2.0 and Debian Sarge 3.1

On Mon, 08 Jan 2007 14:02:55 +, Gavin Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Possible bug. Ran the configure, make, make install as expected. > Configured the systems using the old configs (in-place upgrade). > > The director and file-daemon started first time. The storage daemon > refused to s

Re: [Bacula-users] Bug - Bacula 2.0 and Debian Sarge 3.1

Richard Mortimer wrote: > FWIW José Luis Tallón uploaded Debian packages to Sourceforge earlier > today. http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=50727 > I am not sure if these are built against stable or testing but you may > get better mileage out of them. Many thanks, as mentione

Re: [Bacula-users] Bug - Bacula 2.0 and Debian Sarge 3.1

Erich Prinz wrote: > Very Interesting. > > The docs show /var/run/bacula as one of the directories that must me > manually created prior to installing. What is interesting to me is you > had a working system prior to an in-place upgrade. Still think it's a bug? > > Erich I still see it as a

Re: [Bacula-users] Bug - Bacula 2.0 and Debian Sarge 3.1

On Mon, 2007-01-08 at 14:02 +, Gavin Conway wrote: > Possible bug. Ran the configure, make, make install as expected. > Configured the systems using the old configs (in-place upgrade). > Did you previously use the Debian packages or did you compile yourself? You should be aware that the Debia

Re: [Bacula-users] Bug - Bacula 2.0 and Debian Sarge 3.1

Very Interesting. The docs show /var/run/bacula as one of the directories that must me manually created prior to installing. What is interesting to me is you had a working system prior to an in-place upgrade. Still think it's a bug? Erich On Jan 8, 2007, at 8:02 AM, Gavin Conway wrote

[Bacula-users] Bug - Bacula 2.0 and Debian Sarge 3.1

Possible bug. Ran the configure, make, make install as expected. Configured the systems using the old configs (in-place upgrade). The director and file-daemon started first time. The storage daemon refused to start until I'd created a /var/run/bacula directory. Either I've missed a step or this

Re: [Bacula-users] BUG?: BackupCatalog waiting to reserve a device

Hello, Please always copy the email list. On Monday 08 January 2007 10:32, Chris Rodgers wrote: > > It appears that you have a rather unique case, since many other users > > including myself rely on Bacula continuing when a client cannot be contacted. > > It wouldn't surprise me. I guess that

Re: [Bacula-users] BUG?: BackupCatalog waiting to reserve a device

On Monday 08 January 2007 10:10, Chris Rodgers wrote: > To my mind, the correct behaviour would be for the director to terminate > the job after FDConnectTimeout has elapsed and then to inform the > storage daemon that the job has been cancelled / had an error. At the > moment, it l

Re: [Bacula-users] BUG?: BackupCatalog waiting to reserve a device

To my mind, the correct behaviour would be for the director to terminate the job after FDConnectTimeout has elapsed and then to inform the storage daemon that the job has been cancelled / had an error. At the moment, it looks like the director cancels the job but leaves the stor

Re: [Bacula-users] BUG?: BackupCatalog waiting to reserve a device

To my mind, the correct behaviour would be for the director to terminate the job after FDConnectTimeout has elapsed and then to inform the storage daemon that the job has been cancelled / had an error. At the moment, it looks like the director cancels the job but leaves the stor

Re: [Bacula-users] BUG?: BackupCatalog waiting to reserve a device

Hi, On 1/5/2007 12:09 AM, Chris Rodgers wrote: >>>To my mind, the correct behaviour would be for the director to terminate >>>the job after FDConnectTimeout has elapsed and then to inform the >>>storage daemon that the job has been cancelled / had an error. At the >>>moment, it looks like the dire

Re: [Bacula-users] BUG?: BackupCatalog waiting to reserve a device

>> To my mind, the correct behaviour would be for the director to terminate >> the job after FDConnectTimeout has elapsed and then to inform the >> storage daemon that the job has been cancelled / had an error. At the >> moment, it looks like the director cancels the job but leaves the >> storage d

Re: [Bacula-users] BUG?: BackupCatalog waiting to reserve a device

Alan is correct, you don't want the catalog backup occurring when other client jobs are running. You can setup the job (as Alan noted) to run after all other jobs have completed -- the stock configuration is set up this way out of the oven. I get this same message if there are still jobs ru

Re: [Bacula-users] BUG?: BackupCatalog waiting to reserve a device

On Thu, 4 Jan 2007, Chris Rodgers wrote: >> You need to add a RunBeforeJob which will exit with an error if >> ngorongoro is not online. Ther ewas some discussion on this in the past >> relating to laptops and there may already be a script for it somewhere. > > This sounds like a bacula bug to me.

  1   2   >