> Hi Everyone,
>
> I just wanted to reply with a thank you to everyone who posted
> ideas. It was definitely a database problem, and I think it was the
> attribute spooling which ended up fixing it. I added Heitor's DB tuning
> instructions; used mysqlcheck -m/-o on my DB; and then added "Spoo
Hi Everyone,
I just wanted to reply with a thank you to everyone who posted
ideas. It was definitely a database problem, and I think it was the
attribute spooling which ended up fixing it. I added Heitor's DB tuning
instructions; used mysqlcheck -m/-o on my DB; and then added "Spool
Attri
Never mind. Just reread your previous email, and realized you said that
bacula was 20-25x slower than rsync. So definitely look at the DB
tunings, especially if your DB is very large.
Lloyd Brown
Systems Administrator
Fulton Supercomputing Lab
Brigham Young University
http://marylou.byu.edu
O
Not an expert, but it seems like you need to determine whether the
problem is with bacula, or something underlying.
Even if it's just a quick test, I would copy a large file to the
destination, and time it, to figure out if the non-bacula transfer speed
is consistent with the bacula backup jobs or
On 5/22/2015 5:28 AM, Charles Tassell wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm using external USB drives setup with the vchanger system to
> simulate a tape library, and I've got a problem where the backups are
> running horrendously slow. IE, the full backup of my small server
> (5.5GB) takes 8 hours and 10
On 2015-05-22 04:28, Charles Tassell wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm using external USB drives setup with the vchanger system to
> simulate a tape library, and I've got a problem where the backups are
> running horrendously slow.
...
> backups take 20-25x longer than with rsync...
I would say TLER on
> I'm using external USB drives setup with the vchanger system to
> simulate a tape library, and I've got a problem where the backups are
> running horrendously slow. IE, the full backup of my small server
> (5.5GB) takes 8 hours and 10 minutes, and the backup of my 690GB file
> server takes 5
Hello,
I'm using external USB drives setup with the vchanger system to
simulate a tape library, and I've got a problem where the backups are
running horrendously slow. IE, the full backup of my small server
(5.5GB) takes 8 hours and 10 minutes, and the backup of my 690GB file
server takes
On 12/27/2013 5:14 PM, Levie, Jim
wrote:
On Dec 27, 2013, at 11:01 AM, Josh Fisher wrote:
On 12/20/2013 7:10 PM, Levie, Jim wrote:
I have a group of three CentoOS 5.10
boxes and client back
On Dec 27, 2013, at 11:01 AM, Josh Fisher wrote:
On 12/20/2013 7:10 PM, Levie, Jim wrote:
I have a group of three CentoOS 5.10 boxes and client backups are, well, slow.
The hardware specs are that the systems are all Dell R710's (dual quad
processors w/24GB of memory). The Bacula server/storage
On 12/20/2013 7:10 PM, Levie, Jim wrote:
> I have a group of three CentoOS 5.10 boxes and client backups are, well,
> slow. The hardware specs are that the systems are all Dell R710's (dual quad
> processors w/24GB of memory). The Bacula server/storage node has a Dell LT04
> Powervault 124T and
I have a group of three CentoOS 5.10 boxes and client backups are, well, slow.
The hardware specs are that the systems are all Dell R710's (dual quad
processors w/24GB of memory). The Bacula server/storage node has a Dell LT04
Powervault 124T and is an authentication only server (LDAP) for a sma
Hey Martin,
Thanks for taking the time to read my problems. It's much appreciated.
src/config.h reports
#define USE_BATCH_FILE_INSERT 1
#define HAVE_THREAD_SAFE_MYSQL 1
I also turned on general logging on MySQL to see what queries were
coming across and it's inserting everything into the batch t
> On Tue, 29 May 2012 18:01:35 -0400, Greg Neujahr said:
>
> I also did not originally have '--enable-batch-insert' in the
> configure options, as it supposedly defaulted to 'yes'. I recompiled
> to enable it, just for testing.
Batch insert might be off if configure thinks that the MySQL can'
Hey Folks,
I run a few slackware boxes and recently (read: about a month ago)
upgraded the mysql server and client libraries on my installs.
Sometime after that point, the full backups I was performing on these
three boxes started to take 5-6 hours a piece, as opposed to the 30-40
minutes it was p
> Hello,
>
> So i am trying to back up my file server with Bacula and i am
having
> a difficult time getting it to work. I am able to back up desktops at
> 7MB/s, non-virtualized windows servers at 4.7MB/s, virtualized
> desktops at 4.7MB/s and virtualized windows servers at 100KB/s.??
>
Hello,
So i am trying to back up my file server with Bacula and i am having
a difficult time getting it to work. I am able to back up desktops at
7MB/s, non-virtualized windows servers at 4.7MB/s, virtualized
desktops at 4.7MB/s and virtualized windows servers at 100KB/s.??
On 9/20/07, Kyle Marsh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Howdy, all. I've noticed that my backups are running ridiculously
> slow and after watching the lists it seems that the solution was to
> update to 2.2.x, as there is much improved database insertion in the
> current release. After doing the upd
Thanks a bundle, Troy, you definitely gave me plenty to start with.
> I suspect the list guru's probably will want more info as this output
> doesn't give any real indication of where the problem might lie.
I suspect you're right.
> For starters, I'd provide the output from a completed full job.
Hi there,
>
> Let me know if you need more information.
>
I suspect the list guru's probably will want more info as this output
doesn't give any real indication of where the problem might lie.
For starters, I'd provide the output from a completed full job.
The output you provided is for an in
Howdy, all. I've noticed that my backups are running ridiculously
slow and after watching the lists it seems that the solution was to
update to 2.2.x, as there is much improved database insertion in the
current release. After doing the update on both my client and
director, I don't see any notabl
Hi,
Arunav Mandal wrote:
On Friday 09 September 2005 09:55, you wrote:
Hi,
Arunav Mandal wrote:
The director is running on xeon 2.8Ghz having 4GB of RAM on Hardware
Raid0 and the storage demaon is on dual P4 3Ghz having 1GB ram and 1TB
disk spool(xfs) also on Hardware Raid0. Most of client
sion Time:1126100490
> > Last Volume Bytes: 154,989,306,412
> > Non-fatal FD errors:0
> > SD Errors: 0
> > FD termination status: OK
> > SD termination status: OK
> > Termination:Backup OK
> >
> &
90
> > Last Volume Bytes: 154,989,306,412
> > Non-fatal FD errors:0
> > SD Errors: 0
> > FD termination status: OK
> > SD termination status: OK
> > Termination:Backup OK
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > -
0
> FD termination status: OK
> SD termination status: OK
> Termination:Backup OK
>
>
>
>
> - Original Message -----
> From: "Arno Lehmann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Arunav Mandal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc:
&g
On Thursday 08 September 2005 19:45, Arunav Mandal wrote:
> I am running 1.36.3 on both director and storage deamon and diff. versions
> on 150 clients. Recently I started spooling to disk first then to tape with
> around 100 concurrent connections for director and storage deamons.
Gee, you are r
tion:Backup OK
- Original Message - From: "Arno Lehmann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Arunav Mandal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2005 9:09 PM
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Slow backups
Hi,
Arunav Mandal wrote:
I am
age -
From: "Arno Lehmann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Arunav Mandal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2005 9:09 PM
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Slow backups
Hi,
Arunav Mandal wrote:
I am running 1.36.3 on both director and storage deamon a
Hi,
Arunav Mandal wrote:
I am running 1.36.3 on both director and storage deamon and diff.
versions on 150 clients. Recently I started spooling to disk first then
to tape with around 100 concurrent connections for director and storage
deamons. Now the backups seems to take time Rate seems to
I am running 1.36.3 on both director and storage deamon and diff. versions
on 150 clients. Recently I started spooling to disk first then to tape with
around 100 concurrent connections for director and storage deamons. Now the
backups seems to take time Rate seems to be around 700KB/s before spo
30 matches
Mail list logo
