On Tue, 9 Jan 2007, Jeremy C. Reed wrote:
> Can't you just configure with --pid-dir= to point to your choice and then
It sounds right if you read it out loud but I meant:
--with-pid-dir
:)
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influ
On Tue, 9 Jan 2007, Gavin Conway wrote:
> A spool file I can understand as that's done at configuration time. The
> /var/run directory though is operationally important to both the systems
> monitoring of the process as well as to bacula itself. Or is this just
> another area that no-one can be
Kern Sibbald wrote:
> Well, the Makefile "make install" doesn't create *all* directories you might
> use. For example if you setup working directories or spooling directories, it
> is up to you when using the manual procedure to ensure that the directories
> exist.
A spool file I can understand
Possible bug. Ran the configure, make, make install as expected.
Configured the systems using the old configs (in-place upgrade).
The director and file-daemon started first time. The storage daemon
refused to start until I'd created a /var/run/bacula directory.
Either I've missed a step or this
Kern Sibbald wrote:
> On Monday 08 January 2007 16:01, Gavin Conway wrote:
>
>> Richard Mortimer wrote:
>> > FWIW José Luis Tallón uploaded Debian packages to Sourceforge earlier
>>
>>> today. http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=50727
>>> I am not sure if these are built
On Monday 08 January 2007 16:01, Gavin Conway wrote:
> Richard Mortimer wrote:
> > FWIW José Luis Tallón uploaded Debian packages to Sourceforge earlier
> > today. http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=50727
> > I am not sure if these are built against stable or testing but you ma
On Mon, 08 Jan 2007 14:02:55 +, Gavin Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Possible bug. Ran the configure, make, make install as expected.
> Configured the systems using the old configs (in-place upgrade).
>
> The director and file-daemon started first time. The storage daemon
> refused to s
Richard Mortimer wrote:
> FWIW José Luis Tallón uploaded Debian packages to Sourceforge earlier
> today. http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=50727
> I am not sure if these are built against stable or testing but you may
> get better mileage out of them.
Many thanks, as mentione
Erich Prinz wrote:
> Very Interesting.
>
> The docs show /var/run/bacula as one of the directories that must me
> manually created prior to installing. What is interesting to me is you
> had a working system prior to an in-place upgrade. Still think it's a bug?
>
> Erich
I still see it as a
On Mon, 2007-01-08 at 14:02 +, Gavin Conway wrote:
> Possible bug. Ran the configure, make, make install as expected.
> Configured the systems using the old configs (in-place upgrade).
>
Did you previously use the Debian packages or did you compile yourself?
You should be aware that the Debia
Very Interesting.
The docs show /var/run/bacula as one of the directories that must
me manually created prior to installing. What is interesting to me is
you had a working system prior to an in-place upgrade. Still think
it's a bug?
Erich
On Jan 8, 2007, at 8:02 AM, Gavin Conway wrote
Possible bug. Ran the configure, make, make install as expected.
Configured the systems using the old configs (in-place upgrade).
The director and file-daemon started first time. The storage daemon
refused to start until I'd created a /var/run/bacula directory.
Either I've missed a step or this
12 matches
Mail list logo
