On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 11:37:58PM +0100, Ana Emília M. Arruda wrote:
> Hello Uwe,
>
> Do you have concurrent jobs configured for this one-drive TL? It seems that
> when you issue the mount command the drive is busy with another job/volume.
> Have you checked this?
>
Hello Emilia,
we have confi
Hello Uwe,
Do you have concurrent jobs configured for this one-drive TL? It seems that
when you issue the mount command the drive is busy with another job/volume.
Have you checked this?
If this is the case, you can try to run a release command before the
mount/update slots scan commands.
Best re
On 08/12/15 14:36, Heitor Faria wrote:
>
> Uwe: if your tape library has a bar code header please use that for your own
> benefit. You can generate your own labels using some online free web services.
You can generate bar codes which most readers are happy with using a
Dymo or Brother laminated
On 08/12/15 16:40, Heitor Faria wrote:
>> I'll look into their usage further, in the meantime it would be nice
>> if bacula wouldn't lock up for days using the "acquire" dance ;)
You have to know why it's locked that way and that means turning up the
debug levels/looking at logs.
> Sorry Uwe: n
>> Uwe: if your tape library has a bar code header please use that for your own
>> benefit. You can generate your own labels using some online free web
>> services.
>> The "update slots scan" forces Bacula to insert each tape into your drive in
>> order to verify it's content, that's why you will
On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 12:36:57PM -0200, Heitor Faria wrote:
>
> Uwe: if your tape library has a bar code header please use that for your own
> benefit. You can generate your own labels using some online free web services.
> The "update slots scan" forces Bacula to insert each tape into your dr
>> Uwe: why do you use an update slots scan instead of a regular: update slots?
>> Don't you have bar codes on your tapes?
>>
>
> Yep, that's the reason: we're not using bar codes.
Uwe: if your tape library has a bar code header please use that for your own
benefit. You can generate your own la
On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 12:24:56PM -0200, Heitor Faria wrote:
> Uwe: why do you use an update slots scan instead of a regular: update slots?
> Don't you have bar codes on your tapes?
>
Yep, that's the reason: we're not using bar codes.
All the best, Uwe
-
>> I think your TL may be looking for a tape in an erratic way. Maybe
>> your Baculadrives configuration order does not match the physical
>> drives order. Maybe your TL is just crazy and need a power cycle. >
>> Verify the TL webconsole for error messages and also why can't it feed
>> the tape B
On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 09:50:30AM -0200, Heitor Faria wrote:
>
> I think your TL may be looking for a tape in an erratic way. Maybe
> your Baculadrives configuration order does not match the physical
> drives order. Maybe your TL is just crazy and need a power cycle. >
> Verify the TL webconsol
> Hi folks,
>
> every once in a while our bacula director hangs with the following
> error message:
>
> * mount storage=lto4 slot=5
> 3001 Device ""lto4" (/dev/nst0)" is doing acquire.
It's hardly an error. Tape is being initialized by your drive.
> * stat storage
>
>
> Used Volume status:
>
Hi folks,
every once in a while our bacula director hangs with the following
error message:
* mount storage=lto4 slot=5
3001 Device ""lto4" (/dev/nst0)" is doing acquire.
* stat storage
Used Volume status:
Reserved volume: OFFLINE08_18 on tape device "lto4" (/dev/nst0)
Reader=0 writers=0 r
12 matches
Mail list logo
