Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula Director 13.0.4 service fails— PostgreSQL Connection Failure

Did you upgrade any other software on the Director or PostgreSQL servers at the same time? Did you edit this output? Two things seem strange to me: 1) The "Could not open Catalog" error has database "bacula" but the "Unable to connect" error has Database=baculadb. 2) The user name in the Postgr

[Bacula-users] Bacula Director 13.0.4 service fails— PostgreSQL Connection Failure

Hi all, I recently upgraded my Bacula Director from version 9.x to 13.0.4 on a Debian 12 system. I successfully ran the update_postgresql_tables script against the PostgreSQL catalog, and Bacula Director started up without any issues. However, after starting a few backup jobs (typically around 8

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula or Drive problem?

Bill Arlofski via Bacula-users schrieb am 16.06.25 um 16:32: On 6/15/25 2:19 AM, Dr. Thorsten Brandau via Bacula-users wrote: As this surprisingly looked more like a changer, despite the error code=70, I changed the changer path in bacula-sd.conf to / dev//sg8 Then I ran a backup (catalogue

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula or Drive problem?

Udo Kaune schrieb am 15.06.25 um 12:21: Am 15.06.25 um 10:19 schrieb Dr. Thorsten Brandau via Bacula-users: Udo Kaune schrieb am 13.06.25 um 23:47: Hi Thorsten, Did you reboot the box recently and did by any chance your devices get reordered? What does lsscsi -g show and does that correspo

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula or Drive problem?

On 6/15/25 2:19 AM, Dr. Thorsten Brandau via Bacula-users wrote: As this surprisingly looked more like a changer, despite the error code=70, I changed the changer path in bacula-sd.conf to / dev//sg8 Then I ran a backup (catalogue to make it quick): *And to my surprise - the backup worked agai

[Bacula-users] Bacula or Drive problem?

Am 15.06.25 um 10:19 schrieb Dr. Thorsten Brandau via Bacula-users: Udo Kaune schrieb am 13.06.25 um 23:47: Hi Thorsten, Did you reboot the box recently and did by any chance your devices get reordered? What does lsscsi -g show and does that correspond to your bacula-sd.conf entries? Best r

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula or Drive problem?

Bill Arlofski via Bacula-users schrieb am 13.06.25 um 19:48: On 6/12/25 10:32 AM, Dr. Thorsten Brandau via Bacula-users wrote: Hi Bill thank you for your as always helpful insights. You are more than welcome, Thorsten. :) I was not aware of the conflict between the libraries and baculas

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula or Drive problem?

Bill Arlofski via Bacula-users schrieb am 13.06.25 um 19:48: On 6/12/25 10:32 AM, Dr. Thorsten Brandau via Bacula-users wrote: Hi Bill thank you for your as always helpful insights. You are more than welcome, Thorsten. :) I was not aware of the conflict between the libraries and baculas

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula or Drive problem?

Udo Kaune schrieb am 13.06.25 um 23:47: Hi Thorsten, Did you reboot the box recently and did by any chance your devices get reordered? What does lsscsi -g show and does that correspond to your bacula-sd.conf entries? Best regards, Udo Hi Udo, yes, I regularily reboot the system for main

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula or Drive problem?

Bill Arlofski via Bacula-users schrieb am 13.06.25 um 19:48: On 6/12/25 10:32 AM, Dr. Thorsten Brandau via Bacula-users wrote: Hi Bill thank you for your as always helpful insights. You are more than welcome, Thorsten. :) I was not aware of the conflict between the libraries and baculas

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula or Drive problem?

Hi Thorsten, Did you reboot the box recently and did by any chance your devices get reordered? What does lsscsi -g show and does that correspond to your bacula-sd.conf entries? Best regards, Udo smime.p7s Description: Kryptografische S/MIME-Signatur

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula or Drive problem?

On 6/12/25 10:32 AM, Dr. Thorsten Brandau via Bacula-users wrote: Hi Bill thank you for your as always helpful insights. You are more than welcome, Thorsten. :) I was not aware of the conflict between the libraries and baculas autoclean feature. Immediately I turned the one of the lib off

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula or Drive problem?

Bill Arlofski via Bacula-users schrieb am 12.06.25 um 18:03: On 6/12/25 1:43 AM, Dr. Thorsten Brandau via Bacula-users wrote: Hi I am using a Neo 24 Tape library with an LTO-9 drive. The old one (Tandberg) broke recently and was replaced with a different one. Then the backups with Bacula work

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula or Drive problem?

On 6/12/25 1:43 AM, Dr. Thorsten Brandau via Bacula-users wrote: Hi I am using a Neo 24 Tape library with an LTO-9 drive. The old one (Tandberg) broke recently and was replaced with a different one. Then the backups with Bacula worked fine for some time. Now I get those errors (again): 12-Jun

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula or Drive problem?

On 12/6/25 17:43, Dr. Thorsten Brandau via Bacula-users wrote: Hi I am using a Neo 24 Tape library with an LTO-9 drive. The old one (Tandberg) broke recently and was replaced with a different one. Then the backups with Bacula worked fine for some time. Now I get those errors (again): 12-Jun

[Bacula-users] Bacula or Drive problem?

Hi I am using a Neo 24 Tape library with an LTO-9 drive. The old one (Tandberg) broke recently and was replaced with a different one. Then the backups with Bacula worked fine for some time. Now I get those errors (again): 12-Jun 09:31 -dir JobId 1458: shell command: run BeforeJob "/usr/libe

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 13.0.4 Upgrade with Existing PostgreSQL Database - Version Error

Hello Martin, Thank you for pointing that out. It was that older version script. I ran the updated version script and I was able to upgrade postgresql db catagories. Sincerely, Saiful On Wed, May 21, 2025 at 4:28 PM Martin Simmons wrote: > Which version of bacula-director-pgsql do you have on

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula-web restore assistant : serching by windows root partition letters

users@lists.sourceforge.net Objet : Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula-web restore assistant : serching by windows root partition letters [Vous ne recevez pas souvent de courriers de ganius...@gmail.com. Découvrez pourquoi ceci est important à https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ] On Fri, 23 May 2025 at

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula-web restore assistant : serching by windows root partition letters

On Fri, 23 May 2025 at 15:01, Lionel PLASSE wrote: > >.bvfs_lsdirs jobid=12345 path=D:/ > >.bvfs_lsfiles jobid=12345 path=D:/ > > Unfortunately those two commands don't return any results (with a good jobid) > nor with path=D:/mydir Hello Lionel, For empty results from the command with path=D:

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula-web restore assistant : serching by windows root partition letters

dir -Message d'origine- De : Marcin Haba Envoyé : jeudi 22 mai 2025 20:27 À : Lionel PLASSE Cc : bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net Objet : Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula-web restore assistant : serching by windows root partition letters [Vous ne recevez pas souvent de courriers de ganius

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula-web restore assistant : serching by windows root partition letters

On Thu, 22 May 2025 at 13:43, Lionel PLASSE wrote: > > Hello, > > I notice, with my bacula-web restoration assistant, for the Windows file > group, that when I enter the prefix of the Windows partition alone, > it does not list the contents of D:/ for example, I have to specify D:/my_dir. > Befor

[Bacula-users] Bacula-web restore assistant : serching by windows root partition letters

Hello, I notice, with my bacula-web restoration assistant, for the Windows file group, that when I enter the prefix of the Windows partition alone, it does not list the contents of D:/ for example, I have to specify D:/my_dir. Before, if I typed D:/ it would give me the contents of the subfolde

Re: [Bacula-users] bacula-fd Instances Timing Out on `status client`, despite Running Jobs

Interesting.  I remember being confused about which `Maximum Concurrent Jobs` to use (the `bacula-fd.conf` vs the director's config), but your explanation makes a lot of sense.  I hadn't realized/considered the implications of having it set too low in the FD's config. I'll test it and if the p

Re: [Bacula-users] bacula-fd Instances Timing Out on `status client`, despite Running Jobs

On 5/20/25 3:20 PM, Lloyd Brown wrote: Hi all, I'm running into an issue with some bacula-fd instances and hoping someone can point me in the right direction. In short: I have bacula-fd instances that are clearly running jobs (confirmed via strace), but they often time out when I run status c

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 13.0.4 Upgrade with Existing PostgreSQL Database - Version Error

Which version of bacula-director-pgsql do you have on the PostgreSQL server? You need 13.0.4. This line in your output shows that /usr/share/bacula-director/update_postgresql_tables is from an older version (probably 9.x.y): > This script can only update an existing version 12-15 database to vers

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 13.0.4 Upgrade with Existing PostgreSQL Database - Version Error

Hi Martin, I tried to run it from the postgresql database. But I got the following error: sudo -u postgres /usr/share/bacula-director/update_postgresql_tables -U baculadev -d baculadev -h localhost This script will update a Bacula PostgreSQL database from version 12-15 to 16 Depending on the c

[Bacula-users] bacula-fd Instances Timing Out on `status client`, despite Running Jobs

Hi all, I'm running into an issue with some bacula-fd instances and hoping someone can point me in the right direction. In short: I have bacula-fd instances that are clearly running jobs (confirmed via strace), but they often time out when I run status client=CLIENTNAME. They only seem relia

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 13.0.4 Upgrade with Existing PostgreSQL Database - Version Error

Hi Saiful, You can probably run it from the PostgreSQL server. You will have to look at the update_bacula_tables and update_postgresql_tables scripts installed on the PostgreSQL server to ensure that the db_name variable is set to bacula_dev. To be safe, make a backup of the bacula_prod database

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 13.0.4 Upgrade with Existing PostgreSQL Database - Version Error

Hi Martin, Thanks for your reply. Could you please advise on the correct way to upgrade the bacula_dev database schema in this situation? Specifically, What is the exact command I should use with update_bacula_tables to target the bacula_dev database? I installed the bacula-director package in m

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 13.0.4 Upgrade with Existing PostgreSQL Database - Version Error

Yes, you need to run update_bacula_tables as root. Any arguments will be passed to psql for the password etc (but not the database name). update_bacula_tables just invokes update_postgresql_tables and you can check the db_name variable in that script to see which database it will update. If you

[Bacula-users] Bacula 13.0.4 Upgrade with Existing PostgreSQL Database - Version Error

Hello community, I'm upgrading my Bacula Director from 9.4.2 to 13.0.4 on Ubuntu 24.04. My PostgreSQL database (version 12) is located on a separate server (Ubuntu 20.04). This PostgreSQL server hosts two Bacula catalog databases: bacula_prod: My production 9.4.2 catalog (which I want to keep

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula on Fedora/SELinux

execute } for >>> pid=10420 comm="cleanup" name="dnf5" dev="sda3" ino=1158689 sco >>> ntext=system_u:system_r:bacula_t:s0 >>> tcontext=system_u:object_r:rpm_exec_t:s0 tclass=file permissive=0 >>> type=AVC msg=audit(1746922631.466:1345): avc: denied { execute } for

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula on Fedora/SELinux

journalctl_exec_t:s0 tclass=file permissive=0 > type=AVC msg=audit(1746922631.466:1347): avc: denied { execute } for > pid=10421 comm="cleanup" name="journalctl" dev="sda3" ino=11533 > 46 scontext=system_u:system_r:bacula_t:s0 > tcontext=system_u:object_r:journalctl_exec_t:s0 tc

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula on Fedora/SELinux

2631.466:1346): avc: denied { execute } for >> pid=10421 comm="cleanup" name="journalctl" dev="sda3" ino=11533 >> 46 scontext=system_u:system_r:bacula_t:s0 >> tcontext=system_u:object_r:journalctl_exec_t:s0 tclass=file permissive=0 >> type=AVC msg=audit(1746922631.466:1347): avc: denied { execute } for >> pid=10421 comm="cleanup" name="journalctl" dev="sda3" ino=11533 >> 46 scontext=system_u:system_r:bacula_t:s0 >> tcontext=system_u:object_r:journalctl_exec_t:s0 tclass=file permissive=0 >> type=AVC msg=audit(1746922631.468:1348): avc: denied { getattr } for >> pid=10422 comm="find" name="/" dev="tmpfs" ino=1 scontext=syste >> m_u:system_r:bacula_t:s0 tcontext=system_u:object_r:tmpfs_t:s0 >> tclass=filesystem permissive=0 >> >> ___ >> Bacula-users mailing list >> Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users >> > ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

[Bacula-users] Bacula on Fedora/SELinux

Hello everyone, I'm not a Linuix expert and need some help. I'm adding a new server to my little home LAN based on Ubuntu, with Bacula running without problems. I'm keeping all software packages on the most up-to-date versions. This new server is adding Fedora/SELinux (plus FreeIPA and QEMU/Libvi

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 9.4 and 9.6 compatibility...

Mandi! Sven Hartge In chel di` si favelave... > The "live" backports repository is disabled and archived for any release > that is moved to the LTS stage, so no wonder you could not find anything > on there. Thanks for the info. Anyway, for a sake of completeness, at the end i've simply put

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 9.4 and 9.6 compatibility...

On 26.04.25 09:58, Marco Gaiarin wrote: Mandi! Sven Hartge In chel di` si favelave... There was a Debian-Backports package for Buster for 9.6.7, availabe still via https://snapshot.debian.org/package/bacula/9.6.7-3~bpo10%2B1/#bacula-sd_9.6.7-3:7e:bpo10:2b:1 That will install cleanly without

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 9.4 and 9.6 compatibility...

Mandi! Martin Simmons In chel di` si favelave... > In general, you need the versions of the director and storage to be the same. > Anything else is untested. OK. Because of 'catalog datbase format remains unchanged' i hoped that DIR<->SD compatibility could/would be a 'major version only' thing

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 9.4 and 9.6 compatibility...

Mandi! Sven Hartge In chel di` si favelave... > There was a Debian-Backports package for Buster for 9.6.7, availabe still via > https://snapshot.debian.org/package/bacula/9.6.7-3~bpo10%2B1/#bacula-sd_9.6.7-3:7e:bpo10:2b:1 > That will install cleanly without the need for manual compilation. Uh!

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 9.4 and 9.6 compatibility...

On 25.04.25 20:39, Martin Simmons wrote: I think your simplest option is to build Bacula 9.6.7 yourself on the buster machines so you can upgrade all machines to that version before doing any OS upgrades. There was a Debian-Backports package for Buster for 9.6.7, availabe still via https://s

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 9.4 and 9.6 compatibility...

t; > > So, can i upgrade director to 9.6, and smoothly upgrade storages to 9.6, one > by one, still using 9.4 storages? > > > Thanks. > > -- > > > > > ___ > Bacu

[Bacula-users] Bacula 9.4 and 9.6 compatibility...

I need to do a rather complex server upgrade, from debian buster to debian bookworm (really: from PVE 6 to PVE 8). Buster have bacula 9.4.2, bullseye and bookworm have 9.6.7. Looking at bacula 9.6 release notes i catch: The catalog datbase format remains unchanged from the 9.4.4 relea

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula + Zimbra: Run Before Backup

On 3/20/25 3:56 AM, Bruno Bartels (Intero Technologies) wrote: Hi Bill, thank you very much for your detailed answer. Reading the details from your answer, everythings seems convincingly. I have discussed the issue yesterday with an other admin/devops. I think I've stressed out the wrong poin

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula + Zimbra: Run Before Backup

t the whole backup because it generates Load on the Zimbra Server and users are working with Zimbra). Thank you very much! Bruno -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Bill An: bacula-users Datum: Donnerstag, 20. März 2025 00:41 CET Betreff: Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula + Zimbra: Run Before Backup On

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula + Zimbra: Run Before Backup

On 3/19/25 5:08 AM, Bruno Bartels \(Intero Technologies\) via Bacula-users wrote: Hi all, I am fiddeling with a problem. I am trying to set things up like mentioned here: https://www.bacula.lat/zimbra-network-edition-backup-with-bacula/?lang=en

[Bacula-users] Bacula + Zimbra: Run Before Backup

  Hi all,   I am fiddeling with a problem. I am trying to set things up like mentioned here: https://www.bacula.lat/zimbra-network-edition-backup-with-bacula/?lang=en   This means: Bacula (Dir, SD) runs on one server, Zimbra (and bacula-fd) runs on annother server.   Backup on Zimbra-Se

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula cloud

I've been thinking and the conclusion I reached is that it's generally understandable that bacula doesn't fail backup or copy jobs that have failed part uploads. It's also understandable that bacula wouldn't 'fail' an admin job if the admin job ran into trouble in its script. After all, how should

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula cloud

Bill, Awesome. I'll check it out tomorrow. Regards, Robert Gerber 402-237-8692 r...@craeon.net On Sun, Feb 23, 2025 at 1:38 PM Bill Arlofski wrote: > @Rob Gerber, all... > > I have just pushed a new feature which will notify on Cloud jobs with > cloud part transfer errors. > > If there are cl

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula cloud

@Rob Gerber, all... I have just pushed a new feature which will notify on Cloud jobs with cloud part transfer errors. If there are cloud jobs that have part transfer errors, a new banner line will be at the top of the report above the job table telling you how many jobs had cloud transfer erro

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula cloud

This is the script I use in a run after clause in the cloud backup job. This does all cloud volumes without bothering to check what went and what didn't. Most of the time it does nothing, just resending parts when there is an upload error. #!/bin/bash #upload to cloud sleep 10 #wait 10secs echo "c

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula cloud

replies inline below. A lot of things can affect reliability, and who knows, maybe there are > intermittent issues during backup jobs and cloud > volume part uploads which are out of your control causing some parts to > fail to be uploaded during the backup job itself, but > those issues do not

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula cloud

has not terminated normally, which includes any running job of the same > name. Cannot allow duplicate queued jobs. > RescheduleOnError = no > Accurate = yes > } > > sd config: > Device { > Name = "B2-TGU-Full-001" # there are 5 more like this one > Description = "B2-TG

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula cloud

On Sat, 22 Feb 2025 at 18:01, Rob Gerber wrote: >> What error message did you experience with Amazon driver? > > I saw errors like this: > > 22-Feb 10:28 td-bacula-sd JobId 97: Error: B2-TGU-Inc-0048/part.1 > state=error retry=10/10 size=263 B duration=56s > msg=/opt/bacula/plugins/aws_clo

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula cloud

Replies inline below. Regards, Robert Gerber 402-237-8692 r...@craeon.net On Thu, Feb 20, 2025 at 8:40 PM Marcin Haba wrote: > On Fri, 21 Feb 2025 at 03:21, Rob Gerber wrote: > > I'm using the s3 driver instead of the amazon driver. I read that the > new amazon driver is much better than the s

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula cloud

On 2/20/25 7:40 PM, Marcin Haba wrote: Hello Rob, What error message did you experience with Amazon driver? For Amazon driver and non-AWS S3 cloud storage in the Cloud configuration resource you need to define the BlobEndpoint directive. Otherwise it will not work. @Rob right on schedule, Marc

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula cloud

On 2/20/25 7:19 PM, Rob Gerber wrote: > Hello, [...snip...] Some parts are failing to upload. I verified with ls that the parts in question still remain on disk (I have set cloud cache to truncate on upload, so only part1 and parts that haven't uploaded should remain). In bconsole I ran 'clou

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula cloud

On Fri, 21 Feb 2025 at 03:21, Rob Gerber wrote: > I'm using the s3 driver instead of the amazon driver. I read that the new > amazon driver is much better than the s3 driver, but in my testing the amazon > driver didn't seem to want to connect to a non-aws server. Hello Rob, What error message

[Bacula-users] Bacula cloud

Hello, Bacula 15.0.2 running on Rocky linux 9.4. I'm setting up a system that I will eventually deploy for a customer. This system is currently in the testing phase and nothing on it matters - yet. I have a set of jobs and resources that write to local file volumes. After the local backup jobs are

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula - Backup's of LUKS Fully encrypted Disks

backups onto the local machine for me to move to a remote backup location. Regards, Jonathan Aquilina From: Udo Kaune Sent: 27 January 2025 16:47 To: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula - Backup's of LUKS Fully encrypted Disks Am 25.01.25 um 07:16 schrieb Jon

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula - Backup's of LUKS Fully encrypted Disks

Am 25.01.25 um 07:16 schrieb Jonathan Aquilina via Bacula-users: Good Morning, Is it possible to use bacula to backup fully encrypted disks that are encrypted with LUKS? Regards, Jonathan Aquilina It's a bit unclear, what you want to accomplish. If you LUKS drive is mounted, the data on

[Bacula-users] Bacula - Backup's of LUKS Fully encrypted Disks

Good Morning, Is it possible to use bacula to backup fully encrypted disks that are encrypted with LUKS? Regards, Jonathan Aquilina ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-us

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula Backup Problem

On 1/15/25 7:25 AM, Gina Costa wrote: Hi, I´m using Bacula 9.6.5, and I ran a backup in a WIndows Client. The client´s status is OK, the job ran wtihout any error (as shown in job´s log), but when I try to do a recover  the backup is empty. I don´t understand what is happening? I also attac

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula Backup Problem

Id 12877: Recycled volume "bckSrv_5609" on File device >> "storage-BP3_SRV" (/backupBP3), all previous data lost. >> bacula-dir JobId 12877: Using Device "storage-BP3_SRV" to write. >> bacula-dir JobId 12877: Recycled volume "bckSrv_5609" >> bacula-dir JobId 12877: All records pruned from Volume "bckSrv_5609"; >> marking it "Purged" >> bacula-dir JobId 12877: There are no more Jobs associated with Volume >> "bckSrv_5609". Marking it purged. >> bacula-dir JobId 12877: Start Backup JobId 12877, >> Job=job_SAP-content-prod.2025-01-15_10.10.42_38 >> >> -- >> >> Com os melhores cumprimentos, >> *Gina Costa* >> >> Universidade de Coimbra • Administração >> SGSIIC – Serviço de Gestão de Sistemas e Infraestruturas de Informação e >> Comunicação >> NCS@UC - Núcleo de Cibersegurança >> Rua do Arco da Traição | 3000-056 COIMBRA • PORTUGAL >> Tel.: +351 239 247 070 >> E-mail:gina.co...@uc.pt >> ___ >> Bacula-users mailing list >> Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users >> > ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

[Bacula-users] Bacula Backup Problem

Hi, I´m using Bacula 9.6.5, and I ran a backup in a WIndows Client. The client´s status is OK, the job ran wtihout any error (as shown in job´s log), but when I try to do a recover  the backup is empty. I don´t understand what is happening? I also attach a screnshot of the resotore. Thanks

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula Backup Problem

me "bckSrv_5609" > bacula-dir JobId 12877: All records pruned from Volume "bckSrv_5609"; > marking it "Purged" > bacula-dir JobId 12877: There are no more Jobs associated with Volume > "bckSrv_5609". Marking it purged. > bacula-dir JobId

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula-Web won't play nice.

b_port'] = '5432'; > > > > -- > > > > I get this: (abbreviated) > > > > ------ > > > > 200~Bacula-Web logo Bacula-Web > > Oops, it looks like

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula-Web won't play nice.

; File: /var/www/html/bacula-web/core/Db/Database.php on line 81 in function PDO->__construct File: /var/www/html/bacula-web/core/Db/DatabaseFactory.php on line 36 in function Core\Db\Database->__construct File: /var/www/html/bacula-web/application/

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula: Backup Fatal Error of Client:pi-fd Fileset:docs Incremental

t; Volume name(s): > Volume Session Id: 563 > Volume Session Time:1725763550 > Last Volume Bytes: 0 (0 B) > Non-fatal FD errors:1 > SD Errors: 1 > FD termination status: Error > SD termination status: Error > Termination:*** Backup Error *** > > -Chris Wilkinson > ___ > Bacula-users mailing list > Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net <mailto:Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users > <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users> ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula-Web won't play nice.

thing went wrong somehow :( > Database error > SQLSTATE[08006] [7] FATAL: Ident authentication failed for user "bacula" > File: /var/www/html/bacula-web/core/Db/Database.php on line 81 in > function PDO->__construct > File: /var/www/html/bacula-web/core/Db/DatabaseFactory.php on line 36 in > function Co

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula-Web won't play nice.

Hi Daniel, Am 27.11.2024 um 21:43 schrieb White, Daniel E. (GSFC-764.0)[AEGIS] via Bacula-users: ... about bacula-web, which I have not looked at for a *very* long time. But: 200~Bacula-Web logo Bacula-Web Oops, it looks like something went wrong somehow :( Database error SQLSTATE[0800

[Bacula-users] Bacula-Web won't play nice.

Community Bacula 15.0.2 on RHEL 9 from https://www.bacula.org/packages//rpms/15.0.2/el9/x86_64/ Bacula-web installed with Composer I set up "authentication": -- sudo -u apache php bwc setupauth It's now time to setup the application back-end databas

Re: [Bacula-users] bacula install pages are not working

Thanks Amo I had the install steps documenred for myself, so i am good, i try sending them a mail cheers On 2024-11-25 23:13, Arno Lehmann via Bacula-users wrote: Hi, Am 25.11.2024 um 15:10 schrieb Mehrdad Ravanbod: Hi guys bacula install pages for the community edition(actualy the whole

Re: [Bacula-users] bacula install pages are not working

Hi, Am 25.11.2024 um 15:10 schrieb Mehrdad Ravanbod: Hi guys bacula install pages for the community edition(actualy the whole site) at Bacula.lat bacula.lat is the turf of a company in Brazil (mostly) and the operators are not very active here. I would suggest reaching out via mail: cont.

[Bacula-users] bacula install pages are not working

Hi guys bacula install pages for the community edition(actualy the whole site) at Bacula.lat is gone haywire, links go tp some wierd forum page, any chance of getting this fixed or a backup page? -- Ampfield Aktiebolag Mehrdad Ravanbod

[Bacula-users] Bacula-Web 9.7.0 release

Hello, Long time I haven’t written here … I'm pleased to inform you that Bacula-Web 9.7.0 is now available. This release mainly focus on fixing / updating the documentation, It also include several bug fixes. The official documentation is now available from https://www.bacula-web.org/docs/ As

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula-15.x packages for Fedora (workstation)

Am 15.10.24 um 15:06 schrieb Dragan Milivojević: RH is a bit conservative, especially when it comes to server software that is not that widely used. In this case it was a good decision since the latest Bacula breaks the backups if you use accurate mode with pino5 settings. Anyway you can use copr

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula-15.x packages for Fedora (workstation)

sts.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

[Bacula-users] Bacula-15.x packages for Fedora (workstation)

In the repos I have registered to I find debs and rpms, but not built specifically for Fedora (40). Are there newer packages for Fedora than the 13.0.4 packages that come from Fedora itself? It surprises me that a distro that is known for being rather on the edge does not provide the latest

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 15.0.2 - Windows Clients name-fd.trace File Grows Extremely Fast

Hello, thanks for the report, I have uploaded a new version of the binary on bacula.org without the trace problem. It's called 15.0.2-3. The previous one is no longer on the main page. Best Regards, Eric On 9/21/24 00:15, Arno Lehmann wrote: Hi Derek, Am 20.09.2024 um 20:37 schrieb Derek Babl

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 15.0.2 - Windows Clients name-fd.trace File Grows Extremely Fast

Hi Derek, Am 20.09.2024 um 20:37 schrieb Derek Bable: Hi All, I am having a strange issue regarding Bacula 15.0.2 on Windows Clients. Clients were installed using the Bacula 15.0.2 Binaries from bacula.org. We noticed that the C:\Program Files\Bacula\working\host-fd.trace file grows extreme

[Bacula-users] Bacula 15.0.2 - Windows Clients name-fd.trace File Grows Extremely Fast

Hi All, I am having a strange issue regarding Bacula 15.0.2 on Windows Clients. Clients were installed using the Bacula 15.0.2 Binaries from bacula.org. We noticed that the C:\Program Files\Bacula\working\host-fd.trace file grows extremely fast every time a backup occurs. Here is an example of

[Bacula-users] Bacula 15.0.2 - Windows Clients name-fd.trace File Grows Extremely Fast

Hi All, I am having a strange issue regarding Bacula 15.0.2 on Windows Clients. Clients were installed using the Bacula 15.0.2 Binaries from bacula.org. We noticed that the C:\Program Files\Bacula\working\host-fd.trace file grows extremely fast every time a backup occurs. Here is an example of

Re: [Bacula-users] bacula setup hangs, need help debugging

On 9/11/24 1:55 AM, Simon Flutura wrote: Hi, I inherited a bacula setup, backing several machines up on tape. Sadly the setup hangs, no network/cpu/io activity while jobs are running forever. We are running Bacula   11.0.6. Do you have any clue where to start in debugging the setup? Best,

[Bacula-users] bacula setup hangs, need help debugging

Hi, I inherited a bacula setup, backing several machines up on tape. Sadly the setup hangs, no network/cpu/io activity while jobs are running forever. We are running Bacula   11.0.6. Do you have any clue where to start in debugging the setup? Best, Simon _

Re: [Bacula-users] bacula rescue cdrom source code

On Sat, Aug 24, 2024, at 5:03 AM, Josip Deanovic via Bacula-users wrote: > On 2024-08-24 01:32, Jose Alberto wrote: >> rear with bacula? work??? Test >> >> https://packages.debian.org/bookworm/rear > > Hello, > > Yes, it works. > I am using it for several years now, with Centos 6, Centos

Re: [Bacula-users] bacula rescue cdrom source code

On 2024-08-24 01:32, Jose Alberto wrote: rear with bacula? work??? Test https://packages.debian.org/bookworm/rear Hello, Yes, it works. I am using it for several years now, with Centos 6, Centos 7, Centos 8, Debian 10, Debian 11 and Debian 12. In my case, bootable rear image is betwe

Re: [Bacula-users] bacula rescue cdrom source code

rear with bacula? work??? Test https://packages.debian.org/bookworm/rear On Thu, Aug 1, 2024 at 1:37 PM Bill Arlofski via Bacula-users < bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote: > On 8/1/24 7:31 AM, William Rice wrote: > > > > Hello I'm trying to loca

Re: [Bacula-users] bacula rescue cdrom source code

gt;ph...@caerllewys.net >p...@co.ordinate.org >Landline: +1.603.293.8485 >Mobile: +1.603.998.6958 > > > > _______ > Bacula-users mailing list > Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net

Re: [Bacula-users] bacula rescue cdrom source code

On 8/1/24 13:35, Bill Arlofski via Bacula-users wrote: On 8/1/24 7:31 AM, William Rice wrote: > Hello I'm trying to locate the bacula-rescue cdrom source code so I can make a Bare Metal Recovery cdrom for bacula-9.0.8 Any help would be greatly appreciated! For what it's worth: What I do

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 15.0.2 and Baculum 11.0

Thank you, Marcin. That link (https://baculum.app/doc/brief/installation.html#manual-installation) led me to the newest Baculum. BTW, I do use your Bacularis and like it. It is just that I want both especially since I am still fairly new to Bacula and I see no harm in having both. Thank

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 15.0.2 and Baculum 11.0

On Mon, 19 Aug 2024 at 14:16, Mehrdad Ravanbod wrote: > Hi > > I have recently installed Bacula and Bacularis, i did not install v. 15 > simply because it is too new, but installing bacularis I have seen no > mention of incompatibilities with verion 15, and I have not seen it > mentioned anywhere

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 15.0.2 and Baculum 11.0

orge.net> >     <mailto:Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net <mailto:Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net>> >      >     <mailto:Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net <mailto:Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net> >     <mailto:B

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 15.0.2 and Baculum 11.0

On Mon, 19 Aug 2024 at 03:29, Rob Gerber wrote: > > I hope someone else on this list can shed some light on this. Perhaps > Marcin? > Hello Everybody, Thanks, Rob. Yes, I will try to explain it. The latest Baculum release is 15.0.2 released as usual together with Bacula 15.0.2. It can be inst

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 15.0.2 and Baculum 11.0

gt; <mailto:enrico.becche...@gmail.com>>> wrote: > > > > > > Dear all, > > > Can you tell me if Baculum version 11.0 is compatible with > Bacula > > > 15.0.2 ? > > > Is there a newer version of Bac

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 15.0.2 and Baculum 11.0

s@lists.sourceforge.net> >     <mailto:Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net <mailto:Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net>> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users> >     <https://lists.s

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 15.0.2 and Baculum 11.0

-Willy- > > _______ > > Bacula-users mailing list > > Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net > > <mailto:Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net> > > https://lists.sourcef

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 15.0.2 and Baculum 11.0

https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users> _______ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourc

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 15.0.2 and Baculum 11.0

1.0 is compatible with Bacula 15.0.2 ? > Is there a newer version of Baculum ? > Thanks a lot > Best Regards > -Willy- > ___ > Bacula-users mailing list > Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.so

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 15.0.2 and Baculum 11.0

; wrote: > >> Dear all, >> Can you tell me if Baculum version 11.0 is compatible with Bacula 15.0.2 ? >> Is there a newer version of Baculum ? >> Thanks a lot >> Best Regards >> -Willy- >> _____

[Bacula-users] Bacula 15.0.2 and Baculum 11.0

Dear all, Can you tell me if Baculum version 11.0 is compatible with Bacula 15.0.2 ? Is there a newer version of Baculum ? Thanks a lot Best Regards -Willy- ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lis

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >