s
> 501 k
> Skipping packages with broken dependencies:
> bacula-directorx86_64
> 9.0.7-3.fc28updates
> 400 k
> bacula-storage x86_64
> 9.0.7-3.fc28 updates
> 185 k
>
> Transaction Summary
>
> ==
Working on it, sorry for the delay.
Regards,
--Simone
On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 11:44 AM, Bill Damage via Bacula-users <
bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote:
> I can't understand the "nothing provides message". It must come from
> somewhere since it's a bacula-dir dependency. Where does it c
Mind using the rebuilds from the Fedora packages?
People have been using them for years now and seems to be happy:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/slaanesh/Bacula/
Please read the various README files. Upgrade from previous version
(example the 5.0.0 version in RHEL 7) is still supported.
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 9:03 AM, Can Şirin wrote:
> It is the same again. It is definitely related with enable-bat option. Did
> you compiled it properly with bat?
>
> Quoting Ralf Brinkmann :
>
> For a new try I'd set the compile options to a minimum, e.g.:
>
> --with-postgresql
> --enable-
On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 9:28 AM, Simone Caronni
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> you might as well use pre-built binaries:
>
Sorry, keyboard error :/
Damn gmail.
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/slaanesh/Bacula/
Those are exactly the same builds in Fedora that will eventually go into
RHEL.
Hi,
you might as well use pre-built binaries:
On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 1:29 AM, Heitor Faria wrote:
> List,
>
> Hello, Jerry,
>
> I am still trying to resolve my 9.0.3 install from a week or so ago. I
> have had to rebuild the server due to numerous problems. I am using the
> same configure
I had the chance to manage the following:
- Around 600 clients
- 15 different storage daemons with disk storage or automated tape libraries
- Automated laptop backups based on the site where they are connected
(basically triggering backups to the closest SD storage daemon based on
their DNS record
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 11:25 AM, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> Thanks for jumping on the new release so soon.
no worries. As I wrote in the ticket, this could have probably been spotted
in one of the candidate releases but I've been too busy to attempt build
them. Sorry for that.
Thanks,
--Simon
Hi Kern,
On Fri, Jul 7, 2017 at 2:01 PM, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> In fact, there are so many new features that I have not myself had a
> chance to test them (e.g. the new Tray Monitor that includes client (user)
> initiated backups — even from remote laptops.
I can't build the new tray monitor, i
Hello,
I'm the Fedora maintainer.
On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 3:49 PM, Hicks, Daniel CTR OSD DMEA <
daniel.hicks@dmea.osd.mil> wrote:
>
> I started using Bacula with 7 and it looked for MariaDB during the
> installation, using the CentOS 7 rpms. When I went to 7.4.7 I had to
> compile from source
Hi,
On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 8:29 PM, Tom Plancon wrote:
> Initially the client on the 6.8 machine was bacula 5.0 so I thought that
> was the issue. I built a 7.0.5 client from source on the 6.8 machine but
> still the same error!
>
If you don't want to use the RHEL/CentOS provided packages pleas
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 5:49 PM, Tom Plancon wrote:
> I'm setting up bacula on a CentOS 7 machine. Using yum to install I get
> bacula 7.0.5-7 installed. A client I want to back up is running CentOS 6.8
> and yum wants to install bacula 5.0.0-13 there. I've found rpms for the
> client, fd,
On Sun, Mar 12, 2017 at 9:08 AM, Erik P. Olsen wrote:
> On 2017-03-12 at 07:05:49 Kern Sibbald wrote:
>
> > You probably forgot to run the ./grant_mysql_permissions script.
>
> No, I did not forget because I didn't know and this script is not on my
> system and further more it is not mentioned in
Hi Erik,
On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 3:21 PM, Erik P. Olsen wrote:
>
> I'll look into all your advice as soon as possible.
actually, if there's anything obvious missing please let me know and I'll
add it. The procedure in the quickstart files is automated on my system for
checking discrepancies with
Hi Erik,
On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 1:26 PM, Gary R. Schmidt
wrote:
> On 06/03/2017 08:51, Erik P. Olsen wrote:
> > I noticed "Access denied for user ''@'localhost' ...". Where does this
> > user come from? Isn't that the reason for the failures and if it's
> > true what can I do to correct it? Also
Please try the repository contains a rebuild of the official packages for
RHEL/CentOS and Fedora.
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/slaanesh/Bacula/
Upgrade is straightforward from CentOS 6/7 packages and does not have any
external dependencies.
Regards,
--Simone
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at
Hello,
On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 1:36 PM, Viraj Bhujbal
wrote:
> Now, I want to take backup of my Linux 7 & CentOS 7 machine in my network
> to this FreeNAS.
>
> Please let me know how do I proceed.
>
You can use the backport repository for 7.4. It supports all non-EOL
releases of RHEL/CentOS and
On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 8:38 AM, KEN SAWADA wrote:
> Hello
>
> I am using the Bacula7.0.5.
> I have installed the Bacula using following repository
>
> https://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/slaanesh/bacula7/epel-bacula7.repo
>
> I'd like to version up by the yum, Do you have the latest repository
,
--Simone
On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 5:49 PM, Simone Caronni wrote:
> Sorry, I've not been reading this list recently, I'm swamped at work.
> The Fedora 24 package got built before the release, and I've forgot to
> test it. I've no production systems with Bacula on Fedora ex
Sorry, I've not been reading this list recently, I'm swamped at work.
The Fedora 24 package got built before the release, and I've forgot to test
it. I've no production systems with Bacula on Fedora except one laptop.
There is a new update coming with the workaround, it will be available in
updates
Hello,
I'm travelling around Japan, so my connectivity is limited. I'm answering
from my mobile.
PostgreSQL support is there, it's simply using the alternatives back end to
select the library to use (PostgreSQL/MySQL/Sqlite).
Please read the README included in the bacula-common package.
Also, y
Hi Norbert,
I'm the Bacula mantainer for Fedora. can you use the rebuild I do of
current packages for RHEL/CentOS and Fedora? You can upgrade directly from
CentOS/RHEL packages straight to them.
They have all features enabled. Please read the included README file in
bacula-common.
Bacula 5.2: htt
There's PostgreSQL version 9.2 in the Software Collection.
Both RHEL/CentOS 6 have it, so if that is enough for you, the easiest thing
would be to change the spec file of the 7.4 backport a bit and rebuild it
against the SCL packages.
Regards,
--Simone
On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 10:24 PM, Michael Mu
They should work, but there are new 7.x binaries for free on the bacula's
website:
http://blog.bacula.org/download-center/
Can you upgrade to that version?
Regards,
--Simone
On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 7:38 PM, Dan Langille wrote:
> On Jan 26, 2016, at 12:15 PM, Erik P. Olsen wrote:
> >
> > Is W
Hello list,
just a recap as I've not written much for quite a long time. I'm the
maintainer of the Bacula packages in Fedora, and I've just updated the
Bacula backports repository to version 7.4.0. Being a simple increment on
7.2.0, I've udpated it in place. It is provided for all non-EOL
distribu
Hello,
Bacula 7.2.0 is now in rawhide (Fedora 24) and pending update in Fedora 23,
the idea is to have Fedora 23 already shipping with Bacula 7.2.x.
I'm planning to delete the Bacula 5.x repository on fedorapeople [1] and
just leave the one that contains Bacula 7.0.x [2] for CentOS/RHEL 5/6/7.
W
Hello,
On 4 August 2015 at 03:37, Craig Shiroma wrote:
> Many (if not all) have the permissions srw-rw-rw- on the object. With
> bacula_t set to permissive, the errors don't seem to occur. Besides the
> restore problem which I can get around and the one above, are there any
> other problems wi
Hello,
On 26 May 2015 at 20:07, Dimitri Maziuk wrote:
> I meant to post this back when I played when 5.2.13 and I don't think I
> did, anyway, this is in 7.0.5 as well. I'm not sure what, if anyhting,
> you'd want to do about it.
>
> BackupCatalog job in director config has
> > RunBeforeJob = "/
Bacula update:
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/bacula.git/commit/?id=1fabaac9b062998e6497cdd073a432ab8753c554
RHEL bug:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1221903
Regards,
--Simone
On 15 May 2015 at 10:02, Simone Caronni wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 14 May 2015 at 19:17
Hello,
On 14 May 2015 at 19:17, Dimitri Maziuk wrote:
> Hi Simone,
>
> another minor glitch: bacula-director installs logwatch. It shouldn't.
>
> Especially since it's b0rk3d on centos 7: it's installed with "--output
> mail" in /etc/cron.daily/0logwatch so it's ignoring the "Save =" in
> logwat
Hello,
On 13 May 2015 at 19:59, Dimitri Maziuk wrote:
> here's another one from today's update.
>
> yum log:
> ...
> > May 13 12:43:57 Updated: bacula-storage-7.0.5-6.el7.x86_64
> > May 13 12:43:57 Updated: bacula-director-7.0.5-6.el7.x86_64
> ...
>
> messages:
>
> [...]
>
> End result: a dozen
cular corner
case, but I would not consider it a bug and I'm not sure it's the correct
way to deal with it..
Update has been uploaded.
Regards,
--Simone
On 12 May 2015 at 13:19, Simone Caronni wrote:
> Hello,
>
> on a freshly installed minimal CentOS 7 VM just the fonts
Hello,
on a freshly installed minimal CentOS 7 VM just the fonts are enough; I
will add those.
If you still have your old transaction available you can use the "yum
history" command to remove the extra packages you installed.
--Simone
On 12 May 2015 at 11:23, Simone Caronni wrote
Hello,
thanks for reporting!
I will add them in the next few hours (currently busy at the moment).
Regards,
--Simone
On 12 May 2015 at 01:10, Dimitri Maziuk wrote:
> PS. this was a fresh install of centos 7.1 x86_64.
> --
> Dimitri Maziuk
> Programmer/sysadmin
> BioMagResBank, UW-Madison --
Hi Waqar,
On 27 March 2015 at 15:08, Waqar Khan wrote:
> 5.0.0 is in the base repo but I can’t see 5.2.13 in there. What’s the best
> way to get to 5.2.13 first? Where can I get update_bacula_tables from +
> documentation :P
>
I'm the Bacula Fedora maintainer, and the packages go directly from
Hello,
if you look carefully it's an old mail from 2011.
Don't know what's happening but don't pay too much attention to it.
Regards,
--Simone
On 17 March 2015 at 18:07, Raymond Burns Jr. wrote:
> I am now confused
> I thought future development would be on 7.x not 5.x
> What is going on?
So far, any library or single tape device I've ever thrown at Bacula on
RHEL/Fedora does work. As long as it's recognized by the system as a tape
device/library it is supported by Bacula.
I've tested SCSI, USB, iSCSI, SAS units in various DAT/LTO combinations.
USB devices have always been single t
On 8 February 2015 at 20:32, Isamar Maia wrote:
> When we need to change tape of another pool(Ex: month or week), it
> doesn't load the tape. But it is labeled and in the changer.
>
> 08-Fev 13:58 itaparica-sd JobId 48614: Warning: mount.c:217 Open
> device "Fita" (/dev/nst0) Volume "KDZ050L4" fa
Hello,
you don't need a few of those steps. Upgrade Bacula (or Fedora to version
21) as is from packages, and run the upgrade script for the database.
No other change is necessary; your old configuration files will keep on
working.
Regards,
--Simone
On 9 January 2015 at 00:22, Erik P. Olsen w
Hello,
I'm the maintainer of the Fedora packages. Here is the repository for the
Bacula 7 packages for all supported Fedora/CentOS/RHEL releases:
https://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/slaanesh/bacula7/
They are exactly the same rebuild of the current f21/rawhide packages. ARM
v7 builds are includ
Hello,
I can't help you as I'm currently travelling through Indochina without
connectivity.
The packages work fine, in fact they are almost the same that have been put
into rhel 7. I do not suggest to disable SELinux, you should first try to
set up things as described in the readme and quickstart
On Dec 4, 2014 5:58 PM, "Dan Langille" wrote:
> Bacula talks to the SCSCI interface, not to the tape library itself. If
it talks SCSI to FreeBSD, it should just work.
Same in Linux. Also iSCSI libraries work.
--
Downloa
Hello,
I've been using Dell LT2000 libraries with barcode readers for the past 7
years (SAS, SCSI). No issues at all; I would really recommend those
libraries.
No experience on Fujitsu libraries.
Regards,
--Simone
On 21 November 2014 12:23, Luca Codutti wrote:
> Dear Bacula users,
> I am cur
Hello,
On 18 November 2014 13:06, Uwe Schuerkamp wrote:
> is it possible to run the bacula-fd as a non-root user (knowing full
> well that certain parts of the system can't be backed up properly
> then)?
>
if you use the command line switch "-k" it will drop all privileges except
ReadAll.
Don'
Hello,
you should do some debugging on the SELinux side, this is not related to
Bacula. It is too complicated to explain by mail, Redhat docs are very
good in this regard.
On Fri, 2014-11-07 at 13:06 -0500, Humphrey Bryant wrote:
> I check, recheck and double check all permissions on my volumes/f
On 7 November 2014 10:43, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> Yes, you are correct, currently there is no Makefile command to install
> the systemd files. I like your idea of adding a new configure option.
> I would probably prefer "with-systemd-dir=" which corresponds to how the
> other directories work, the
Sorry, I forgot to reply to all. Mail re-attached:
Hi Kern,
On 7 November 2014 10:51, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> Would it be worth while to include your enhanced systemd files in the
> Bacula source release for those users who either want to build themselves
> or who want a more advanced template?
Hello,
I'm the maintainer of Bacula in Fedora and I've been providing repositories
for both Bacula 5.x and Bacula 7.x. These are the repositories, based on
rebuilt packages that are in Fedora rawhide:
https://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/slaanesh/bacula7/
https://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/slaa
Hello,
On 22 October 2014 10:24, Robert Oschwald wrote:
> One thing which annoys me is that the sg device node for TapeAlert changes
> with every reboot from /dev/sg4 to /dev/sg6 and vice versa.
> Is there any setting I can set in udev to get sticky device nodes for my
> tape device changer devi
Actually starting Bacula for the first time is a lot simpler... just look
at the various quickstart files that are included in the package
bacula-common:
[slaanesh@localhost bacula-common]$ pwd
/usr/share/doc/bacula-common
[slaanesh@localhost bacula-common]$ ls -l
total 16
-rw-r--r--. 1 root root
please let me know.
Regards,
--Simone
Regards,
> Jose
>
> 2014-09-03 14:52 GMT+02:00 Simone Caronni :
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> On 3 September 2014 13:58, José Vicente Mondejar <
>> jvmonde...@myferrylink.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
Hello,
On 3 September 2014 13:58, José Vicente Mondejar wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm considering upgrading our bacula servers and clients from 5.x to 7.0.5.
> Our servers configurations are:
> CentOS 5.5 / bacula 5.2.12 (installed from sources) / mysql 5.0.95
> CentOS 5.5 / bacula 5.2.13 (installed f
Hello,
On 23 August 2014 17:05, Tim Dunphy wrote:
> Recently backup jobs started failing when I try to backup a remote client
> and when I tried to back up the local client (that is the bacula server
> itself). The remote client is called 'beta-new.mydomain.com' and the
> bacula server is called
Never tried, but since the media type is only a label in the database, you
did correctly and should be able to read them does it work?
Regards,
--Simone
On 22 August 2014 18:39, Dan Langille wrote:
> I have an SDLT tape library and many old DLT tapes created on my previous
> library.
>
> S
Hello,
one per tape, as far as I know there are no tape drives with multiple heads
that can write simultaneously. This is mitigated by running multiple jobs
concurrently and by spooling each one sequentially on tapes; and I've never
had a problem with them.
It does support multi tape libraries pe
4 August 2014 15:15, Simone Caronni wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 3 August 2014 17:39, Bill Arlofski wrote:
>>
>> You might want to post a bug report to the Centos 6.5 Bacula 7 package's
>> maintainer and point this out.
>>
>
> Here I am, just came back f
Hello,
On 3 August 2014 17:39, Bill Arlofski wrote:
>
> You might want to post a bug report to the Centos 6.5 Bacula 7 package's
> maintainer and point this out.
>
Here I am, just came back from holiday :)
In the bacula-common page, there's a README with a section on the file
permissions that h
Hello,
On 31 July 2014 14:11, J. Echter wrote:
> since today i have trouble updating to the latest rls.
>
> i know bacula isn't responsible for the above mentioned repo, but maybe
> you guys know how to fix it. :)
>
> the dependency error i get looks like this:
>
I think you just triggered the
Hello,
same repository as before:
https://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/slaanesh/bacula7/
You might need to adjust the repo file in /etc/yum.repos.d to point it to
the epel5 folder.
Regards,
--Simone
On 25 July 2014 19:53, More, Ankush wrote:
> Hi Team,
> We have installed Bacula-7.0.4 on Ce
On 23 July 2014 16:18, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> On 07/23/2014 04:04 PM, Stephen Thompson wrote:
> > Redhat 6.5 x86_64
>
> OK, that is a particularly tricky system as they have added additional
> system security which does not permit certain sequences of API calls
> even as root which other Linux OSe
You didn't read the documents I told you earlier, did you?
[root@localhost ~]# cd /usr/share/doc/bacula-common-7.0.4/
[root@localhost bacula-common-7.0.4]# ls -al
total 60
drwxr-xr-x. 2 root root 4096 Jun 19 16:33 .
drwxr-xr-x. 771 root root 36864 Jun 19 16:35 ..
-rw-r--r--. 1 root root 1727
Hello,
On 11 June 2014 18:02, More, Ankush wrote:
> I have installed (with RPM's) Bacula 5.0 on Centos 6.5 working fine.
> Want to install 7.x with RPM's (latest version) on same server.
>
> What is best method to do?
> Do I have remove 5.x and install 7.x RPM's?
> What will happen to MySql data
Hello,
On 3 June 2014 16:17, More, Ankush wrote:
> I want to upgrade Bacula 5.0 to 7 version on Centos 6.5 OS.
> Please let me steps or documents.
>
There are two repositories with backports for all supported
CentOS/RHEL/Fedora distributions. One is for 5.2.13 and one is for 7.0.x:
http://repo
Hello,
On 3 June 2014 11:33, Gary Stainburn wrote:
> I'm running my Bacula director and main storeage on a Fedora 17 system
> using
> the standard Fedora RPM's for DIR, SD and FD.
>
> I'm planning on using fedup to upgrade it to 18 and assuming all goes
> well, up
> to 19. Are there are issues r
On 2 June 2014 15:28, kamran ayub wrote:
> I want to configure bacula 7.0.3 on my centos 6.4 system. Please can
> anybody share me the installation manual for this version.
> Thanks
>
There are two repositories with rawhide backports for all supported
CentOS/RHEL/Fedora distributions. One is for
Hello,
On 27 May 2014 12:09, Josip Deanovic wrote:
> Quoting message written on Tuesday 2014-05-27 02:43:29 by Rickinfl:
> > Did you install Bacula 7 on CentOS? We don't have any other options but
> > to run 5.0 right now.
>
> I have used spec file for bacula 7.0.2 from fedora 21 repository and
Hello,
On 8 May 2014 13:40, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
> CentOS 6 has bacula 5.0.0 which has a bug so that it prunes jobs older
> than 43 years, no matter how it was defined for director.
>
> I could not find a repo or rpm for full Bacula package (only for
> client), but hopefully someone else know
On 27 March 2014 12:00, Simone Caronni wrote:
> With the release of version 7.0.0 of the community version I plan to
> maintain a separate repository that contains this version. The packages
> will start their life in Fedora rawhide and be available in this repository
> for a
Currently, the repository is hosted at:
http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/slaanesh/bacula/
and provides the latest Fedora packages built also for older releases and
RHEL supported platforms (that is non-EOL).
I will try to cotribute in the planned 3rd party repository section on the
Bacula's w
On 27 March 2014 10:49, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> please see:
>
> http://blog.bacula.org/category/status-reports/
Unfortunately I've not been able to attend the Bacula conference due to
work travels, but great job!!
Cool website, cool slides, cool features.
I've read all the slides; really looki
On 3 February 2014 15:32, goorooj wrote:
> with your infos i searched for bacula-client custom repo and was lucky.
> 5.0.2 client ( my server version ) for centos5/xen installs quite nicely
> when you:
> add this into /etc/yum.repos.d/CentOS-Base.repo:
>
> [home_dassit_bacula_bacula_build]
> name
Hello,
On 3 February 2014 14:22, goorooj wrote:
> i want to install bacula-client on my xenservers 6.2 to backup the virtual
> machines to my bacula-server, but i can´t install the client on my xen
> servers.
> xenserver ist stripped down CentOs 5, i enabled all repositories in
> CentOS_Base.rep
On 22 January 2014 15:38, Rickinfl wrote:
> Hi, I installed Bacula on my CentOS 6.5 box and it installed version 5.0.
> I noticed there is a version 5.2.13. Why did it install 5.0? Can I
> upgrade to 5.2.13?
>
Bacula 5.0.0 is the version shipped in RHEL, and the version that is
supported by t
Hello,
I've updated the Fedora / RHEL / CentOS repository. Nothing special here,
as there have been no releases recently.
I've removed the EOL Fedora 18 repository, added the Fedora 20 and
RHEL/CentOS 7 one.
http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/slaanesh/bacula/README.txt
http://repos.fedorapeople
Hello,
On 25 November 2013 18:07, Hiren Joshi wrote:
>
> I have a director on centos 5 running version 2.0.3-10.el5.
> I have a number of fd on centos 5 running the same version.
>
> I'd like to now back up a centos 6 machine but I can't get 2.X on it only
> version 5.
>
> I'm assuming this isn't
Hello,
On 20 November 2013 16:58, Hans Thueminger wrote:
>
> The first thing we have to do is to split the 3x120TB in 6x60TB since
> Microsoft does not support VSS for filesystems >(64TB-8GB) not even with
> the latest release (Server-2012-R2). This is a not documented "design" and
> we got this
Hello,
On 20 November 2013 17:01, Henrique Machado wrote:
>
> OS: Fedora release 15 (Lovelock)
> Bacula Version: 5.2.6
>
mysql Ver 14.14 Distrib 5.5.23, for Linux (x86_64) using readline 5.1
>
The distribution has been End of Life since 2012-06-26 (17 months ago).
Bacula has seen numerous impro
Hello,
On 25 August 2013 20:36, Benny_pixelweb wrote:
> I'm sorry the bacula version is 5.2.13. But i tried your link and there
> read the readme file.
>
version 5.2.11 is long gone from that repository, 5.2.13 is what's left.
> The only thing is that i never have it installed the right way, i
Hello,
Please try the repository at:
http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/slaanesh/bacula/
Please read the readme files.
Regards,
--Simone
On Aug 23, 2013 2:35 PM, "Benny_pixelweb"
wrote:
> hi Simone,
>
> It must be installed on a linux (redhat 6) server. To backup other linux
> servers.
> the
Hello,
On 22 August 2013 16:19, Benny_pixelweb wrote:
> Where can i find the best tutorial to install the latest version from
> bacula backup?
>
from source? packages? which distribution/OS?
Regards,
--Simone
--
You cannot discover new oceans unless you have the courage to lose sight of
the s
The Fedora / RHEL / CentOS repository has been updated with a couple of
patches.
Fedora 17 has now gone EOL, so support for it has been removed.
http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/slaanesh/bacula/README.txt
http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/slaanesh/bacula/
Any feedback is greatly appreciated.
Can you try the commands explained on your README.Redhat line 40?
The file is also available here.
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/bacula.git/tree/README.Redhat
Regards,
--Simone
On 3 June 2013 07:41, revslikehell wrote:
> i am having a hardtime backing up catalog.. backupclient and rest
Hello,
are you using spooling on your jobs? Or writing directly to the storage
device?
Regards,
--Simone
On 17 May 2013 14:05, Clark, Patricia A. wrote:
> I am using the latest version, 5.2.13-9, from the epel-bacula repository.
> There are a number of long reported issues that seem to be p
Hello,
On 19 April 2013 18:49, Humphrey Bryant wrote:
> I never had any problems doing restores on 5.2.12 its only since I
> upgraded to 5.2.13, hope someone can shed some light on this issue (I'm
> backing up to File not tapes).
>
when restoring Windows files to another location that is not
Have you installed 5.2.13 on your own, from the updates-testing repository
[1] or from my repository [2]?
Can you please check the last part of the file
/usr/share/doc/bacula-common-5.2.13/README.Redhat
and see if it's a permission problem on the /etc/bacula directory?
[1]
https://admin.fedorap
Hello,
the Fedora / RHEL / CentOS repository has been updated with a couple of
patches related to the RHEL 7 review; thanks to Petr Hracek @ Redhat.
Fedora 17 and 18 packages are identical to those in updates-testing.
http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/slaanesh/bacula/README.txt
http://repos.fe
Hello,
On 21 March 2013 16:14, Christoph Litauer wrote:
> So I wonder if VSS won't fit my needs _without_ doing a ntbackup
> systemstate with clientRunBeforeJob? Will a VSS backup of partition C: save
> all system relevant information (registry etc.) for disaster recovery?
>
I've succesfully re
If I remember correctly, version 5.0 of the Windows File Daemon was saving
the config file in a user folder; while 5.2 uses a config file in the
program folder might be the issue you are facing?
On 6 March 2013 14:13, Erik P. Olsen wrote:
> Few days ago I installed bacula 5.2.12 on my Fedor
On 25 February 2013 11:22, Timo Neuvonen wrote
> I need to admit I couldn't right now follow why this solved it.
> But yes, it did solve the problem :-)
>
It took me some time, in fact :)
The director start as root, reads the config file and forks with
bacula:bacula.
After that, to be able to
On 25 February 2013 09:14, Simone Caronni wrote:
> Restore /etc/bacula to the default permissions + bacula group:
>
> chown -R root:root /etc/bacula
> chgrp bacula /etc/bacula \
> /etc/bacula/bacula-dir.conf
> /etc/bacula/query.sql
>
Well, this should be be
Hello,
something has changed that is preventing this from working, the package has
not changed in the last months regarding this.
Can you please test the following?
On 23 February 2013 21:57, Timo Neuvonen wrote:
> I updated 5.2.12 -> 5.2.13 via 'yum update' from EPEL repo on CentOS 6 x64
> sys
Hello,
On 23 February 2013 21:57, Timo Neuvonen wrote:
> I updated 5.2.12 -> 5.2.13 via 'yum update' from EPEL repo on CentOS 6 x64
> system.
>
> A couple of issues:
>
> - storage daemon run as bacula:tape could not any more access the tape
> changer owned by root:tape (660).
> As a dirty fix I
On 21 February 2013 10:32, wrote:
> Hm, Ubuntu 12.04 ships with Qt version 4.8.1 and i'm for sure not fond
> of replacing it by source compiled Qt version. What is the reason for
> 4.8.4 instead of > 4.8.0??
>
Bug fixing on the qt side, probably. The minimum version required by the
code to compi
Hello,
On 15 February 2013 16:36, Simone Caronni wrote:
> the Fedora / RHEL / CentOS repository has been updated with a couple of
> small fixes related to the RHEL 7 branching, and as of today, Fedora 16 has
> been removed as it's End of Life.
>
> Fedora 17 and 18 packa
Hello,
the Fedora / RHEL / CentOS repository has been updated with a couple of
small fixes related to the RHEL 7 branching, and as of today, Fedora 16 has
been removed as it's End of Life.
Fedora 17 and 18 packages are identical to those in updates-testing.
http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/sl
Hello,
On 12 February 2013 07:33, John Kenyon wrote:
> I've successfully managed to cross compile the bacula win32 installer for
> version 5.2.12, however this only produces the bacula-fd I need
> bacula-sd
>
would you like to share with us the procedure you used for building the
windows bi
Hello,
On 6 February 2013 15:19, Dan Langille wrote:
> Keep in mind that a given Bacula binary can access only one database
> type. e.g. PostgreSQL.
>
> If compiled for PostgreSQL, that's what it will work with. not MySQL.
>
> However, I *seem* to recall something about compiling for all, or
>
Hello,
On 6 February 2013 06:48, Jake G. wrote:
> Your repo looks great!. I have added it to my new server. However, do you
> have a preferred install instructions that you use?
>
there's no "preferred" installation method, just install the packages you
require.
If you want a quick setup; look
Hello,
I mantain a repository of the current Fedora packages for all Fedora
supported distributions (RHEL/CentOS 5/6, Fedora 16/17/18) at:
http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/slaanesh/bacula/
They are the same that are in Fedora 17/18/rawhide, they contain the latest
5.2.12 and the package will
On 16 January 2013 16:40, Jonathan Horne wrote:
> In actuality, there is 7GB of data on the computer. Bacula thoughfully
> backs up 14GB.
>
> Is there a way to tell bacula to ignore the special file systems and only
> backup the real file systems?
>
I backup Fedora systems, but only specific f
1 - 100 of 178 matches
Mail list logo
