Hello,

On 4 August 2015 at 03:37, Craig Shiroma <shiroma.crai...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Many (if not all) have the permissions srw-rw-rw- on the object.  With
> bacula_t set to permissive, the errors don't seem to occur.  Besides the
> restore problem which I can get around and the one above, are there any
> other problems with leaving bacula_t enforced?  Is the problem above
> something to be worried about?  I rather leave bacula_t enforced if
> possible (unless it is not recommended).
>

I've been running Bacula with SELinux in enforcing mode for a few years now
and did not have any issue. Error on sockets are not a problem, you can
ignore those. They are created when the program starts.

Regards,
--Simone




-- 
You cannot discover new oceans unless you have the courage to lose sight of
the shore (R. W. Emerson).

http://xkcd.com/229/
http://negativo17.org/
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

Reply via email to