Why don't you simply re-install MySQL. Re-installation of MySQL or
installation of a new version of MySQL should not damage the existing
database. Unless one of the database files has been damaged (iddata1?),
MySQL should be back up and running with the old database intact. There
is a repair
The manual has a very complete chapter on MySQL that tells you how to
resolve connection problems.
On 10/03/2016 05:19 AM, Michael Munger wrote:
> I have restored the bacula mysql tables to a new installation of MySQL
> server, but the director cannot connect and is complaining that the
> MySQL c
On 10/02/16 23:19, Michael Munger wrote:
> I have restored the bacula mysql tables to a new installation of MySQL
> server, but the director cannot connect and is complaining that the
> MySQL credentials are not correct.
>
> Where is this in the conf files? I have grepped and googled, and cannot
I have restored the bacula mysql tables to a new installation of MySQL
server, but the director cannot connect and is complaining that the
MySQL credentials are not correct.
Where is this in the conf files? I have grepped and googled, and cannot
figure it out.
---
I foolishly installed KDE on Debian, which ... for some reason ...
decided to uninstall mysql-server, and in the course of doing so,
corrupted some tables (ibdata1, for example). Since these files are
corrupt, innodb won't start. I now have checksum failures, and mysql
won't start unless I delete t
On 10/02/2016 09:03 PM, Jan Martin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Well, if not Debian, maybe we can interest Ubuntu in fixing the 7.0.5
> bacula in their 16.04 distribution, since it's an LTS version. That
> would help those distros that inherit from Ubuntu, like Mint, maybe?
>
> -Jan
>
> On 10/02/2016 09:58 AM
On 10/02/2016 08:41 PM, Ian Douglas wrote:
> On Sunday 02 October 2016 18:56:31 Kern Sibbald wrote:
>
>> For simple "manual" things such as what you are doing, it is *far*
>> easier to use bconsole. Bat is far more useful when you are looking at
>> a number of Volumes or Job reports, ... Bat is
On 10/02/2016 08:57 PM, Phil Stracchino wrote:
> On 10/02/16 14:41, Ian Douglas wrote:
>> On Sunday 02 October 2016 18:56:31 Kern Sibbald wrote:
>>
>>> For simple "manual" things such as what you are doing, it is *far*
>>> easier to use bconsole. Bat is far more useful when you are looking at
>>>
Um 12:03 Uhr am 02.10.16 schrieb Jan Martin:
> Well, if not Debian, maybe we can interest Ubuntu in fixing the 7.0.5
> bacula in their 16.04 distribution, since it's an LTS version. That
> would help those distros that inherit from Ubuntu, like Mint, maybe?
No need to do this, there is already
Hi,
Well, if not Debian, maybe we can interest Ubuntu in fixing the 7.0.5
bacula in their 16.04 distribution, since it's an LTS version. That
would help those distros that inherit from Ubuntu, like Mint, maybe?
-Jan
On 10/02/2016 09:58 AM, Sven Hartge wrote:
> On 02.10.2016 09:08, Hankins, Jo
On 10/02/16 14:41, Ian Douglas wrote:
> On Sunday 02 October 2016 18:56:31 Kern Sibbald wrote:
>
>> For simple "manual" things such as what you are doing, it is *far*
>> easier to use bconsole. Bat is far more useful when you are looking at
>> a number of Volumes or Job reports, ... Bat is no
On Sunday 02 October 2016 18:56:31 Kern Sibbald wrote:
> For simple "manual" things such as what you are doing, it is *far*
> easier to use bconsole. Bat is far more useful when you are looking at
> a number of Volumes or Job reports, ... Bat is not particularly good
> at doing console type
On 2016-10-02 11:46, Dimitri Maziuk wrote:
> Bacula's calim to support backup to disk is, let's say "optimistic",
^
claim
See also: lysdexia
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's
On 02.10.2016 09:08, Hankins, Jonathan wrote:
> Even though it's fixed in the 7.4.x from Ubuntu (probably in debian
> too), if it's indeed broken in debian, I'm going to ask if they can
> release an update to their 7.0.5 package in testing, so that people who
> track that, or distros that are deri
For simple "manual" things such as what you are doing, it is *far*
easier to use bconsole. Bat is far more useful when you are looking at
a number of Volumes or Job reports, ... Bat is not particularly good
at doing console type input.
On 10/02/2016 04:32 PM, Ian Douglas wrote:
> On Sunday 0
On 2016-10-01 15:37, Timo Neuvonen wrote:
> Will there be any problem in this case, if I try to simplify the conf files
> and drop away the "autochanger" and one of the two "storage devices" it
> refers to, and just had a single "storage device" per each media type?
Bacula's calim to support back
On Sunday 02 October 2016 14:23:18 Ian Douglas wrote:
> I've gone around in circles with mount, unmount, label, including
> physically removing the tape after unmount, but not getting anywhere.
Curiously, it has never asked me to specify the pool.
I've tried restarting bat but clearly the contr
hi All
Can't believe I'm having this runaround but I am.
Tape drive needed a new tape. So I unmount, put in new tape, and mount.
Guess I should have 'label' first.
But anyway, now Bacula sees the tape but insists it is unlabelled.
Automatically selected Catalog: MyCatalog
Automatically select
> As you said, the Autochangers/Devices definitions on the initial
> bacula-sd.conf file are suggestions on how to use a virtual disk
> autochanger with Bacula.
> There is a lot of ways to work with disk volumes others that using disk
> autochangers, yes.
> It will mostly depend on your environment
Hi Timo,
As you said, the Autochangers/Devices definitions on the initial
bacula-sd.conf file are suggestions on how to use a virtual disk
autochanger with Bacula.
There is a lot of ways to work with disk volumes others that using disk
autochangers, yes.
It will mostly depend on your environment
On 10/02/2016 09:08 AM, Hankins,
Jonathan wrote:
I'll have to dig a bit, but I
know the package source in Mint 18 is unmodified from Ubuntu
xenial, and I didn't see any indication that it was different
than what's in debian.
Hello Jonathan,
The only hope you have to get these changes made is to either
submit a Feature Request in the bugs database for each one, or
submit a patch -- also to the bugs database.
With emails, these ideas disappear in about a half hour as our
I'll have to dig a bit, but I know the package source in Mint 18 is
unmodified from Ubuntu xenial, and I didn't see any indication that it was
different than what's in debian.
I think what may be happening is, Ubuntu xenial (a LTS release IIRC) tracks
something newer than debian stable (maybe test
Kern,
If there's any work to improve the error from bconsole when the max console
connections are exceeded, it may be helpful to add a debug msg on the
director indicating this too...i think was running under debug level 9
and didn't see anything indicating that condition.
For that matter, ma
24 matches
Mail list logo
