On 10/02/2016 08:57 PM, Phil Stracchino wrote: > On 10/02/16 14:41, Ian Douglas wrote: >> On Sunday 02 October 2016 18:56:31 Kern Sibbald wrote: >> >>> For simple "manual" things such as what you are doing, it is *far* >>> easier to use bconsole. Bat is far more useful when you are looking at >>> a number of Volumes or Job reports, ... Bat is not particularly good >>> at doing console type input. >> Just found it odd, I assumed bat was a frontend to bconsole and so didn't >> bother trying bconsole because I figured if bat couldn't make it work, I >> wouldn't be able to either ... > No, it's more of an alternate console. But there are some things it > doesn't do well, like handling multiple warning/confirmation/status > messages emitted from a single command. Good explanation -- 100% correct. >
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
