bacula version:2.0.3
OS:Fedora core 6
Mysql:Yes
I have installed bacula server on my machine ,now I want to install bacula
client on solaris10 machine.Accrding to help doc I find that I need to
install "bacula-fd" on client machine, but there was not described how to
m
>
> > because bacula has a very complex tape scheduling routines...
>
Its even more complex. One thing I missed is what happens when a job
needs a tape from a pool but all tapes in the pool are marked as Full,
Used, Error or Archive. I believe in this case bacula first checks if
it can Recycle any
Thank You.
> because bacula has a very complex tape scheduling routines...
Right, and that confuses an (ex-)Amanda user like me...
> It asks for a specific tape but you can give it any appendable tape
> from the pool that it is using or a tape from the Scratch pool (see
> the docs on the Scratc
On 7/31/07, Ralf Auer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I do not believe the DB has this information as this is handled by the
> > scheduler while bacula is running. Although it may be possible for you
> > to query the list of jobs to be run then try to figure out what tape
> > would be needed.
>
> Bu
> I do not believe the DB has this information as this is handled by the
> scheduler while bacula is running. Although it may be possible for you
> to query the list of jobs to be run then try to figure out what tape
> would be needed.
But the scheduler has to get his info from somewhere or somebo
On 7/31/07, Robert LeBlanc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> I upgraded to 2.1.28 to see if I could get this working. I've set up our
> autochanger with two drives, but I can't mount a tape in the second drive.
> When asked for the drive I type in '1', but it says that it is mounting it
> in dri
On 7/31/07, Ralf Auer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> wow, that was quick!
>
>
> > You can have it do that when a job is running and a tape is needed but
> Right, I already configured that.
>
>
> > I am not sure of a way of doing that before the job that needs the
> > tape is running.
> O.K., that's n
Hi Frank,
nice to get so much help.
>> My problem is, that I have to write to both tapes simultaneously for
>> timing reason (but spooling to my HD-RAID). That's why I don't have a
>> tape changer and introduced the two different pools for 'full' and
>> 'incremental'. If it is possible to
I upgraded to 2.1.28 to see if I could get this working. I've set up our
autochanger with two drives, but I can't mount a tape in the second
drive. When asked for the drive I type in '1', but it says that it is
mounting it in drive '0'. Do I have the format wrong?
*mount
The defined Storage re
Ralf Auer wrote:
> Hello Frank,
>
> obviously I found an expert... Thanks for your reply.
Eh, I've just read the manual a few times =)
> The reason why I decided to have so many different pools was motivated
> by the (confusing) examples in the manual, so I DID read it, even more
> than tw
wow, that was quick!
> You can have it do that when a job is running and a tape is needed but
Right, I already configured that.
> I am not sure of a way of doing that before the job that needs the
> tape is running.
O.K., that's not good, 'cause I will not wait in the office until Bacula
compla
> And a more practial question:
> * 'Amanda' has this nice feature to send me a mail which tape to put
> into each drive before leaving office ('amcheck' cronjob).
> How does bacula remind me which tapes to put in today ?
>
You can have it do that when a job is running and a tape is needed but
I am
Hello Frank,
obviously I found an expert... Thanks for your reply.
The reason why I decided to have so many different pools was motivated
by the (confusing) examples in the manual, so I DID read it, even more
than twice ;-)
My problem is, that I have to write to both tapes simultaneously
Ryan Novosielski wrote:
> Chris Hoogendyk wrote:
>
>> Ryan Novosielski wrote:
>>
>>> Chris Hoogendyk wrote:
>>>
Attila Fülöp wrote:
> Kern Sibbald wrote:
>
>> On Monday 30 July 2007 17:29, Ryan Novosielski wrote:
>>
Another update: I changed the record in the database to reflect the way
the barcode reads the volume, and it seems to be recognized, however, it
is listed as LTO2 and as such, the library can not find a suitable
device to read the tape. Although LTO3 can read LTO2 tapes. Has this
been addressed in
Robert LeBlanc would like to recall the message, "[Bacula-users] Moving to new
library".
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop.
Now Search log events and conf
> Instead, however, I get this:
>
> *
> *mes
> 31-Jul 16:14 gemini-dir: Start Backup JobId 4719,
> Job=dns-france.france.u4eatech.com.2007-07-31_16.14.38
> 31-Jul 16:14 gemini-dir: Created new Volume "Daily-DLT-0006" in catalog.
> 31-Jul 16:14 taranis-sd: Please mount Volume "Daily-DLT-0006" on Sto
(re-sent because I sent it to the -bounces address - oops)
Hi,
I want to set up Bacula to automatically label any blank volumes. The
volumes in question are DLT tapes, using a plain tape drive (no
autochanger).
The director's configuration is slightly complicated by the fact that
there are t
More info on this. I put one of the old tapes in the new library and the
barcode reader reads it differently then the old one does. The new
library attaches L2 to the volume name. I would guess if this is not the
case then Bacula would not have a problem. So before I go through the
database and ren
Hello,
As I have mentioned several times, we are nearing the end of stabilizing the
next release (I consider the current 2.1.28 beta pretty good). There are
still a few bugs open on the current code, but they should be resolved
shortly, if they are not already fixed.
What remains is a bit mor
Hi Frank,
Sorry for only checking my mail now.
Nope, the BKF file gets created every evening and there are no issues
insofar the Windows side (Sucsessfull creation + Integrity check).
PS: 440Gb available on drive.
Bacula starts the job and then terminates with the "Insufficient System
Resources
On Tue, July 31, 2007 2:36 pm, David Romerstein wrote:
> On Tue, 31 Jul 2007, Troy Daniels wrote:
>
>> Just curious, but is there a reason you did it this way around instead
>> of
>> having a 'ClientRunBeforeJob' script launch the dump process from within
>> Bacula?
>>
>> You end up with the same
Jason King wrote:
> I've got 10 tapes in a rotation. The tapes backup until they are full,
> once they are full I get a notification telling me to insert the next
> tape. It's a really simple setup. The problem I'm having is that once
> tape 10 is full, it wants to rotate back to tape 1 (which i
I've got 10 tapes in a rotation. The tapes backup until they are full,
once they are full I get a notification telling me to insert the next
tape. It's a really simple setup. The problem I'm having is that once
tape 10 is full, it wants to rotate back to tape 1 (which it is suppose
to do), and
On Tue, 31 Jul 2007, Troy Daniels wrote:
> Just curious, but is there a reason you did it this way around instead of
> having a 'ClientRunBeforeJob' script launch the dump process from within
> Bacula?
>
> You end up with the same result in the end I guess and I was wondering if
> there was mor
Hello,
it will run forewer if you don't create indexes. You better stop it
(also make sure the sql query is stopped as this was not a case here)
and then do something that Frank Alpeter posted once here, I'll quote
him:
---
I'm running dbcheck periodically every sunday with the following script:
On 7/31/07, Mair Wolfgang-awm013 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I started the DB check yesterday morning. It is still running. How long
> does this usually take? Or am I doing something wrong?
>
This depends on how big your database, what type of database and if it
is properly indexed.
-
I started the DB check yesterday morning. It is still running. How long
does this usually take? Or am I doing something wrong?
Wolfgang
-Original Message-
From: Julien [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 30, 2007 10:22
To: Mair Wolfgang-awm013
Cc: Doytchin Spiridonov; bacula-us
>On Tue, 24 Jul 2007 00:48:28 +0200, you wrote:
>Hi,
>
>23.07.2007 23:36,, George R.Kasica wrote::
>>> On Mon, 23 Jul 2007 21:08:36 +0200, you wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> 23.07.2007 20:33,, George R.Kasica wrote::
Hello:
I'm sure this is a simple fix, but I'm missing something in the
On Monday 30 July 2007 22:35, Martin Simmons wrote:
> > On Mon, 30 Jul 2007 19:27:43 +0200, Kern Sibbald said:
> >
> > On Monday 30 July 2007 19:16, Martin Simmons wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 30 Jul 2007 16:48:09 +0200, Kern Sibbald said:
> > > >
> > > > On Sunday 29 July 2007 19:28, Ryan Novo
30 matches
Mail list logo
