On 12/28/19 5:11 PM, Aris Merchant via agora-discussion wrote:
I seem to recall hearing once about an incident where a person
attempted to register as a player twice concurrently under different
names. Does anyone know where that precedent can be found? It's
relevant to a thesis that I'm thinking
On 12/28/19 3:49 PM, Edward Murphy via agora-business wrote:
~~~
Each of the following messages was effectively sent to the Public Forum
on or about the Date: stamp shown in the archives. Claims within these
messages (in particular, claims to perform actions) may still be
ineffective for other re
On 12/19/19 1:38 AM, Aris Merchant wrote:
For this decision, the vote collector is the Assessor, the
quorum is 3
I think quorum was 4, since 8276 had 6 voters; although I don't think it
actually matters whether it was 3 or 4, since 4 people voted.
--
Jason Cobb
On 12/29/19 4:39 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
That's the exact reason is why R1030 is written that way - R1030 prevents
the rule from "getting into the ruleset" in the first place. When you
say "precedence over all rules" it's a straightforward precedence claim
of the sort that's
On 12/29/19 10:26 PM, Jason Cobb via agora-official wrote:
I earn 5 coins for publishing the most recent Rulekeepor's weekly report.
I earn 5 coins for publishing the most recent Rulekeepor's monthly report.
Sorry about that going to OFF; force of habit, I suppose.
--
Jason Cobb
On 12/29/19 10:30 PM, Ørjan Johansen via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Sun, 29 Dec 2019, Jason Cobb via agora-official wrote:
>
>> THE FULL LOGICAL RULESET
> You forgot to strip trailing spaces, so these again have that
> format=flowed problem.
>
> Greetings,
> Ørjan.
Gah, apparently email is har
On 1/1/20 12:47 AM, Gaelan Steele via agora-discussion wrote:
> TTtt goddamn PF
>
> Gaelan
NttPF.
--
Jason Cobb
On 1/7/20 6:10 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
> (2) dividing the ruleset itself so that rule categories
> are more binding, and rules precedence works as "category then power"
> (e.g. any rule in the "economy" category has precedence over
> "non-economy" category when it comes to coins
On 1/7/20 4:13 PM, Aris Merchant via agora-discussion wrote:
> H. Assessor, I'm sorry for leaving you with a mess; if there's
> anything the Promotor's office can do to help, let me know.
>
> -Aris
I don't think there are any problems left right now. The resolutions
should self-ratify in a few da
Seems reasonable to me.
On Wed, Jan 8, 2020, 12:09 PM Aris Merchant via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 7, 2020 at 8:24 PM Aris Merchant
> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 7, 2020 at 3:12 PM Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jan 7
On 1/8/20 12:08 PM, Aris Merchant via agora-discussion wrote:
>> Each officer has the power to, with notice, issue a memorandum,
>> which shall consist in a public document and shall, once issued,
>> have the power to resolve bindingly any matter within eir official area of
>> concern, inso
On 1/8/20 5:42 PM, AIS523--- via agora-discussion wrote:
> I have an automatic uneasy reaction to anything that inherently needs
> to be able to platonically evaluate arbitrary conditions that can be
> specified without going through a proposal process or the like,
> especially if there are no requ
On 1/9/20 2:11 AM, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
> By including "purposeful", it covers scams; e.g. with Jason Cobb's 18,000
> coins - the scammer would have at least the 4 day objection period to enjoy
> eir earnings or convert it to a win[*] or whatever.
>
> [*]since winning and patent
On 1/9/20 11:22 AM, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
> Jason Cobb wrote:
>> Sorry, but 4 days doesn't seem like enough here. If there's a CFJ on the
>> scam, then even if everyone is acting LEGALLY, it could take up to two
>> weeks to get a judgement. During that time, the scammer would have
On 1/10/20 9:48 PM, James Cook wrote:
> Is this intended to be along the same lines as Trigon's "Interesting
> Chambers" proto from September? (Subject lines: "Proto for a new
> voting/chamber system" and "Interesting Chambers v2".)
>
> Your proposal is interesting. How did you imagine these being
On 1/11/20 12:13 AM, James Cook wrote:
> Oh right, yes, that would be nice.
>
> I'm confused about a couple of things:
>
> * A module has a list of dependencies (does that mean "things that
> depend on it"?), and each rule has a "Parent". Are "Parents" the same
> thing as "dependencies"? Can module
On 1/12/20 4:26 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-official wrote:
> The below CFJ is 3790. I assign it to G..
>
> status: https://faculty.washington.edu/kerim/nomic/cases/#3790
>
> === CFJ 3790 ===
>
> The sending of this message (the entire
On 1/12/20 5:36 PM, Alexis Hunt via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Sun, 12 Jan 2020 at 11:12, Kerim Aydin via agora-business <
> agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
>> Like with [Proposal], please put/edit [CFJ] into subject lines
>> when you call a CFJ, if you think about it :).
>>
> I can appre
On 1/12/20 10:14 PM, James Cook via agora-discussion wrote:
> On the other hand, I haven't been very creative with the office. Even
> my election-just-to-get-a-ribbon plan is simply copying the H. Arbitor
> and Assessor, who did it in November. Are you planning to do something
> interesting if you
On 1/13/20 5:58 AM, Timon Walshe-Grey via agora-discussion wrote:
> I agree that it would be good to have some way of giving officers extra
> votes on relevant proposals - this was also the goal of Trigon's
> "Interesting Chambers" proto - but I'm not sure that this system is
> workable in practice
On 1/13/20 6:06 PM, Alexis Hunt via agora-business wrote:
> I initiate an election for Referee.
By what method?
--
Jason Cobb
On 1/16/20 9:39 PM, Alexis Hunt via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Jan 2020 at 19:38, AIS523--- via agora-discussion <
> agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 2020-01-16 at 15:05 -0800, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion
>> wrote:
>>> Now here we are a third time. Whatever we ca
On 1/16/20 10:45 PM, Aris Merchant via agora-discussion wrote:
> -
> Title: The Reset Button v2
> Adoption index: 3.0
> Author: Aris
> Co-authors: G.
>
>
> Create the following power 3.0 rule entitled "The Reset Button":
>
On 1/16/20 11:11 PM, Aris Merchant via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 16, 2020 at 7:53 PM Jason Cobb via agora-discussion
> wrote:
>
>> I like the ideas, as I've said before (although I haven't yet thoroughly
>> combed through these drafts for any bugs). One
On 1/16/20 10:45 PM, Aris Merchant via agora-discussion wrote:
> Title: Consolidated Regulatory Recordkeeping
> Adoption index: 3.0
> Author: Aris
> Co-authors:
>
> [The Rulekeepor is willing to take on this responsibility, and it
> makes considerably more sense than making the officer include a ra
Full disclosure, I think the bug that this fixes could be used for a
scam attempt similar to the 18K scam. Specifically, I believe a person
could find an office that missed a report a while ago, and then
repeatedly deputise for it, earning a Cyan ribbon an arbitrary number of
times.
I just want t
On 1/18/20 10:07 PM, Alexis Hunt wrote:
>
> I don't think you're correct; the first condition of rule 2160 is that
> the officer is required to perform the action. You would need to set
> this up would be if you could create a way that the officer could
> perform the action without discharging the
On 1/19/20 10:39 AM, Timon Walshe-Grey via agora-business wrote:
> and SHALL before the end
> of the next Agoran week, grant the associated set of assets to the
> player.
I don't think this is an actual requirement. According to Rule 2141, "a
rule [...] is always taking effect", which
On 1/18/20 11:07 PM, Alexis Hunt via agora-discussion wrote:
> Ah, I see where we were thinking differently. Yes, I think your idea works
> then, so long as it happens earlier in the week before the officer
> publishes the report and the obligation is live. Once the report is
> published, the oblig
On 1/20/20 4:46 PM, James Cook wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Jan 2020 at 03:29, Jason Cobb via agora-official
> wrote:
>> PROPOSAL 8286 (I Forbid Vetos!)
>> FOR (3): Aris, Falsifian, twg
>> AGAINST (6): Alexis, G., Gaelan, Jason Cobb, Rance, o
>> PRESENT (0):
>> BALLOTS: 9
>> AI (F/A): 9/18 (AI=1.0)
>> OUTC
On 1/21/20 10:54 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 1/21/2020 7:21 PM, Jason Cobb via agora-business wrote:
>> Well, now that the CFJs from the Troubles have been assigned, I have one
>> that I've wanted to do for a little while:
>>
>>
>> CFJ: "Coming into existence is a regulated act
On 1/21/20 11:06 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
> Actually you might want to re-call this with different phrasing. You can
> ask if a game-object (not sure if that's the right word) coming into
> existence is a regulated action, but your phrasing suggests that anything
> coming into e
On 1/20/20 10:22 PM, Aris Merchant via agora-official wrote:
> //
> ID: 8299
> Title: The Reset Button v2
> Adoption index: 3.0
> Author: Aris
> Co-authors: G.
>
> If no proposal whose title contains the text "Administrative Adjudi
On 1/25/20 9:55 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-official wrote:
> The below CFJ is 3788. I assign it to Jason Cobb.
>
> status: https://faculty.washington.edu/kerim/nomic/cases/#3788
>
> === CFJ 3788 ===
>
> If the two documents quoted abov
On 1/25/20 10:04 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-official wrote:
> The below CFJ is 3797. I assign it to Falsifian.
>
> status: https://faculty.washington.edu/kerim/nomic/cases/#3797
>
> === CFJ 3797 ===
>
> Coming into existence is a regul
On 1/25/20 8:32 PM, Alexis Hunt via agora-discussion wrote:
> Amend Rule 2125 (Regulated Actions) to read:
> {
> An action is regulated by a body of law if (1) its performance is
> limited, allowed, enabled, or permitted by that body of law; (2) that
> body of law describes the circumstances under
On 1/25/20 10:31 PM, Aris Merchant via agora-discussion wrote:
> Thank you! Thank you! You have no idea how much easier this makes to fit in
> the authors on a proposal distribution.
>
> (Please, no one respond by being contrary and expanding their Agoran name.)
>
> -Aris
That was a stronger reac
On 1/28/20 2:14 PM, Aris Merchant via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 12:03 AM omd via agora-discussion
> wrote:
>
>> I suppose I could mirror the archives on GitHub, which would be less
>> idiosyncratic and more resilient to me getting hit by a bus. That
>> would, however, impl
Rule 991 states:
> At any time, each CFJ is either open (default), suspended, or
> assigned exactly one judgement.
What exactly does it mean for a CFJ to be "assigned exactly one
judgement"? Specifically, does this include judgements that are not
listed as "valid judgements" by Rule
On 1/28/20 11:12 PM, omd via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 7:47 PM Jason Cobb via agora-business
> wrote:
>> I earn 5 coins for assessing a proposal.
> You can't, because P8295 made it so the ADoP has to do this. (And is
> also broken, so nobody can do it.)
Well, dammit.
--
On 1/29/20 1:45 PM, Timon Walshe-Grey via agora-discussion wrote:
> Jason Cobb wrote:
>> RESOLUTION OF PROPOSALS 8287-8307
>> =
>>
>> I hereby resolve the Agoran decisions to adopt the below proposals.
> NB: The F/A ratios on several of Proposals 8292-8307, and on th
On 1/28/20 10:26 PM, Jason Cobb via agora-official wrote:
> Amend Rule 2438 ("Ribbons") as follows:
>
> Replace the paragraph starting "While a person qualifies..." with
> the following:
I know this is probably unnecessarily pedantic, but does this work with
the "..." being inside the quotati
On 1/29/20 7:27 PM, Aris Merchant via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 4:23 PM Jason Cobb via agora-discussion
> wrote:
>> On 1/28/20 10:26 PM, Jason Cobb via agora-official wrote:
>>> Amend Rule 2438 ("Ribbons") as follows:
>>>
>&
On 1/30/20 1:31 AM, Aris Merchant via agora-discussion wrote:
> For rule cleanings, it would be nice (IMHO) to have who cleaned the rule be
> part of the annotation, for the historical record. One could tack something
> like “on the application of ” onto the end of the annotation so
> that we’d kno
On 1/30/20 8:32 AM, Jason Cobb wrote:
> Alright, fine. CoE on each resolution for a proposal with number not
> less than 8292, as well as 8290: they're wrong. For the next seven
> days, I pledge not to deny any of these CoEs.
>
> Updated assessments coming... eventually. I have to update my
> autom
On 1/30/20 10:21 AM, James Cook wrote:
> Shouldn't you also say that you resolve these decisions? My
> understanding is that you're not publishing a report here; you're
> re-taking some by-announcement actions in case your first attempt at
> those actions failed.
>
> - Falsifian
You're probably r
During research for CFJ 3888, I discovered that there appears to have
been a bug ... somewhere in the history.
>From the (arbitrarily selected) text of CFJ 2991 in the Github backup [0]:
>
> Request for reconsideration by :
On 1/30/20 11:20 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
> So, this is from the era of the mysql database. The mysql database actually
> had fields like "Caller" and "Judge" as lookups. This was looked up live when
> you queried the database for a case. One place this was used was nickname
On 1/25/20 9:55 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-official wrote:
> The below CFJ is 3788. I assign it to Jason Cobb.
>
> status: https://faculty.washington.edu/kerim/nomic/cases/#3788
>
> === CFJ 3788 ===
>
> If the two documents quoted abov
On 1/31/20 11:22 AM, Gaelan Steele via agora-discussion wrote:
> I Grumble Very Loudly, withdraw *that* CFJ, and submit the following one, now
> wrapped at 68 (and, as an additional safety, uses ES6’s ` strings which
> should work across lines): {
> G really ought to make sure the string (window.
On 1/31/20 3:42 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
> For the record, I just sent the case assignment message, it tripped my
> spam filter on the return so dunno if enough people will see the
> assignment to make it public :)
I got it.
--
Jason Cobb
On 2/1/20 12:09 AM, James Cook wrote:
> Are we sure the first attempt at resolving the decisions didn't
> succeed? I've lost track.
>
> In case we're a the situation like Alexis outlined, where the first
> succeeds platonically and this one succeeds via self-ratification, I
> tried to work out what
NttPF.
--
Jason Cobb
On 1/31/20 8:50 AM, Tanner Swett via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 30, 2020, 22:37 Alexis Hunt via agora-official <
> agora-offic...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
>> I intend, with 2 Agoran Consent, to award twg the Patent Title of Associate
>> of Nomic, subject to the c
On 2/1/20 5:24 PM, James Cook via agora-business wrote:
> 8310& Jason, Alexis3.0 Deputisation timeliness
> AGAIST --- Wouldn't let me deputise for a vacant office to perform an
> action unrelated to the office?
Err... yes, yes it would. That's not good. (No, this wasn't a scam.)
-
On 2/1/20 5:33 PM, Timon Walshe-Grey via agora-business wrote:
>> 8310& Jason, Alexis3.0 Deputisation timeliness
> PRESENT. Seems inoffensive, but I haven't been paying attention to the
> discussion about why it's necessary. Also it's one of those proposals
> that requires me to pain
On 2/1/20 6:25 PM, James Cook wrote:
> Comments inline. I think I agree with the gist of this, but there are
> parts I'm confused about, and also, I don't quite buy one of your
> arguments (but it could be because I'm confused).
>
You're probably confused because, in hindsight, the draft wasn't ve
On 2/1/20 7:14 PM, Aris Merchant via agora-discussion wrote:
> No worries, it happens to all of us. That's why we have review
> mechanisms in place. The review of others is the best way of catching
> errors, and everyone makes an error from time to time. Your legal
> reasoning is generally very goo
On 2/1/20 7:20 PM, James Cook wrote:
> I submit a proposal as follows:
>
> Title: Unrepetition
> AI: 3
> Chamber: Efficiency
Perhaps the H. Promotor should order this first in the batch so that the
other proposals have a definite ruleset to work with? If not, I'll try
to remember to resolve it fi
On 2/1/20 7:05 PM, Jason Cobb wrote:
> On 2/1/20 6:57 PM, Aris Merchant via agora-business wrote:
>> I intend, with 2 support, to group-file a motion to reconsider.
> I self-file a motion to reconsider in CFJ 3788.
>
>
Alright, a less insane and non-procrastinated draft judgement that I can
leave
On 2/2/20 9:15 PM, omd via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 2, 2020 at 6:01 PM comex wrote:
>> Now testing if Haraka can deliver to everyone.
> ...except that didn't actually use Haraka because I sent from the
> wrong address. This time for real.
Received, if it helps.
--
Jason Cobb
On 2/6/20 12:02 PM, James Cook wrote:
> It's not clear to me your judgement would break self-ratification of
> switch reports. Aris's documents were written in an unusual way: they
> said that at some earlier date, the values of two switch instances
> changed. Self-ratifying switch reports generall
On 2/6/20 1:41 PM, James Cook via agora-business wrote:
> least one week since this rule was last amended, then any player
> CAN repeal this rule by announcement.
Per Rule 105, only Instruments can cause rule changes, and persons are
not Instruments.
--
Jason Cobb
On 2/6/20 1:49 PM, James Cook wrote:
> Title: Blink test v1.1
> AI: 1
> Chamber: Legislation
> Text: {
>
> Amend Rule 2601 to read in full:
>
> If this is the only sentence in this rule, and it has been at
> least one week since this rule was last amended, then any player
> CAN Cl
On 2/6/20 7:47 PM, Alexis Hunt via agora-business wrote:
> "I intend, with Agoran consent, to enact the following Editorial Guidelines:"
>
> does not seem like multiple separate intents.
Whoops, you're right. I was thinking the rule said CAN enact a
(singular) Guideline, not CAN enact (plural) Gu
On 2/6/20 7:26 PM, Timon Walshe-Grey via agora-business wrote:
> I object to the lists one because the example given is very confusing.
> It's not an inline list because it's separated from the surrounding
> prose, and it's not a block list because the elements aren't separated
> by line breaks. An
On 2/7/20 12:07 AM, Aris Merchant via agora-discussion wrote:
>> Thanks! I added it because Aris suggested some interpretive element
>> would be nice in the weekly summaries. Seems like a good payoff for
>> not much extra effort.
> Yeah, I really do like it! It somehow changes the character of the
On 2/7/20 1:35 AM, Luke Tyler via agora-business wrote:
>> 8308& Falsifian3.0 Imposing order on the order
> PRESENT
>
>> 8309* Alexis 3.0 A Degree of Inefficiency
> AGAINST
>
I'm sorry, I believe you missed the cutoff by a few hours.
--
Jason Cobb
On 2/8/20 12:10 PM, James Cook via agora-discussion wrote:
> * You can make one-party contracts now. (The Rulekeepor hasn't caught
> up with that one yet, but it's "Contract Patency v3" in last week's
> proposal resolution [0].)
The data files are updated for the last resolutions, but I think at
On 2/8/20 7:11 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-business wrote:
> [5] https://faculty.washington.edu/kerim/nomic/cases/?3773 found that
> future-dated reports are inaccurate by nature (too inaccurate to be considered
> a report).
Didn't that CFJ find that I could be punished "for publishing, as part
of
Because there hasn't been an ADoP report in over a month (I hope
Murphy's okay), I'd just like to confirm office holdings because the
assessments depend on it:
The latest report is at [0]. As far as I know, the changes from then are:
* Herald is held by Alexis.
* Prime Minister is held by Ale
On 2/9/20 1:48 PM, Edward Murphy via agora-business wrote:
> If Notary does not have Ministry set, then I set it to {Economy}.
I believe you can only do this without objection, per Proposal 8291's
rule "ministries".
--
Jason Cobb
Because this is the first distribution with ministries (and my code
probably contains bugs), here's a draft resolution. (I've already hand
checked the voting strengths, bu I could have missed something).
RESOLUTION OF PROPOSALS 8308-8321
=
I hereby resolve the Ago
On 2/9/20 6:42 PM, Alexis Hunt via agora-discussion wrote:
> The original AI was 2 when it was submitted. Noticing this error
> within the week of distribution would invalidate it for lack of
> clarity, but it's self-ratified, so I believe it's properly
> distributed at AI=2 now.
>
> -Alexis
I th
On 2/9/20 7:14 PM, Alexis Hunt via agora-business wrote:
> * Assessor, as I'm dissatisfied with the sparse content of resolutions;
What other content would you like in the resolutions? I'll also point
out there is more information at https://agoranomic.org/assessor/ since
I try to keep the messag
On 2/9/20 7:29 PM, Alexis Hunt via agora-discussion wrote:
> I would absolutely prefer to see the full version from that site
> posted to the mailing lists as it makes it much easier to work out.
> Last time I mentioned conditional votes I believe you didn't mention
> this site, and that was defini
On 2/10/20 10:33 PM, Edward Murphy via agora-business wrote:
> If the author's proposal "Clarify quorum (option 2)" has been or
> would be adopted with a greater or equal proportion of support, then
> this proposal has no effect. Otherwise:
This should probably say "(option 1)" instead of "(optio
On 2/11/20 2:04 AM, Aris Merchant via agora-discussion wrote:
> H. Assessor, the Promotorial Proposal Office is tentatively holding off on
> distributing the next round of proposals until the current round is
> resolved. In particular, we believe that it would be advantageous for the
> Proposal 832
On 2/12/20 10:18 PM, Aris Merchant via agora-official wrote:
> ID Author(s)AITitle
> ---
> 8322* Falsifian, Alexis, twg 3.0 Unrepetition v1.1
> 8323* Jason3.0 Secure Ribbons
>
On 2/13/20 12:00 AM, Aris Merchant via agora-business wrote:
> Fucking hell. I didn't even fix the numbers. I'm so stressed out about
> my mistake that I only fixed half the problem. I am so sorry everyone.
> This is truly mortifying.
It's alright! I have no complaints about the work you've done
On 2/12/20 9:17 PM, Jason Cobb via agora-official wrote:
> PROPOSAL 8317 (Zombie trade)
> FOR (5): Alexis%, Bernie, Gaelan, omd, twg&
> AGAINST (6): Aris, Falsifian$, G., Jason, Rance, o
> PRESENT (0):
> BALLOTS: 11
> AI (F/A): 21/19 (AI=1.0)
> OUTCOME: ADOPTED
Out of curiosity, what the reward
On 2/14/20 12:59 PM, Timon Walshe-Grey via agora-business wrote:
> *sigh*
>
> CFJ, barring Falsifian: "Falsifian was awarded a Red Ribbon today."
>
> Arguments:
>
> Rule 2438 says:
>
> Red (R): When a proposal is adopted and changes at least one rule
> that, immediately before or after
Getting some failure notices for a certain message, I want to see if
it's only for that message.
--
Jason Cobb
On 2/14/20 2:25 PM, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
> Getting some failure notices for a certain message, I want to see if
> it's only for that message.
>
> -- Jason Cobb
Looks like it is, since I got this back (w/o failure notice).
--
Jason Cobb
On 2/14/20 2:12 PM, Timon Walshe-Grey via agora-business wrote:
>> 8323* Jason3.0 Secure Ribbons
> Conditional: AGAINST if Jason votes AGAINST; otherwise PRESENT.
> Undeniably a good idea, but I can't quite bring myself to give up on
> such a juicy scam target.
>
[Apologies
On 2/14/20 2:26 PM, Jason Cobb wrote:
> On 2/14/20 2:25 PM, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
>> Getting some failure notices for a certain message, I want to see if
>> it's only for that message.
>>
>> -- Jason Cobb
>
> Looks like it is, since I got
On 2/15/20 9:39 AM, Tanner Swett via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 14, 2020, 14:12 Timon Walshe-Grey via agora-business <
> agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
>>> 8331j Warrigal 1.7 Promissory cleanliness
>> Conditional: AGAINST if Warrigal votes AGAINST; otherwise P
On 2/17/20 3:14 AM, Timon Walshe-Grey via agora-business wrote:
> Jason wrote:
>> Since there was apparently no actual zombie auction, I still have Rance.
>> I cause Rance to vote to ENDORSE me in every Agoran decision on whether
>> to adopt a proposal currently in its voting period.
> Oh, right. I
On 2/17/20 6:47 PM, Alexis Hunt via agora-discussion wrote:
> I think I missed something. Why does broken zombie auctions mean that
> you own the zombies?
I only reset Rance's master if there was an ongoing zombie auctino [0].
[0]:
https://mailman.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-bus
On 2/17/20 6:47 PM, Alexis Hunt via agora-discussion wrote:
> I think I missed something. Why does broken zombie auctions mean that
> you own the zombies?
I only reset Rance's master if there was an ongoing zombie auction [0].
[0]:
https://mailman.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-bus
On 2/17/20 6:58 PM, Jason Cobb wrote:
> I only reset Rance's master if there was an ongoing zombie auction [0].
Whoops, looks like that sent twice. Sorry.
--
Jason Cobb
On 2/17/20 8:07 PM, Timon Walshe-Grey via agora-discussion wrote:
> Jason wrote:
>> Hmm... Seeing as I have never previously owned a White Ribbon, I award
>> myself White Glitter.
> To be eligible for Glitter of any colour you need to have owned that
> Ribbon within the past 7 days (that's what the
On 2/17/20 9:21 PM, Alexis Hunt via agora-discussion wrote:
>> I award myself Platinum glitter.
> I don't believe this works because one cannot earn Platinum Ribbons;
> they are only qualified for.
>
> -Alexis
The latest language in R2438 is:
> While a person qualifies for a type of Ribbon
On 2/18/20 2:27 PM, James Cook wrote:
> You can use the word "grant" as defined by rule 2577. E.g. "A person
> CAN grant emself a specified number of blots by announcement.".
Sure, but I don't think that's worth retracting and resubmitting the
proposal.
--
Jason Cobb
On 2/18/20 2:49 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
>
> On 2/18/2020 11:43 AM, James Cook via agora-discussion wrote:
>> On Tue, 18 Feb 2020 at 19:04, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion
>> wrote:
>>> On 2/18/2020 10:45 AM, James Cook via agora-discussion wrote:
For the purpose of
On 2/18/20 2:00 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 2/18/2020 10:45 AM, James Cook via agora-discussion wrote:
>> For the purpose of such a auction, to transfer a zombie to a
>> player is to set that zombie's master switch to that player, and
>> Agora CAN transfer zom
On 2/18/20 4:52 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-business wrote:
>> 8323* Jason3.0 Secure Ribbons
> AGAINST. I think it's already de-facto secured because you have to modify
> the Ribbons rule to add ribbons. The text: "The types of Ribbon, and the
> methods of obtaining them, ar
On 2/19/20 10:20 AM, Kerim Aydin via agora-official wrote:
> The below CFJ is 3810. I assign it to Jason.
>
> status: https://faculty.washington.edu/kerim/nomic/cases/#3810
>
> === CFJ 3810 ===
>
> It is generally POSSIBLE to act on b
On 2/19/20 9:38 PM, James Cook wrote:
> I have the same question here as in another thread [0]: since awarding
> a ribbon is a regulated action, does this rule need to explicitly
> specify a mechanism that it's using to award the ribbon (or explicitly
> override R2125)?
>
> [0]
> https://mailman.a
On 2/20/20 6:08 PM, Gaelan Steele via agora-discussion wrote:
> I’ll start with the second question. It appears that the version of the rule
> in question there was 8139/20. (The court admonishes G. for failing to
> include revision numbers in his rule citations, by the way.) The current
> rule,
On 2/20/20 7:08 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
> So when R1742 was re-implemented (replacing R2520-2527), we still ended up
> with "Agora = agreement" and "contract = agreement" but the link "Agora =
> contract", while not inconsistent with the R1742 text, was never re-created.
>
> -G.
1 - 100 of 689 matches
Mail list logo
