Re: DIS: Re: OFF: CFJ 1828a: recuse, assign Levi, Murphy, root

2008-01-14 Thread Levi Stephen
Ian Kelly wrote: On Jan 14, 2008 3:51 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Levi wrote: Is it worth considering the decision that was almost made before for this appeal? Yes, I had forgotten about this. (I wasn't on the panel at the time, so I just filed it away in case it led to an actua

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: CFJ 1828a: recuse, assign Levi, Murphy, root

2008-01-14 Thread Ian Kelly
On Jan 14, 2008 3:51 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Levi wrote: > > > Is it worth considering the decision that was almost made before for > > this appeal? > > Yes, I had forgotten about this. (I wasn't on the panel at the time, > so I just filed it away in case it led to an actual pan

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: CFJ 1828a: recuse, assign Levi, Murphy, root

2008-01-14 Thread Ed Murphy
Levi wrote: Is it worth considering the decision that was almost made before for this appeal? Yes, I had forgotten about this. (I wasn't on the panel at the time, so I just filed it away in case it led to an actual panel action.) Having considered it more carefully, I stand by my opinion tha

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: CFJ 1828a: recuse, assign Levi, Murphy, root

2008-01-14 Thread Levi Stephen
Ed Murphy wrote: root wrote: On Jan 14, 2008 9:15 AM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I intend to cause the panel to judge REASSIGN, on the basis that comex apparently did not make the reasonable effort to ask pikhq whether the alleged event occurred. I would prefer REMAND. There's no

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: CFJ 1828a: recuse, assign Levi, Murphy, root

2008-01-14 Thread comex
On Jan 14, 2008 11:15 AM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Zefram wrote: > > > Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=1828a > > I intend to cause the panel to judge REASSIGN, on the basis that > comex apparently did not make the reasonable effort to ask pikhq > whether the

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: CFJ 1828a: recuse, assign Levi, Murphy, root

2008-01-14 Thread Ed Murphy
root wrote: On Jan 14, 2008 9:15 AM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I intend to cause the panel to judge REASSIGN, on the basis that comex apparently did not make the reasonable effort to ask pikhq whether the alleged event occurred. I would prefer REMAND. There's no reason the origina

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: CFJ 1828a: recuse, assign Levi, Murphy, root

2008-01-14 Thread Ian Kelly
On Jan 14, 2008 9:15 AM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I intend to cause the panel to judge REASSIGN, on the basis that > comex apparently did not make the reasonable effort to ask pikhq > whether the alleged event occurred. I would prefer REMAND. There's no reason the original judge cou

DIS: Re: OFF: CFJ 1828a: recuse, assign Levi, Murphy, root

2008-01-14 Thread Ed Murphy
Zefram wrote: Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=1828a I intend to cause the panel to judge REASSIGN, on the basis that comex apparently did not make the reasonable effort to ask pikhq whether the alleged event occurred.