On Jan 14, 2008 3:51 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Levi wrote: > > > Is it worth considering the decision that was almost made before for > > this appeal? > > Yes, I had forgotten about this. (I wasn't on the panel at the time, > so I just filed it away in case it led to an actual panel action.) > > Having considered it more carefully, I stand by my opinion that comex > should have asked pikhq whether e performed the alleged action, but > agree that pikhq should also have provided that information without > having to be asked. I also believe that comex should investigate the > possibility that Steve Wallace is a representative of a nomic, in > which case sending a message to em may be tantamount to sending a > message to that nomic. > > Accordingly, I intend to cause the panel to judge REMAND (and I > pre-emptively consent to either Levi or root doing the same).
I consent to this. -root
