Levi wrote:
Is it worth considering the decision that was almost made before for this appeal?
Yes, I had forgotten about this. (I wasn't on the panel at the time, so I just filed it away in case it led to an actual panel action.) Having considered it more carefully, I stand by my opinion that comex should have asked pikhq whether e performed the alleged action, but agree that pikhq should also have provided that information without having to be asked. I also believe that comex should investigate the possibility that Steve Wallace is a representative of a nomic, in which case sending a message to em may be tantamount to sending a message to that nomic. Accordingly, I intend to cause the panel to judge REMAND (and I pre-emptively consent to either Levi or root doing the same).
