Peekee wrote:
> From the outside what counts as an action by Agora?
Heh. This is a stretch, but it's possible that the closest thing
to the undefined "unrestricted" access in R2147 is "unregulated"
access, in other words, to qualify as a protectorate, the nomic
must let any "Agoran" attempt to
I was not really expecting that to work. What I was trying to point
out is that Primo needs to define how Agora is allowed to alter its
charter.
I think it would be possible for there to be a protectorate with a
badly worded charter that allowed any post to Agora's public forum to
alter i
On 7/17/07, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
root wrote:
> TIASCOTC"ISIDTID"FTHPAFAVLT.
^ ?
Sorry, I thought everyone would know by now.
*ahem* "This is a straightforward case of the common "I say I do,
therefore I do" fallacy that has plagued Agora for a very long time."
-root
root wrote:
On 7/17/07, Peekee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On behalf of Agora I hereby repeal all rules, regulations, terms and
any and all other parts of the Primo Coporation and its charter. The
Primo Coporation no longer exists.
...
As Primo unconditionally allows Agora permission to chang
On 7/17/07, Peekee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On behalf of Agora I hereby repeal all rules, regulations, terms and
any and all other parts of the Primo Coporation and its charter. The
Primo Coporation no longer exists.
...
As Primo unconditionally allows Agora permission to change its charter
BobTHJ wrote:
> An Agoran Proposal has the ability to change any game document
> (at present) of which the Primo Corp charter is one.
But agreements, as "game documents", have special status. Agoran
Rules are a sub-class of agreement, not the other way around. Of
particular interest here is R1
On 7/17/07, Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Saying it doesn't make it so. Primo's charter doesn't define any way to
determine that Agora wishes to change the charter, and so can't implement
changing the charter at Agora's behest. Of course, Agoran rules can
modify the Primo charter by virtue
Roger Hicks wrote:
>Quoting from Section 1 of the charter:
Saying it doesn't make it so. Primo's charter doesn't define any way to
determine that Agora wishes to change the charter, and so can't implement
changing the charter at Agora's behest. Of course, Agoran rules can
modify the Primo charte
On 7/17/07, Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Roger Hicks wrote:
>You will find the correct verbiage in Section #1.
However, it doesn't actually specify a mechanism by which Agora can make
changes to its ruleset, so I think it's not actually allowing Agora to
make changes, the statement in secti
Roger Hicks wrote:
>You will find the correct verbiage in Section #1.
However, it doesn't actually specify a mechanism by which Agora can make
changes to its ruleset, so I think it's not actually allowing Agora to
make changes, the statement in section 1 notwithstanding. I don't think
it ever qua
On 7/17/07, Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
As required by Rule 2148/0, I have reviewed Primo Corporation and find
that it does not currently meet the requirements of a Protectorate, if
it ever did so. Specifically, it does not "specify in its ruleset
that it submits to Agora as its be
On 7/17/07, Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
---
LIST OF PROTECTORATES
---
None
Primo Corp is a protectorate. Also, both B Nomic and Gunner Nomic 2.0
have become and then ceased to be Protectorates in the past month.
Bob
12 matches
Mail list logo
