On 7/17/07, Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Roger Hicks wrote:
>You will find the correct verbiage in Section #1.
However, it doesn't actually specify a mechanism by which Agora can make
changes to its ruleset, so I think it's not actually allowing Agora to
make changes, the statement in section 1 notwithstanding. I don't think
it ever qualified as a protectorate.
Quoting from Section 1 of the charter:
"This agreement submits to Agora as its benevolent protector, and
permits Agora to make changes to this Charter without prior consent of
the parties to this agreement."
It would seem to me that the language in question would allow Agora to
change the charter in any fashion it wished by any means.
BobTHJ
