Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Acting Grand Poobah] Deck of Government Report

2009-09-27 Thread Ed Murphy
Tiger wrote: > 2009/9/25 Sean Hunt : >> Roger Hicks wrote: >>> I act on behalf of Tiger to publish the following: >> I publish an NoV alleging that BobTHJ violated Rule 2215, a power-1 rule, by >> having made a public statement on a matter relevant to the rules (that e >> acts on behalf of Tiger)

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Acting Grand Poobah] Deck of Government Report

2009-09-27 Thread Jonatan Kilhamn
2009/9/25 Sean Hunt : > Roger Hicks wrote: >> >> I act on behalf of Tiger to publish the following: > > I publish an NoV alleging that BobTHJ violated Rule 2215, a power-1 rule, by > having made a public statement on a matter relevant to the rules (that e > acts on behalf of Tiger) without a reason

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Acting Grand Poobah] Deck of Government Report

2009-09-25 Thread Ed Murphy
BobTHJ wrote: > How does this not satisfy R2263(a)? Note the clauses of R2263 are ORed. Also note R2263(c) doesn't require specifying which public contract is enabling the action (though it's certainly a good idea to minimize disputes).

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Acting Grand Poobah] Deck of Government Report

2009-09-25 Thread Roger Hicks
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 14:40, Sean Hunt wrote: > Sean Hunt wrote: >> >> Roger Hicks wrote: >>> >>> I act on behalf of Tiger to publish the following: >> >> I publish an NoV alleging that BobTHJ violated Rule 2215, a power-1 rule, >> by having made a public statement on a matter relevant to the ru

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Acting Grand Poobah] Deck of Government Report

2009-09-25 Thread Sean Hunt
Sean Hunt wrote: Roger Hicks wrote: I act on behalf of Tiger to publish the following: I publish an NoV alleging that BobTHJ violated Rule 2215, a power-1 rule, by having made a public statement on a matter relevant to the rules (that e acts on behalf of Tiger) without a reasonable belief th