Tiger wrote: > 2009/9/25 Sean Hunt <ride...@gmail.com>: >> Roger Hicks wrote: >>> I act on behalf of Tiger to publish the following: >> I publish an NoV alleging that BobTHJ violated Rule 2215, a power-1 rule, by >> having made a public statement on a matter relevant to the rules (that e >> acts on behalf of Tiger) without a reasonable belief that it was true. >> >> Arguments: >> >> BobTHJ devised a contract to allow him to act on Tiger's behalf, but Tiger >> never agreed to it to a DF, and if he did, the contract was never made >> public in any case. A public contract is required for act-on-behalf, and >> there was no public contract and probably no contract at all that would >> authorize BobTHJ's actions. >> > I did agree to it, but the contract text was not published afterwards. > But hasn't there been cases of people acting on behalf permitted by > private contracts (the latest win by clout, for example)?
Those contracts were made public as part of the message that executed the win. Earlier instances may have pre-dated the rules requiring act-on-behalf contracts to be public.
