Sean Hunt wrote:
Roger Hicks wrote:
I act on behalf of Tiger to publish the following:

I publish an NoV alleging that BobTHJ violated Rule 2215, a power-1 rule, by having made a public statement on a matter relevant to the rules (that e acts on behalf of Tiger) without a reasonable belief that it was true.

Arguments:

BobTHJ devised a contract to allow him to act on Tiger's behalf, but Tiger never agreed to it to a DF, and if he did, the contract was never made public in any case. A public contract is required for act-on-behalf, and there was no public contract and probably no contract at all that would authorize BobTHJ's actions.

-coppro
Oh, irritating. I mis-searched and discovered Tiger did agree to a PF (weird). The report still fails for not mentioning the contract.

-coppro

Reply via email to