On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 14:40, Sean Hunt <ride...@gmail.com> wrote: > Sean Hunt wrote: >> >> Roger Hicks wrote: >>> >>> I act on behalf of Tiger to publish the following: >> >> I publish an NoV alleging that BobTHJ violated Rule 2215, a power-1 rule, >> by having made a public statement on a matter relevant to the rules (that e >> acts on behalf of Tiger) without a reasonable belief that it was true. >> >> Arguments: >> >> BobTHJ devised a contract to allow him to act on Tiger's behalf, but Tiger >> never agreed to it to a DF, and if he did, the contract was never made >> public in any case. A public contract is required for act-on-behalf, and >> there was no public contract and probably no contract at all that would >> authorize BobTHJ's actions. >> >> -coppro > > Oh, irritating. I mis-searched and discovered Tiger did agree to a PF > (weird). The report still fails for not mentioning the contract. > How does this not satisfy R2263(a)? Note the clauses of R2263 are ORed.
BobTHJ
