2009/9/25 Sean Hunt <ride...@gmail.com>: > Roger Hicks wrote: >> >> I act on behalf of Tiger to publish the following: > > I publish an NoV alleging that BobTHJ violated Rule 2215, a power-1 rule, by > having made a public statement on a matter relevant to the rules (that e > acts on behalf of Tiger) without a reasonable belief that it was true. > > Arguments: > > BobTHJ devised a contract to allow him to act on Tiger's behalf, but Tiger > never agreed to it to a DF, and if he did, the contract was never made > public in any case. A public contract is required for act-on-behalf, and > there was no public contract and probably no contract at all that would > authorize BobTHJ's actions. > I did agree to it, but the contract text was not published afterwards. But hasn't there been cases of people acting on behalf permitted by private contracts (the latest win by clout, for example)?
-- -Tiger
