On Mon, 2017-06-05 at 15:20 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> On Mon, 5 Jun 2017, Alex Smith wrote:
> > I'm starting to get the impression that basing an economy on proposal
> > pending never works. Sometimes, distributing a proposal is part of a
> > scam, and thus worth paying for / fighting over. Ho
On Mon, 2017-06-05 at 15:22 -0700, Aris Merchant wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 3:13 PM, Quazie wrote:
> > I withdraw all proposals i've submitted to the Proposal Competition
> > as the
> > thing just doesn't work and is currently a useless concept.
> >
> > I Encourage everyone to ignore the Pro
On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 3:23 PM Aris Merchant <
thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 3:13 PM, Quazie wrote:
> > I withdraw all proposals i've submitted to the Proposal Competition as
> the
> > thing just doesn't work and is currently a useless concept.
> >
> > I Enco
On Mon, 5 Jun 2017, Alex Smith wrote:
> I'm starting to get the impression that basing an economy on proposal
> pending never works. Sometimes, distributing a proposal is part of a
> scam, and thus worth paying for / fighting over. However, the majority
> of proposals are intended to be "for the
On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 3:13 PM, Quazie wrote:
> I withdraw all proposals i've submitted to the Proposal Competition as the
> thing just doesn't work and is currently a useless concept.
>
> I Encourage everyone to ignore the Proposal Competition.
>
Wait, don't be hasty. We haven't figured out how
On Mon, 2017-06-05 at 15:09 -0700, Aris Merchant wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 3:03 PM, Alex Smith wrote:
> > IIRC, the pending system worked rather differently when we invented
> > proposal competitions.
>
> Yeah. For everyone who doesn't know, we didn't have an economy until December.
The pr
On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 3:05 PM, Quazie wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 3:03 PM Alex Smith wrote:
>>
>> Proto: the pender of a proposal and the submitter must be different
>> people. When a proposal is pended, the pender gains some fraction of
>> the pend fee. (In my experience, preventing peopl
On 06/05/2017 05:03 PM, Alex Smith wrote:
I'm starting to get the impression that basing an economy on proposal
pending never works. Sometimes, distributing a proposal is part of a
scam, and thus worth paying for / fighting over. However, the majority
of proposals are intended to be "for the good
On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 3:03 PM, Alex Smith wrote:
> On Mon, 2017-06-05 at 21:53 +, Quazie wrote:
>> I thought the whole point of a proposal competition was to distribute a
>> bunch of proposals without paying for them. Proposal competitions are
>> apparently useless - darn.
>
> IIRC, the pend
On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 3:03 PM Alex Smith wrote:
> On Mon, 2017-06-05 at 21:53 +, Quazie wrote:
> > I thought the whole point of a proposal competition was to distribute a
> > bunch of proposals without paying for them. Proposal competitions are
> > apparently useless - darn.
>
> IIRC, the p
On Mon, 2017-06-05 at 21:53 +, Quazie wrote:
> I thought the whole point of a proposal competition was to distribute a
> bunch of proposals without paying for them. Proposal competitions are
> apparently useless - darn.
IIRC, the pending system worked rather differently when we invented
propo
On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 2:48 PM Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> And ... the issues begin, too. NOT ANY CFJs: I want to see if
> we can resolve these with discussion without mucking up the competition.
>
>
> 1. From R2431: "During the Agoran Week following the initiation of a
> Proposal Competition
And ... the issues begin, too. NOT ANY CFJs: I want to see if
we can resolve these with discussion without mucking up the competition.
1. From R2431: "During the Agoran Week following the initiation of a
Proposal Competition"...
Does "the Agoran week following the initiation" mean this
Agreed - It was a foolish mistake on my part. WIll try to get better.
On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 1:35 PM Publius Scribonius Scholasticus <
p.scribonius.scholasti...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> This is not a major issue, but I would appreciate if people could stop
> sending emails to multiple lists.
> -
This is not a major issue, but I would appreciate if people could stop sending
emails to multiple lists.
Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com
> On Jun 5, 2017, at 4:34 PM, Quazie wrote:
>
> I retract "Prime Minister Says What?" From the pool and the competi
I retract "Prime Minister Says What?" From the pool and the competition.
I submit the following replacement proposal for the Proposal Competition
Trivial Proposal "Prime Minister Says What? (v2)" AI = 2, co-author="Typos,
PSS" mess="Typos"
{{{
In rule 2423 replace:
{{{
The holder of the
You have a typo in the replacement because “all Agoran decisions other on
elections” doesn’t make any sense.
Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com
> On Jun 5, 2017, at 4:28 PM, Quazie wrote:
>
> Trivial Proposal "Prime Minister Says What?" AI = 2, co-author=
17 matches
Mail list logo
