On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 3:05 PM, Quazie <quazieno...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 3:03 PM Alex Smith <ais...@alumni.bham.ac.uk> wrote: >> >> Proto: the pender of a proposal and the submitter must be different >> people. When a proposal is pended, the pender gains some fraction of >> the pend fee. (In my experience, preventing people from doing something >> for themselves has been the most reliable way of getting people to do >> it for each other.) >> >> -- >> ais523 > > > Counter proto: Pending is free, but if a proposal passes you get a reward > related to the F/A ratio, if it fails you get fined the A/F ratio. >
Not sure I like this. Proposals sometimes fail due to things that aren't the authors fault. For example, the last version of Assets failed at least partially because of ambiguity in Rule 105. -Aris
