I played agora for the first time as a teenager - learned of nomic in high
school and played for the first time back around 2005 maybe? This was
similar timing to my muffin centric blog nomic win
On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 00:03 Gaelan Steele wrote:
> Wow, I’m surprised. I assumed I was pretty young
Did we break that again? I had fixed that when i was PM.
On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 5:56 PM VJ Rada wrote:
> I forgot to donate the 1 shiny to the community chest. If I can still
> do so, I do so.
>
> On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 10:52 AM, VJ Rada wrote:
> > I submit and pend this with shinies. Curren
you do.
>>>
>>> -o
>>>
>>> > On Sep 22, 2017, at 10:27 PM, Gaelan Steele wrote:
>>> >
>>> > Is this a shiny transfer?
>>> >> On Sep 21, 2017, at 12:32 PM, Quazie wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> Insert 1 Shiny into the recently registered ATM.
>>> >>
>>> >> I give ATM a trust token.
>>>
>>>
>>
>
t; > Outcomes===
> > Registrar: Nichdel (4-2 over PSS)
> > Rulekeepor: Gaelan (unanimous)
> > Surveyor: o (unanimous)
> > Referee: o. (unanimous)
> > Promotor: Aris (unanimous)
> > Tailor: Quazie (with 1 vote cast for a player)
> > Superintendent: Quazie (same as above)
> >
> > Congrats Quazie lmao.
> >
>
>
an office if doing so would make em Overpowered."
> Wouldn't that stop you from gaining both? Or am I missing something?
>
> -Aris
>
> On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 3:34 PM, Quazie wrote:
> > So, i was the speaker at the time of the Prime Minister election, thus my
> >
Darn - I was intrigued to see if R103 beat R2427 and I did indeed have
strength of 1.
On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 3:40 PM Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> Unfortunately, you're just a few hours too late under R2034 I think...
>
> On Wed, 20 Sep 2017, Quazie wrote:
> > So, i was
gt; wrong about that - you can still carry out intents while deregistered.
>
>
> On Wed, 20 Sep 2017, Quazie wrote:
> > 24 hours having passed, QAZ has been revoked. Now that this is done,
> explain what could've been done to stop this?
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 2:18 PM Quazie wrote:
> > I intend to revoke QAZ in 24 hours.
> >
> >
> >
>
So, i was the speaker at the time of the Prime Minister election, thus my
voting power was 1 greater than it should've been, so it was 1, so i think
I didn't lose - in fact Cuddle Beam's vote would've then gone to me, so I
would've won.
it was swamped by the general ambiguity of the
> speaker thing
> and then V.J. Rada was elected, and also I didn't mind you holding both...
>
> On Tue, 19 Sep 2017, Quazie wrote:
> > So - I was overpowered for a small amount of time [Cuz it seems like I'm
> speaker,
&g
So - I was overpowered for a small amount of time [Cuz it seems like I'm
speaker, and I was PM at the same moment via a neat micro-scam that no-one
noticed or cared about, and was also protected by the overpowered rule],
but looking at the rules, they seem broken a bit?
R2472
If a player is
I'm
>> not going to say anything more than that.
>>
>> -Aris
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 3:05 PM, Cuddle Beam
>> wrote:
>> > For the sport of it, would there be a way to prevent this?
>> >
>> > On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 11:18 PM, Quazie wrote:
>> >>
>> >> I intend to revoke QAZ in 24 hours.
>> >
>> >
>>
>
>
If the ruleset self ratified shit would hit the fan. Note: this was
discussed when Gaelan put an Apathy attempt into the SLR a few months ago.
On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 17:57 Cuddle Beam wrote:
> FUCK
> U
> C
> K
>
> On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 2:54 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus <
> p.scribonius.
I vote [Quazie, ais523, Peter Suber, Steve Jobs]
I change my vote to (if valid to do so): [Agora, cats, comex, omd, a Live
Walrus, Quazie, ais523, Peter Suber, Steve Jobs]
On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 5:18 PM Cuddle Beam wrote:
> I dislike having wins being granted by election like this, because
You can't revoke pledges
On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 18:44 Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> I intend to revoke the below pledge with 4 days notice. It was made while
> I was a non-player and CFJs were free for me.
>
> (if I do this, the proposal will now make me party to an agreement without
> consent,
> bu
I would if i'm the speaker
On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 22:14 Aris Merchant <
thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I presume then that you wouldn't object to a "Make G. the Speaker"
> proposal?
>
> -Aris
>
> On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 9:46 PM Quazie
t;
> On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 9:30 PM Quazie wrote:
>
>> You don't need anything but 'g wins the game' for it to work - and the
>> rule itself isn't interesting, so even though I'd vote against it anyways,
>> I'd vote extra against it becaus
You don't need anything but 'g wins the game' for it to work - and the rule
itself isn't interesting, so even though I'd vote against it anyways, I'd
vote extra against it because the rule is totally unnecessary - proposals
can already do whatever they want.
On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 21:21 Aris Me
It is possible for em to do so via prime minister - but I'm uncertain if
this worked as e didn't indicate as such
On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 18:17 Publius Scribonius Scholasticus <
p.scribonius.scholasti...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> How do you card yourself?
>
> Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
>
There exists a possibility that Cuddlebeam didn't win the 2nd time (though
I think he did) and in that case I'm speaker as I would've deputized for PM
and became it, and this failed - just to make matters confusing.
On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 2:58 PM VJ Rada wrote:
> Because we currently have no sp
re genuinely hurtful. If I could, I would point the
> finger at myself for a guaranteed card. I will likely do so next week.
>
> On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 4:35 AM, Quazie wrote:
> > I'm sorry I didn't properly restrict my agency up front. I apologize for
> > expecting my fello
The Karmaster [Or whoever tracks these switches] Should be able to prune
from the top/bottom if: Total karma abs([Positive - Negative]) Exceeds some
threshold - that way you don't need a proposal to fix it later.
On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 12:56 PM Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> Thought about that a bit.
Sorry - Karmastor
On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 12:58 PM Quazie wrote:
> The Karmaster [Or whoever tracks these switches] Should be able to prune
> from the top/bottom if: Total karma abs([Positive - Negative]) Exceeds some
> threshold - that way you don't need a proposal to fix it lat
What if I don't like anyone? Can i Honor myself? Can 2) or 3) be optinal?
On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 12:38 PM Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 13 Sep 2017, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> > - Any player with a karma of -5 or less is a (Japanese term for
> serf?).
>
> Just as an addendum, if 天火狐 or any
Now i'm sad no one made any odd actions on the last leap sexond
On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 17:21 grok (caleb vines)
wrote:
> We could regulate time with ticks or something if we really wanted to
> waste weeks slash months slash years drafting the legislature.
>
> And by we I mean y'all, no way in he
So if I make a private agreement with someone, it's officially unreasonable
to ding them for any failures to fulfill unless we expose the contract
publicly
On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 09:00 Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> Well that's one way to forbid punishing anyone for lies or bad intent, if
> nothing
>
I wouldn't make it a shall, but simply allow for deputisation? I don't want
the Arbitor to get dinged - and this shall adds another burden for an
already heavy office.
On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 08:48 Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
>
> I submit the following Proposal, Arbitor's Union, AI=2:
>
>
2017 at 6:03 AM, Cuddle Beam
>>> wrote:
>>> > > Not particularly motivated rn to object but please let me know why
>>> > > deliberately ratifying false info (with good intent though) is
>>> preferable
>>> > > over proposing to set the gamestate
I have some immediate applications for Official Proposals assuming this
passes.
On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 12:31 PM Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> Oh I forgot the other reason: Official proposals are a good mechanic to
> have for any time an officer needs to fix a bug that benefits everyone.
> So this is
t;>
> >> I agree it feels weird, but at least some of the behavior has already
> >> ratified and things might just confuse the gamestate.
> >>
> >> Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
> >> p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com
> >>
> >>
Tbh I feel weird about it too, and would prefer the fix to come via proposal
On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 22:40 Aris Merchant <
thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I intend, without objection, to ratify the following document:
>
> {{The revision to the secretary's report, available here [1], w
I dislike free parking because it perpetuates the worst monopoly house rule
- fines and fees are supposed to vanish to the bank, not be some magic
money pool that causes a game that should be about auctions and
negotiations into a perpetual slog where nothing interesting happens.
On Thu, Sep 7, 201
If this action ever gets sent to Business, i'll object there, but note: I
object.
On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 3:12 PM Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 7 Sep 2017, V.J Rada wrote:
> > Agora has many offices. But are there enough? Probably not.
>
> I intend to award V.J. Rada a D.N.Phil. with 2 Agoran
pal) to perform an action, that agent CAN perform the
> action
> > if it is POSSIBLE for the principal to do so
> >
> > we don't know if it's possible for Quazie fan and feed you, and I
> > suspect any CFJ asking the question would find IRRELEVANT, so there
>
The only question is, is that one action or two?
On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 10:19 AM Cuddle Beam wrote:
> "Via QAZ I make Quazie fan me with a fancy palm and feed me grapes"
>
> On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 6:46 PM, Quazie wrote:
>
>> I can break a pledge - and I honestly d
17 at 09:43 Gaelan Steele wrote:
> Probably want to ban pledges too.
>
> On Sep 7, 2017, at 8:59 AM, Quazie wrote:
>
> I retract the quoted pledge.
>
>
> I intend with 24 hours notice, to change the agents and powers of the QAZ
> agency to be as follows:
>
> Agent
I hate the economy cap - it doesn't seem fun, and seems to ruin any chance
of a basic income
On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 09:06 Cuddle Beam wrote:
> I agree there. However I feel like Agora is going to be bone dry every
> single time a "get a lot of shinies" scam appears, and a lot of them have
> poppe
I retract the quoted pledge.
I intend with 24 hours notice, to change the agents and powers of the QAZ
agency to be as follows:
Agents: If someone is an agent to another Agency that Quazie is the head
of, then they are an Agent of this Agency as well, except for VJ Rada - e
is a jerk and is not
<
p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I don't believe that it had ever correctly started.
> On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 16:06 Quazie wrote:
>
>> I vote for G in the Herald election if it is still ongoing.
>>
>> I request that the Herald finally tally the results of the V
pathy happened first unless the judgement is *really* weird.
>
> On Mon, 4 Sep 2017, Quazie wrote:
> > Did the apathy happen before or after the 3555 win in question?
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 4, 2017 at 12:42 Kerim Aydin wrote:
> >
> >
> > I judge CFJ 3556 a
08-25 at 04:32 +0200, Cuddle Beam wrote:
> > > > Is the comma important? It's probably important.
> > > >
> > > > So:
> > > >
> > > > Once for each of Quazie's Agencies, I have Quazie appoint me the
> title of
> > > > Sp
wrote:
> Superintendent's Weekly Report
>
> Short List of agencies:
>
> ASC - Head: Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
> BÖÖ - Head: Quazie
> GII - Head: Gaelan
> GOD - Head: Quazie
> MKD - Head: Gaelan
> PRN - Head: Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
> QAZ - H
4 - Prime Minister should have the option to submit one Official Proposal a
month
On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 11:27 AM Quazie wrote:
> 1 - How does Random work here? I'd like an example somewhere in the
> ruleset of what Random means and how to random.
>
> 2 - Why no 2 and just a
1 - How does Random work here? I'd like an example somewhere in the
ruleset of what Random means and how to random.
2 - Why no 2 and just a jump to 3?
3 - I'd love a report that just listed the Fearmonger's attempts at repeal
and re-enactment, at the same monthly cadence - I imagine an OFF post
if I
succeeded.
Also - Cuddlebeam should've gone this route vs using QAZ as it's less
likely that e didn't win (Though I still don't know if e won) - and it
creates well ordered chaos vs batch acting (For each of A do B) which often
fails in Agora.
On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 1
s Scribonius Scholasticus
> p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com
>
>
>
> > On Aug 24, 2017, at 10:28 PM, Cuddle Beam wrote:
> >
> > I have no idea how the method to do that would be because I'm not up to
> date, but, as a shot in the dark:
> >
> > Once, for eac
Also - Anything assigned to me, can be judged by anyone through QAZ - I'm
sorry i have fallen out of activity, i aim to come back soon, but leave QAZ
up for a while
On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 9:07 AM Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, 25 Aug 2017, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> > Which CFJ is actually covering
Nttpf
On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 20:32 Cuddle Beam wrote:
> This has been a problem for me too, the game is very gerontocratic. Not
> rule or rights-wise, but socially, in unwritten things.
>
> I thought that it was only an issue for me because I throttle too hard on
> weird, fringe stuff but it's
No you don't - This is a message to the discussion forum, and thus is just
a statement, not an action.
On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 7:29 AM Kyle Anderson
wrote:
> I vote for myself.
>
>
>
> -K
>
>
>
> *From: *Aris Merchant
> *Sent: *Tuesday, August 22, 2017 11:55 PM
> *To: *agora-busin...@agoranomic
Any player can actually initiate the decisions emself - either to deputize,
or just via the election rules themselves
On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 21:34 V.J Rada wrote:
> ...Use Quazie's agency to initiate the agoran decisions for the
> elections I initiated months ago for Reportor, Herald and Prime
>
I am pro the concept, but questioning the Specifics - I think the super
should be able to unquestionably kill any agency without a valid director -
and then the w/o two objections should only be for invalid agents.
On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 17:05 Publius Scribonius Scholasticus <
p.scribonius.schola
While you're at it - bankruptcy sucks - being unable to work at all with
organizations for long periods of time is a pretty intense punishment.
On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 14:58 Nic Evans wrote:
> If I can, I withdraw the proposal "Less Strict Faking". Thank you and
> sorry to anyone who lost shinie
on wrote:
> > > On Jul 18, 2017, at 5:26 PM, Alex Smith
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, 2017-07-17 at 22:03 -0400, Owen Jacobson wrote:
> > > > On Jul 16, 2017, at 6:58 PM, Quazie
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> >
(which is also
> a pledge):
>
> - I pledge to pay 20 USD (to be transferred by Paypal) for a shiny.
>
> On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 4:03 AM, Owen Jacobson wrote:
>
>> On Jul 16, 2017, at 6:58 PM, Quazie wrote:
>>
>> > I pay nichdel a nickel's worth of shinie
If this CFJ is true then all officers work for a very low rate of ~10 cents
a month - which to me is bonkers.
On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 19:03 Owen Jacobson wrote:
> On Jul 16, 2017, at 6:58 PM, Quazie wrote:
>
> > I pay nichdel a nickel's worth of shinies for taking over as As
You didn't cite which CFJ so I don't know what you actually did in the
quoted message
On Sat, Jul 8, 2017 at 11:34 AM V.J Rada wrote:
> I call for reconsideration (again) and submit the following judgement of
> FALSE
>
> 1. Facts
> Despite (at the time, at least) not being the Surveyor, Cuddleb
On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 9:13 AM grok (caleb vines)
wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 11:12 AM, Quazie wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 09:12 grok (caleb vines)
> wrote:
> >>
> >> back in
> >>
> >>
> >> -grok
> >
>
On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 09:12 grok (caleb vines) wrote:
> back in
>
>
> -grok
>
Welcome back
le he was
> acting as Cuddlebeam. I find that for instances such as this acting as a
> person is equivalent to being that person. Given that no persons other than
> Cuddlebeam were included, I find that no coauthors exist for this proposal.
>
> I find CFJ 3521 FALSE because Quazie did n
On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 12:02 Ørjan Johansen wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Jul 2017, Quazie wrote:
>
> > Ørjan - would you be interested in me making an agency that allows you to
> > point my finger- Your insight is always welcome, and why not allow you to
> > weild a finger.
&g
On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 10:14 Ørjan Johansen wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Jul 2017, CuddleBeam wrote:
>
> > I award myself a White Ribbon (I've been registered for more than 30
> days.
> > I registered on the 30th of May).
>
> The 30 days only apply when giving one to someone else.
>
> The rest of your mess
Nope - fails R2160c - someone holds the office so the lateness must be 14
days or greater, of you needed to state intent
On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 06:07 CuddleBeam wrote:
> I award myself a White Ribbon (I've been registered for more than 30 days.
> I registered on the 30th of May).
>
> I deputize
What if AP was for the pending of proposals you didn't author, and CFJing?
On Sun, Jul 2, 2017 at 13:18 Nicholas Evans wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 2, 2017 at 3:13 PM, Alex Smith
> wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 2017-07-02 at 15:06 -0500, Nicholas Evans wrote:
>> > On Sun, Jul 2, 2017 at 2:52 PM, Alex Smith
>> >
I appreciate the history and acknowledgment that my interpretation wasn't
outlandish - as ADOP I'll get the Agoran Decisions for these going when I
get back from vacation on Tuesday.
Reminder: Elections and the agoran decisions on who to elect are different
concepts, though highly related. As suc
Pender Pend fee
> (sh.)
> ---
> 7865* Aris, o, [1] 3.1 Regulations v4 Aris 6
> 7866* o, Quazie, [2] 1.7 More Betterer Pledges o 6
>
>
> The proposal pool currently contains the following proposals:
>
> IDAuthor(
hat a CFJ
> existed then immediately assigned it.
>
> Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
> p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com
>
>
>
> > On Jun 29, 2017, at 9:13 AM, Quazie wrote:
> >
> > Also: prior rules and game custom allow for linking of CFJs that are
> p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com
>
>
>
> > On Jun 29, 2017, at 9:05 AM, Quazie wrote:
> >
> > 1 - you can't assign pink slips - only the Referee can
> > 2 - I disagree with your conjecture - those CFJ assignments were
> reasonable and made the game f
Welcome back G. Also - check your dates I think you're off by one?
On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 07:11 Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 29 Jun 2017, Alex Smith wrote:
> > The word in question is a real Arabic word, translating to "I invite" /
> > "I call" / "I appeal". If we reverse the order of the le
I don't know, but I just filed two to find out.
On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 4:46 PM Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> How many CFJs is it?
>
> On Wed, 28 Jun 2017, Quazie wrote:
> > A variant on the standard CFJ about if you can CFJ in a particular way.
> >
> > I woul
I just caught the bidirectionality - wow, very clever.
On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 16:43 Quazie wrote:
> A variant on the standard CFJ about if you can CFJ in a particular way.
>
> I would've done the whole thing in Arabic vs any of it in English -
> because in the current form
A variant on the standard CFJ about if you can CFJ in a particular way.
I would've done the whole thing in Arabic vs any of it in English - because
in the current form irrelevant seems reasonable.
On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 16:16 Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
>
> I call for judgement on the following sta
I am happy for this to go away if there's a better shiny economy - I just
feel stifled by the current costs
On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 13:12 CuddleBeam wrote:
> People might just opt to making a proposal per week or try to buy
> Highlights and pretty much never actually pend stuff with shinies ever
I have to write the real version of this but:
Once a week a player may Highlight a proposal in the proposal pool that
they did not directly author. When a player Highlights a proposal, it
becomes pending. When a player highlights a proposal they SHOULD indicate
why they think the proposal Is go
On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 11:40 AM Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wed, 28 Jun 2017, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote:
> > What other things could be re-added?
>
> You could re-add my favorite re-adding mechanism.
>
> IIRC, we used to have an office that was required to, each month, both:
>
> (1
d
> myself
> > a Platinum Ribbon.
> >
> > I now CFJ (again) "Cuddlebeam has earned a Platinum Ribbon", I bar
> nobody.
>
> This is CFJ 3529. I assign it to Quazie.
>
> See also discussion in this thread:
> <http://www.mail-archive.com/agora-discuss
On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 1:15 PM Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 27 Jun 2017, Quazie wrote:
> > I mean, there's no scam here - The parade merely gives future permission
> to add to it -
> > it's a standard convention to not burn down people's scam monument
I mean, there's no scam here - The parade merely gives future permission to
add to it - it's a standard convention to not burn down people's scam
monuments if they aren't disruptive - but the parade notes that you may add
to it and that's legit.
Most welcome isn't defined, and thus disrespecting t
Can anyone get a good translation?
I've got
Because Fukudokko in office is negligent, I will publish the following
article and win the gentleman of Fukuokko.
Bulletin time: Four of Mizukazuki Sakoko
A treasure and the locality of Orchidori company: None
that's all
The sky fox
On Tue, Jun 27,
I would like this CFJ
On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 02:18 CuddleBeam wrote:
> I forgot to clarify a thing, sorry. I retract my lastest CFJ of "Cuddlebeam
> has earned a Platinum Ribbon" (the one posted in that message before this
> one).
>
> Via the Town Fountain Rule ("Any rule may allow special depu
You aren't the ADOP, so you would need instead 4 support, but I'll get to
those elections shortly - don't worry
On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 23:09 V.J Rada wrote:
> Because I am rather bored, I initiate elections for Prime Minister, Herald
> and Report or by announcement.
I am sorry for formating I properly. I'll confronted to the ruleset next
time.
On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 20:41 Gaelan Steele wrote:
>
> > On Jun 26, 2017, at 6:34 PM, Quazie wrote:
> >
> >
> > I resolve the decision(s) to adopt proposal(s) 7864, 7859, 7860,
Gah - i'll republish the single correct body shortly
On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 20:31 Owen Jacobson wrote:
> Is the duplicated report body an error?
>
> -o
>
> On Jun 26, 2017, at 9:05 PM, Quazie wrote:
>
> See https://agoranomic.github.io/ADoP/ for past, cur
On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 11:48 AM Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 26 Jun 2017, CuddleBeam wrote:
> > We could define "privacy" in the tourney's rules.
>
> Yes, I agree, it's simple to add an asterisk to the tourney regulations
> with a statement: "a message is private if and only if ...(whatever)
I don't know if it's overdue just yet, but I am getting to assessing all
possible proposals tomorrow.
On Sat, Jun 24, 2017 at 19:11 Aris Merchant <
thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 24, 2017 at 1:17 PM, omd wrote:
> > Proto: Buy low, sell high (AI=2)
> >
> > Create a Power-
Different name please - will be easy to confuse with trust tokens
On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 08:46 Publius Scribonius Scholasticus <
p.scribonius.scholasti...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> I think this is an interesting idea, but I would love to hear what other’s
> have to say.
>
> Draft regulation:
>
> A
Agreed - I've just been trying to get the dates right in my head, so was
noting it.
On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 23:01 Gaelan Steele wrote:
> Meh. I don’t believe that’s rule-mandated information; don’t think it’s
> worth resubmitting for that.
>
> Gaelan
>
> On Jun 22, 20
On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 22:58 Gaelan Steele wrote:
> THE SHORT LOGICAL RULESET
>
> Most Recent Ruleset Change Recorded:
> Adoption of Proposal 7857, 22 June 2017
Note: it's the 23rd utc
By 2240 the latest clause takes precedence - the switch flips and
defaults. G. Is right I believe
On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 19:44 Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 19 Jun 2017, Josh T wrote:
> > You know what, I can kind of see the argument for imaginary numbers
> > being reasonable.
>
> Do you kn
On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 17:48 CuddleBeam wrote:
> Hr
>
> I pay Agora i (imaginary unit) shinies.
>
Why? There's a CFJ already pending, and a shiny releveling event can fix
agora immediately but just leave you broken. Confused by why you'd attempt
this.
LIES! [you're already here, and registered]
On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 12:09 PM omd wrote:
> I register.
>
et"'s Balance switch to 5.
> >
> >For each of the following players, set eir Balance switch to 50, in
> >the order listed:
> >
> > ais523
> > Aris
> > Murphy
> > Sprocklem
> > 天火狐
>
I was going to point a finger at PSS for not resolving the Victory
Election, but there's not requirement for em to resolve it ever - so
interestingly if the herald doesn't like the outcome of the Victory
Election they can just ignore it.
You do not - there was an objection
On Sat, Jun 17, 2017 at 17:58 Aris Merchant <
thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 12:51 AM Aris Merchant <
> thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 4:16 PM, Alex Smith
>> wrote:
>> > On Mon, 2
1 - this is a non bind pledge as its to discussion.
2 - please never make a non mailing list a public forum - any of these
tools should just produce public fora output if they ever come into
existence
On Sat, Jun 17, 2017 at 11:45 Publius Scribonius Scholasticus <
p.scribonius.scholasti...@googlem
I mostly agree with nichdel, but I do believe we want a rule that says
'Orgs can make switches, and those switches are untracked unless the Org
defines someone within it to track them' which accomplishes the circuit
board need of defining a switch by the rules.
On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 11:40 AM Nic
You need to note that these rule defined switched either are or aren't
tracked, or they will default to the registrar for tracking.
On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 02:39 Publius Scribonius Scholasticus <
p.scribonius.scholasti...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> I like this idea.
>
> Publius Scribonius Sch
You're gonna break that pledge, aren't you?
On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 20:23 Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 15 Jun 2017, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> > Secretary's Weekly Report
>
> I pledge that I SHALL NOT deny any CoE concerning this alleged report.
>
> I note that I do NOT give any willful consent to
On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 10:53 AM Alex Smith
wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-06-15 at 16:00 +0000, Quazie wrote:
> > Wow, that's broken - any public document proporting to be a report
> > self-ratifies?
>
> It's not broken, it's intentional:
>
> a) Public do
Wow, that's broken - any public document proporting to be a report
self-ratifies?
On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 08:28 Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 15 Jun 2017, Quazie wrote:
> > Given there's no way for this report to be published by any one
> > other than the cu
27;s Weekly Report
>
> Date of this report: Thu, 15 Jun 2017
> Date of last report: Sun, 11 Jun 2017
>
>
> Recent events (all times UTC):
>
> - previous report -
> Mon, 15 May 2017 09:27:29 Gaelan paid 1 Shinies (Quazie)
> Mon, 15 May 2017 16:28:54 Agora paid 10 Sh
Nttpf
On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 22:58 Owen Jacobson wrote:
> On Jun 13, 2017, at 4:38 AM, V.J Rada wrote:
>
> I Point the Finger at Cuddlebeam. On 25 May he said "I pledge to not
> submit Judgement on CFJ 3509."
> (
> https://www.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-business/2017-May/03488
1 - 100 of 758 matches
Mail list logo
