Did the apathy happen before or after the 3555 win in question? On Mon, Sep 4, 2017 at 12:42 Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote:
> > > I judge CFJ 3556 as follows: > > INSUFFICIENT. In addition to limited caller's arguments, judging this > correctly required a judgement of CFJ 3555 from Judge grok. > > If grok delivers a judgement of 3555 within the reconsideration window, > I'll file a motion to reconsider this one. > > On Sat, 26 Aug 2017, Alex Smith wrote: > > > On Fri, 2017-08-25 at 03:49 +0100, Alex Smith wrote: > > > On Fri, 2017-08-25 at 04:32 +0200, Cuddle Beam wrote: > > > > Is the comma important? It's probably important. > > > > > > > > So: > > > > > > > > Once for each of Quazie's Agencies, I have Quazie appoint me the > title of > > > > Speaker via that Agency's Powers, as an action on behalf of Quazie. > > > > > > > > Once for each of Quazie's Agencies, I appoint myself Speaker and have > > > > Quazie Support it via that Agency's Powers, as an action on behalf of > > > > Quazie. > > > > > > > > Once for each of Quazie's Agencies, I appoint myself Speaker via that > > > > Agency's Powers on behalf of Quazie. > > > > > > > > Once for each of Quazie's Agencies, I perform an action such which > via use > > > > of that Agency, would grant me the title of Speaker. > > > > > > > > I award myself a Platinum Ribbon. > > > > > > > > I withdraw my latest CFJ of "Cuddlebeam has a Platinum Ribbon." > > > > > > > > I now CFJ: "Cuddlebeam has a Platinum Ribbon". > > > > > > I call for judgement on the statement "Cuddlebeam has a Platinum > > > Ribbon", by spending 1 Action Point. > > > > > > I assign the resulting CFJ the ID number 3556, and assign it to > > > Cuddlebeam. Work your way through your messes yourself! > > > > This CFJ was called legally, but not assigned legally. I thus instead > > assign it to G. (who favoured it). I also suggest that the judgement > > should discuss Cuddlebeam's third attempt to perform these actions, > > even though it occurred after the calling of the CFJ. > > > > > > On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 4:28 AM, Cuddle Beam <cuddleb...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > I have no idea how the method to do that would be because I'm not > up to > > > > > date, but, as a shot in the dark: > > > > > > > > > > Once, for each of Quazie's Agencies, I have Quazie appoint me the > title of > > > > > Speaker via that Agency's Powers, as an action on behalf of Quazie. > > > > > > > > > > Once, for each of Quazie's Agencies, I appoint myself Speaker and > have > > > > > Quazie Support it via that Agency's Powers, as an action on behalf > of > > > > > Quazie. > > > > > > > > > > Once, for each of Quazie's Agencies, I appoint myself Speaker via > that > > > > > Agency's Powers on behalf of Quazie. > > > > > > > > > > Once, for each of Quazie's Agencies, I perform an action such > which via > > > > > use of that Agency, would grant me the title of Speaker. > > > > > > > > > > I award myself a Platinum Ribbon. > > > > > > > > > > I CFJ: Cuddlebeam has a Platinum Ribbon. > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 3:28 AM, V.J Rada <vijar...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > > Assuming either PSSs announcement or my ratification worked, > anyone > > > > > > can use Quazie's agency to appoint themselves speaker. If G's > recent > > > > > > CFJ is correct and my ratification didn't work, Cuddle can still > do > > > > > > so. > > > > > > -- > > > > > > From V.J Rada > > > > -- > > ais523 > > Arbitor > > > > >
